IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/alstar/v106y2022i4d10.1007_s10182-022-00442-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some measures of kurtosis and their inference on large datasets

Author

Listed:
  • Claudio Giovanni Borroni

    (University of Milano-Bicocca)

  • Lucio De Capitani

    (University of Milano-Bicocca)

Abstract

This paper deals with the estimation of kurtosis on large datasets. It aims at overcoming two frequent limitations in applications: first, Pearson's standardized fourth moment is computed as a unique measure of kurtosis; second, the fact that data might be just samples is neglected, so that the opportunity of using suitable inferential tools, like standard errors and confidence intervals, is discarded. In the paper, some recent indexes of kurtosis are reviewed as alternatives to Pearson’s standardized fourth moment. The asymptotic distribution of their natural estimators is derived, and it is used as a tool to evaluate efficiency and to build confidence intervals. A simulation study is also conducted to provide practical indications about the choice of a suitable index. As a conclusion, researchers are warned against the use of classical Pearson’s index when the sample size is too low and/or the distribution is skewed and/or heavy-tailed. Specifically, the occurrence of heavy tails can deprive Pearson’s index of any meaning or produce unreliable confidence intervals. However, such limitations can be overcome by reverting to the reviewed alternative indexes, relying just on low-order moments.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio Giovanni Borroni & Lucio De Capitani, 2022. "Some measures of kurtosis and their inference on large datasets," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(4), pages 573-607, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:alstar:v:106:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10182-022-00442-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10182-022-00442-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10182-022-00442-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10182-022-00442-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jones, M. C. & Rosco, J. F. & Pewsey, Arthur, 2011. "Skewness-Invariant Measures of Kurtosis," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 65(2), pages 89-95.
    2. Wai Leong Ng & Chun Yip Yau, 2018. "Test for the existence of finite moments via bootstrap," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 28-48, January.
    3. Lionel Martellini & Volker Ziemann, 2010. "Improved Estimates of Higher-Order Comoments and Implications for Portfolio Selection," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(4), pages 1467-1502, April.
    4. Charles J. Corrado & Tie Su, 1996. "Skewness And Kurtosis In S&P 500 Index Returns Implied By Option Prices," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 19(2), pages 175-192, June.
    5. M. Angeles Carnero, 2004. "Persistence and Kurtosis in GARCH and Stochastic Volatility Models," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 319-342.
    6. Lucio Capitani & Leo Pasquazzi, 2015. "Inference for performance measures for financial assets," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 73(1), pages 73-98, April.
    7. Anna M. Fiori & Michele Zenga, 2009. "Karl Pearson and the Origin of Kurtosis," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 77(1), pages 40-50, April.
    8. Gastwirth, Joseph L, 1974. "Large Sample Theory of Some Measures of Income Inequality," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 42(1), pages 191-196, January.
    9. David C. Blest, 2003. "A New Measure of Kurtosis Adjusted for Skewness," Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, Australian Statistical Publishing Association Inc., vol. 45(2), pages 175-179, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:osfxxx:tq3an_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Andreas Eberl & Bernhard Klar, 2024. "Centre-free kurtosis orderings for asymmetric distributions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 415-433, February.
    3. Monica Billio & Bertrand Maillet & Loriana Pelizzon, 2022. "A meta-measure of performance related to both investors and investments characteristics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 1405-1447, June.
    4. Perepolkin, Dmytro & Lindsröm, Erik & Sahlin, Ullrika, 2023. "Quantile-parameterized distributions for expert knowledge elicitation," OSF Preprints tq3an, Center for Open Science.
    5. Francq, Christian & Zakoian, Jean-Michel, 2024. "Finite moments testing in a general class of nonlinear time series models," MPRA Paper 121193, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Liu, Wei-han, 2016. "A re-examination of maturity effect of energy futures price from the perspective of stochastic volatility," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 351-362.
    7. Kang, Yan-li & Tian, Jing-Song & Chen, Chen & Zhao, Gui-Yu & Li, Yuan-fu & Wei, Yu, 2021. "Entropy based robust portfolio," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    8. David E. Allen & Michael McAleer & Marcel Scharth, 2009. "Realized Volatility Risk," CARF F-Series CARF-F-197, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo, revised Jan 2010.
    9. Lassance, Nathan & Vrins, Frédéric, 2021. "Portfolio selection with parsimonious higher comoments estimation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    10. Steven L. Heston & Alberto G. Rossi, 2017. "A Spanning Series Approach to Options," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 7(1), pages 2-42.
    11. F. Cavalli & A. Naimzada & N. Pecora & M. Pireddu, 2021. "Market sentiment and heterogeneous agents in an evolutive financial model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1189-1219, September.
    12. Marcelo Cunha Medeiros & Alvaro Veiga, 2004. "Modelling multiple regimes in financial volatility with a flexible coefficient GARCH model," Textos para discussão 486, Department of Economics PUC-Rio (Brazil).
    13. Zhao, Yichuan & Meng, Xueping & Yang, Hanfang, 2015. "Jackknife empirical likelihood inference for the mean absolute deviation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 92-101.
    14. Brito Rui Pedro & Sebastião Helder & Godinho Pedro, 2018. "On the Gains of Using High Frequency Data in Portfolio Selection," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 65(4), pages 365-383, December.
    15. Mills, Jeffrey A & Zandvakili, Sourushe, 1997. "Statistical Inference via Bootstrapping for Measures of Inequality," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(2), pages 133-150, March-Apr.
    16. Arthur Pewsey, 2018. "Parametric bootstrap edf-based goodness-of-fit testing for sinh–arcsinh distributions," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(1), pages 147-172, March.
    17. Teräsvirta, Timo, 2006. "An introduction to univariate GARCH models," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 646, Stockholm School of Economics.
    18. Mihovil Anðelinoviæ & Filip Škunca, 2023. "Optimizing insurers investment portfolios: incorporating alternative investments," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 41(2), pages 361-389.
    19. Wu, Qi & Yan, Xing, 2019. "Capturing deep tail risk via sequential learning of quantile dynamics," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Boudt, Kris & Cornilly, Dries & Verdonck, Tim, 2020. "Nearest comoment estimation with unobserved factors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 381-397.
    21. Ryszard Kokoszczyński & Paweł Sakowski & Robert Ślepaczuk, 2010. "Midquotes or Transactional Data? The Comparison of Black Model on HF Data," Working Papers 2010-15, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:alstar:v:106:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10182-022-00442-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.