IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v295y2020i1d10.1007_s10479-020-03706-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A finite-horizon Markov decision process model for cancer chemotherapy treatment planning: an application to sequential treatment decision making in clinical trials

Author

Listed:
  • Nazila Bazrafshan

    (Binghamton University, State University of New York)

  • M. M. Lotfi

    (Yazd University)

Abstract

Cancer is one of the major diseases that seriously threaten the human life. Increasing interest in cancer treatment strategies for chemotherapy treatment planning and optimal drug administration has created new applications for mathematical modeling. In this paper, we develop a finite-horizon Markov decision process (MDP) model for cancer chemotherapy treatment planning that could advise selection of the optimal policy for the chemotherapy regimen according to the patient’s condition. The proposed model uses a finite action space of optimal cancer chemotherapy regimens for gastric and gastroesophageal cancers resulted from the proposed optimization model and a finite state space of patients’ toxicity levels. Results show that the proposed approach yields the optimal sequence of gastric and gastroesophageal cancer chemotherapy treatment regimens for a period of chemotherapy treatment which makes possible designing clinical trials for sequential treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • Nazila Bazrafshan & M. M. Lotfi, 2020. "A finite-horizon Markov decision process model for cancer chemotherapy treatment planning: an application to sequential treatment decision making in clinical trials," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 483-502, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:295:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-020-03706-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-020-03706-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-020-03706-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-020-03706-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jagpreet Chhatwal & Oguzhan Alagoz & Elizabeth S. Burnside, 2010. "Optimal Breast Biopsy Decision-Making Based on Mammographic Features and Demographic Factors," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1577-1591, December.
    2. Steven M. Shechter & Matthew D. Bailey & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2008. "The Optimal Time to Initiate HIV Therapy Under Ordered Health States," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 20-33, February.
    3. Burhaneddin Sandıkçı & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Oguzhan Alagoz & Mark S. Roberts, 2008. "Estimating the Patient's Price of Privacy in Liver Transplantation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1393-1410, December.
    4. Sera Kahruman & Elif Ulusal & Sergiy Butenko & Illya Hicks & Kathleen Diehl, 2012. "Scheduling the adjuvant endocrine therapy for early stage breast cancer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 683-705, July.
    5. Alexander Scherrer & Ilka Schwidde & Andreas Dinges & Patrick Rüdiger & Sherko Kümmel & Karl-Heinz Küfer, 2015. "Breast cancer therapy planning – a novel support concept for a sequential decision making problem," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 389-405, September.
    6. Brian T. Denton & Murat Kurt & Nilay D. Shah & Sandra C. Bryant & Steven A. Smith, 2009. "Optimizing the Start Time of Statin Therapy for Patients with Diabetes," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 29(3), pages 351-367, May.
    7. Jinghua Shi & Oguzhan Alagoz & Fatih Erenay & Qiang Su, 2014. "A survey of optimization models on cancer chemotherapy treatment planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 221(1), pages 331-356, October.
    8. Nielsen, Lars Relund & Kristensen, Anders Ringgaard, 2006. "Finding the K best policies in a finite-horizon Markov decision process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 1164-1179, December.
    9. Oguzhan Alagoz & Heather Hsu & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2010. "Markov Decision Processes: A Tool for Sequential Decision Making under Uncertainty," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(4), pages 474-483, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Najmeddine Dhieb & Ismail Abdulrashid & Hakim Ghazzai & Yehia Massoud, 2023. "Optimized drug regimen and chemotherapy scheduling for cancer treatment using swarm intelligence," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 757-770, January.
