IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v218y2014i1p51-6910.1007-s10479-012-1060-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging the gap between self schedules and feasible schedules in staff scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Eyjólfur Ásgeirsson

Abstract

Every company that has employees working on irregular schedules must deal with the difficult and time consuming problem of creating feasible schedules for the employees. We introduce an algorithm that takes a partial schedule created by requests from employees and creates feasible schedule where most of the employee’s requests are unchanged, while still making sure that rules and regulations are not violated. The algorithm is based on independent modules, which can be executed in any order, and each module tries to emulate some action taken by a staff manager. Our goal is to create a transparent and fair system that creates feasible schedules of high quality, but also a system where the employees can get an explanation and justification for every change that the algorithm makes to the employee requests. By emulating the actions of staff managers, the algorithm is easily understood by staff managers and, using detailed logs of any action, make any decision easy to explain to the employees. We will present the algorithm and show results from four real world companies and institutions. The results show that a simple module based heuristic can get good results and create fair and feasible schedules that encourage employees to participate in the self-scheduling process. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Eyjólfur Ásgeirsson, 2014. "Bridging the gap between self schedules and feasible schedules in staff scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 218(1), pages 51-69, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:218:y:2014:i:1:p:51-69:10.1007/s10479-012-1060-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-012-1060-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-012-1060-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-012-1060-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A.T. Ernst & H. Jiang & M. Krishnamoorthy & B. Owens & D. Sier, 2004. "An Annotated Bibliography of Personnel Scheduling and Rostering," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 21-144, March.
    2. Jeroen Beliën & Erik Demeulemeester, 2007. "On the trade-off between staff-decomposed and activity-decomposed column generation for a staff scheduling problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 143-166, November.
    3. Dowsland, Kathryn A., 1998. "Nurse scheduling with tabu search and strategic oscillation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 393-407, April.
    4. S M Al-Yakoob & H D Sherali, 2008. "A column generation approach for an employee scheduling problem with multiple shifts and work locations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(1), pages 34-43, January.
    5. Brusco, Michael J. & Jacobs, Larry W., 1995. "Cost analysis of alternative formulations for personnel scheduling in continuously operating organizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 249-261, October.
    6. Bard, Jonathan F. & Purnomo, Hadi W., 2005. "Preference scheduling for nurses using column generation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 510-534, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pieter Smet & Annelies Lejon & Greet Vanden Berghe, 2021. "Demand smoothing in shift design," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 457-484, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eyjólfur Ingi Ásgeirsson & Guðríður Lilla Sigurðardóttir, 2016. "Near-optimal MIP solutions for preference based self-scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 239(1), pages 273-293, April.
    2. Dohn, Anders & Mason, Andrew, 2013. "Branch-and-price for staff rostering: An efficient implementation using generic programming and nested column generation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 157-169.
    3. Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & De Bruecker, Philippe & Demeulemeester, Erik & De Boeck, Liesje, 2013. "Personnel scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 367-385.
    4. Jens Brunner & Günther Edenharter, 2011. "Long term staff scheduling of physicians with different experience levels in hospitals using column generation," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 189-202, June.
    5. Burke, Edmund K. & Curtois, Timothy & Post, Gerhard & Qu, Rong & Veltman, Bart, 2008. "A hybrid heuristic ordering and variable neighbourhood search for the nurse rostering problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 330-341, July.
    6. Maenhout, Broos & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2013. "An integrated nurse staffing and scheduling analysis for longer-term nursing staff allocation problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 485-499.
    7. Lin, Shih-Wei & Ying, Kuo-Ching, 2014. "Minimizing shifts for personnel task scheduling problems: A three-phase algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 323-334.
    8. Vanhoucke, Mario & Maenhout, Broos, 2009. "On the characterization and generation of nurse scheduling problem instances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 457-467, July.
    9. Elina Rönnberg & Torbjörn Larsson, 2010. "Automating the self-scheduling process of nurses in Swedish healthcare: a pilot study," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 35-53, March.
    10. Belií«n, Jeroen & Demeulemeester, Erik, 2008. "A branch-and-price approach for integrating nurse and surgery scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 652-668, September.
    11. Suk Ho Jin & Ho Yeong Yun & Suk Jae Jeong & Kyung Sup Kim, 2017. "Hybrid and Cooperative Strategies Using Harmony Search and Artificial Immune Systems for Solving the Nurse Rostering Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Edmund Burke & Jingpeng Li & Rong Qu, 2012. "A Pareto-based search methodology for multi-objective nurse scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 91-109, July.
    13. Paola Cappanera & Filippo Visintin & Roberta Rossi, 2022. "The emergency department physician rostering problem: obtaining equitable solutions via network optimization," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 916-959, December.
    14. E. Veen & J. L. Hurink & J. M. J. Schutten & S. T. Uijland, 2016. "A flexible iterative improvement heuristic to support creation of feasible shift rosters in self-rostering," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 239(1), pages 189-206, April.
    15. Topaloglu, Seyda, 2009. "A shift scheduling model for employees with different seniority levels and an application in healthcare," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 943-957, November.
    16. Jingpeng Li & Uwe Aickelin & Edmund K. Burke, 2009. "A Component-Based Heuristic Search Method with Evolutionary Eliminations for Hospital Personnel Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 468-479, August.
    17. Mathirajan, M. & Ramanathan, R., 2007. "A (0-1) goal programming model for scheduling the tour of a marketing executive," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 554-566, June.
    18. Burke, Edmund K. & Curtois, Tim, 2014. "New approaches to nurse rostering benchmark instances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 71-81.
    19. Tom Rihm & Philipp Baumann, 2018. "Staff assignment with lexicographically ordered acceptance levels," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 167-189, April.
    20. Hadi W. Purnomo & Jonathan F. Bard, 2007. "Cyclic preference scheduling for nurses using branch and price," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2), pages 200-220, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:218:y:2014:i:1:p:51-69:10.1007/s10479-012-1060-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.