IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/agfoec/v12y2024i1d10.1186_s40100-024-00310-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social farming and educational needs: how kindergarten farms could fill a gap

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Paffarini

    (University of Perugia)

  • Biancamaria Torquati

    (University of Perugia)

  • Moira Sannipoli

    (University of Perugia)

  • Alessia Fabbri

    (University of Perugia)

  • Lucio Cecchini

    (University of Perugia)

Abstract

Kindergarten farms are educational initiatives aiming to reinforce or even create relationships between nature and future generations involving them in agricultural settings. They take the form of Outdoor Education (OE), intending to enhance the outdoor environment in its various configurations, from an educational perspective. From the agricultural side, these activities are included in social farming (SF), represents a union between the educative sphere and the agriculture world and offering added farm revenue with a multifunctional view. In Italy, these educational services within the farms (‘Agrinidi’ and ‘Agriasili’) have grown recently, contributing to the educational system where services are marginally available or lacking. This study has focused on the families' needs concerning early childhood services in support of work–life balance; it also investigated their attitudes and interest in OE and in a structured educational service within a farm. To achieve such an aim, a literature study about OE and the educational initiatives within the farm in Italy was carried out. This was followed by an online questionnaire, carried out with 510 resident of a region of Italy (Umbria). The findings indicate high interest in educational services organized in both nature and farms. The statistical and econometric analysis of a subsample of 161 respondents having children under 6 years old has underlined that the attitudes towards OE are affected by specific socio-demographic variables: income and educational levels. In this respect, older participants having a high degree of education and benefiting from a high economic status showed the highest level of preference for OE services. In the conclusions, we underline that developing educational services "Agriasili" and "Agrinidi" can contribute to strengthening the synergy between agriculture and the education sector. They carry out social functions for the creation of collective well-being. They represent a diversification of farm business and a response to citizens' needs for early childhood education in nature; moreover, they push implementation of policies encouraging the birth of these services in rural and peri-urban areas where they are lacking or crowded.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Paffarini & Biancamaria Torquati & Moira Sannipoli & Alessia Fabbri & Lucio Cecchini, 2024. "Social farming and educational needs: how kindergarten farms could fill a gap," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:12:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-024-00310-0
    DOI: 10.1186/s40100-024-00310-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40100-024-00310-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40100-024-00310-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberta Moruzzo & Francesco Di Iacovo & Alessandra Funghi & Paola Scarpellini & Salomon Espinosa Diaz & Francesco Riccioli, 2019. "Social Farming: An Inclusive Environment Conducive to Participant Personal Growth," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Ivana Bassi & Federico Nassivera & Lucia Piani, 2016. "Social farming: a proposal to explore the effects of structural and relational variables on social farm results," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Jeanett Friis Rohde & Sofus Christian Larsen & Mathilde Sederberg & Anne Bahrenscheer & Ann-Kristine Nielsen & Berit Lilienthal Heitmann & Ina Olmer Specht, 2023. "Outdoor Kindergartens: A Structural Way to Improve Early Physical Activity Behaviour?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Angela Genova & Martina Maccaroni & Elena Viganò, 2020. "Social Farming: Heterogeneity in Social and Agricultural Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Marina García-Llorente & Radha Rubio-Olivar & Inés Gutierrez-Briceño, 2018. "Farming for Life Quality and Sustainability: A Literature Review of Green Care Research Trends in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Biancamaria Torquati & Costanza Tancini & Chiara Paffarini & Roberta Illuminati, 2015. "Empirical survey on business models of kindergarten farms," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 3(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Marko Sarstedt & Erik Mooi, 2014. "A Concise Guide to Market Research," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-642-53965-7, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fazari, Erika & Musolino, Dario, 2022. "Social farming in high mountain regions: The case of the Aosta Valley in Italy," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 24(3), December.