    2. Amit Yaniv-Rosenfeld & Elizaveta Savchenko & Ariel Rosenfeld & Teddy Lazebnik, 2023. "Scheduling BCG and IL-2 Injections for Bladder Cancer Immunotherapy Treatment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kotas, Jakob & Ghate, Archis, 2018. "Bayesian learning of dose–response parameters from a cohort under response-guided dosing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 328-343.
    2. Oguzhan Alagoz & Jagpreet Chhatwal & Elizabeth S. Burnside, 2013. "Optimal Policies for Reducing Unnecessary Follow-Up Mammography Exams in Breast Cancer Diagnosis," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 200-224, September.
    3. Jonathan E. Helm & Mariel S. Lavieri & Mark P. Van Oyen & Joshua D. Stein & David C. Musch, 2015. "Dynamic Forecasting and Control Algorithms of Glaucoma Progression for Clinician Decision Support," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 979-999, October.
    4. Hossein Kamalzadeh & Vishal Ahuja & Michael Hahsler & Michael E. Bowen, 2021. "An Analytics‐Driven Approach for Optimal Individualized Diabetes Screening," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3161-3191, September.
    5. Anthony Bonifonte & Turgay Ayer & Benjamin Haaland, 2022. "An Analytics Approach to Guide Randomized Controlled Trials in Hypertension Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6634-6647, September.
    6. Eike Nohdurft & Elisa Long & Stefan Spinler, 2017. "Was Angelina Jolie Right? Optimizing Cancer Prevention Strategies Among BRCA Mutation Carriers," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 139-169, September.
    7. Mason, J.E. & Denton, B.T. & Shah, N.D. & Smith, S.A., 2014. "Optimizing the simultaneous management of blood pressure and cholesterol for type 2 diabetes patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 727-738.
    8. Malek Ebadi & Raha Akhavan-Tabatabaei, 2021. "Personalized Cotesting Policies for Cervical Cancer Screening: A POMDP Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Dan Andrei Iancu & Nikolaos Trichakis & Do Young Yoon, 2021. "Monitoring with Limited Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4233-4251, July.
    10. M. Reza Skandari & Steven M. Shechter, 2021. "Patient-Type Bayes-Adaptive Treatment Plans," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 574-598, March.
    11. Mehmet U. S. Ayvaci & Oguzhan Alagoz & Elizabeth S. Burnside, 2012. "The Effect of Budgetary Restrictions on Breast Cancer Diagnostic Decisions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 600-617, October.
    12. Wesley J. Marrero & Mariel S. Lavieri & Jeremy B. Sussman, 2021. "Optimal cholesterol treatment plans and genetic testing strategies for cardiovascular diseases," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-25, March.
    13. Ting-Yu Ho & Shan Liu & Zelda B. Zabinsky, 2019. "A Multi-Fidelity Rollout Algorithm for Dynamic Resource Allocation in Population Disease Management," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 727-755, December.
    14. Mabel C. Chou & Mahmut Parlar & Yun Zhou, 2017. "Optimal Timing to Initiate Medical Treatment for a Disease Evolving as a Semi-Markov Process," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 194-217, October.
    15. Jingyu Zhang & Brian T. Denton & Hari Balasubramanian & Nilay D. Shah & Brant A. Inman, 2012. "Optimization of Prostate Biopsy Referral Decisions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 529-547, October.
    16. Lauren E. Cipriano & Thomas A. Weber, 2018. "Population-level intervention and information collection in dynamic healthcare policy," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 604-631, December.
    17. Najmeddine Dhieb & Ismail Abdulrashid & Hakim Ghazzai & Yehia Massoud, 2023. "Optimized drug regimen and chemotherapy scheduling for cancer treatment using swarm intelligence," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 757-770, January.
    18. Jing Li & Ming Dong & Yijiong Ren & Kaiqi Yin, 2015. "How patient compliance impacts the recommendations for colorectal cancer screening," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 920-937, November.
    19. Elliot Lee & Mariel Lavieri & Michael Volk & Yongcai Xu, 2015. "Applying reinforcement learning techniques to detect hepatocellular carcinoma under limited screening capacity," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 363-375, September.
    20. Wenjuan Fan & Yang Zong & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "Optimal treatment of chronic kidney disease with uncertainty in obtaining a transplantable kidney: an MDP based approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 269-302, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:295:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-020-03706-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.