    2. Roberta Moruzzo & Giulia Granai & Caterina De Benedictis & Morgana Galardi & Vincenzina Colosimo & Jacopo Sforzi & Francesco Di Iacovo, 2022. "The Development of Sustainable Social Farming in Italy: A Case Studies Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Erika Fazari & Dario Musolino, 2022. "Social farming in high mountain regions: The case of the Aosta Valley in Italy," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 24(3), pages 1-33.
    4. Roberta Moruzzo & Francesco Riccioli & Angela Galasso & Carmelo Troccoli & Salomon Espinosa Diaz & Francesco Di Iacovo, 2020. "Italian Social Farming: the Network of Coldiretti and Campagna Amica," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Annapia Ferrara & Concetta Ferrara & Sabrina Tomasi & Gigliola Paviotti & Giovanna Bertella & Alessio Cavicchi, 2023. "Exploring the Potential of Social Farmers’ Networking as a Leverage for Inclusive Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Hugo Padrón-Ávila & Raúl Hernández-Martín, 2019. "Preventing Overtourism by Identifying the Determinants of Tourists’ Choice of Attractions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Md Maruf Hossan Chowdhury & Mohammad Tarikul Islam & Imran Ali & Mohammed Quaddus, 2024. "The role of social capital, resilience, and network complexity in attaining supply chain sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2621-2639, March.
    8. Meldrick Arjay A. Magsino & Reynold S. Beredo & Arex A. Anza, 2014. "The Motivational Effects of LPU Awards of Excellence: Basis for Improvement," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(12), pages 371-397, December.
    9. Barıs Aksu & Gulsen Akman, 2024. "How Eco-innovation Determinants and Eco-innovation Strategy Influences Sustainability Performance of SMEs? Mediating Role of Eco-innovation Strategy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9368-9392, June.
    10. Federico Fraboni & Gabriele Prati & Giulia Casu & Marco De Angelis & Luca Pietrantoni, 2022. "A cluster analysis of cyclists in Europe: common patterns, behaviours, and attitudes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 591-620, April.
    11. Marc Dressler & Ivan Paunovic, 2021. "Not All Wine Businesses Are the Same: Examining the Impact of Winery Business Model Extensions on the Size of Its Core Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    12. Joanna Wiśniewska-Paluszak & Grzegorz Paluszak, 2021. "The Urban and Peri-Urban Farms (UPFs) Relational Model: The Case of Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Laura-Gabriela CONSTANTIN, 2014. "Catastrophe Bonds. From Structure to Strategy – A Cluster Analysis at European Level," Economia. Seria Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(2), pages 304-317, December.
    14. Caterina Contini & Giuseppe Marotta & Biancamaria Torquati, 2020. "Multi-actor approaches to implement cooperative strategies and value chains based on sustainability," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-4, December.
    15. Schlägel, Christopher & Sarstedt, Marko, 2016. "Assessing the measurement invariance of the four-dimensional cultural intelligence scale across countries: A composite model approach," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 633-649.
    16. Tae Kyung Yoon & SoEun Ahn, 2020. "Clustering Koreans’ Environmental Awareness and Attitudes into Seven Groups: Environmentalists, Dissatisfieds, Inactivators, Bystanders, Honeybees, Optimists, and Moderates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Cheng, John W. & Mitomo, Hitoshi, 2016. "Effects of ICT and media information on collective resilience after disasters – from a virtual crowd to a psychological crowd – Part 1 - ICT and media information and collective resilience in an emerg," 27th European Regional ITS Conference, Cambridge (UK) 2016 148663, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    18. Brand, Christian & Schwanen, Tim & Anable, Jillian, 2020. "‘Online Omnivores’ or ‘Willing but struggling’? Identifying online grocery shopping behavior segments using attitude theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    19. Ali, Fazilatulaili & Dissanayake, Dilum & Bell, Margaret & Farrow, Malcolm, 2018. "Investigating car users' attitudes to climate change using multiple correspondence analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 237-247.
    20. Yelena Popova & Sergejs Popovs, 2022. "Impact of Smart Economy on Smart Areas and Mediation Effect of National Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:12:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-024-00310-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.