IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sos/sosjrn/200311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Success Factors which Affecting Participatory Budgeting: A Case Study on New YorkAbstract: After over 2 decades of military dictatorship Brazil became a democracy in 1988. The Participatory Budget was formally introduced in Porto Alegre under the leadership of the Workers’ Party in coalition with pro-democracy social movements. Interest in participatory budgeting is continuing to grow. Participatory Budgeting has now been instituted in over 1500 cities worldwide. In this study it has been aimed to introduce the basic criteria of participatory budgeting and to examine the factors affecting success in participatory budgeting. The sample of New York City, which is highly compatible with the factors we are dealing with, is analysed and the participatory budgeting process and its results are analysed

Author

Listed:
  • İsmail GÜNEŞ

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • İsmail GÜNEŞ, 2020. "Success Factors which Affecting Participatory Budgeting: A Case Study on New YorkAbstract: After over 2 decades of military dictatorship Brazil became a democracy in 1988. The Participatory Budget was," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 28(45).
    • Handle: RePEc:sos:sosjrn:200311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/1037200
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. BOAVENTURA de SOUSA SANTOS, 1998. "Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy," Politics & Society, , vol. 26(4), pages 461-510, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saguin, Kidjie, 2018. "Why the poor do not benefit from community-driven development: Lessons from participatory budgeting," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 220-232.
    2. ,, 2014. "A ranking method based on handicaps," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 9(3), September.
    3. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    4. Mark Skidmore & Hideki Toya, 2013. "Natural Disaster Impacts and Fiscal Decentralization," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 89(1), pages 101-117.
    5. Arze del Granado, F. Javier & Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge & McNab, Robert M., 2012. "Decentralized Governance and Preferences for Public Goods," MPRA Paper 42459, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Pranab Bardhan, 2002. "Decentralization of Governance and Development," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 185-205, Fall.
    7. Malleson, Tom, 2014. "After Occupy: Economic Democracy for the 21st Century," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199330102.
    8. Patricia Perkins, 2007. "Feminist Ecological Economics and Sustainability," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 227-244, December.
    9. Santosh Mehrotra, 2006. "Governance and basic social services: ensuring accountability in service delivery through deep democratic decentralization," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(2), pages 263-283.
    10. Spada,Paolo & Mellon,Jonathan & Peixoto,Tiago Carneiro & Sjoberg,Fredrik Matias, 2015. "Effects of the internet on participation : study of a public policy referendum in Brazil," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7204, The World Bank.
    11. A H J (Bert) Helmsing, 2002. "Decentralisation, Enablement, and Local Governance in Low-Income Countries," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 20(3), pages 317-340, June.
    12. Miloš Milosavljević & Željko Spasenić & Jovan Krivokapić, 2023. "Bibliometric Review of Participatory Budgeting: Current Status and Future Research Agenda," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Roman V. Efremov & Alexander V. Lotov, 2014. "Multi-criteria Remote Asynchronous Group Decision Screening: An Experimental Study," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 31-48, January.
    14. Sheely, Ryan, 2015. "Mobilization, Participatory Planning Institutions, and Elite Capture: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 251-266.
    15. Schaeffer, Michael & Yilmaz, Serdar, 2008. "Strengthening local government budgeting and accountability," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4767, The World Bank.
    16. Jaramillo, Miguel & Wright, Glenn Daniel, 2015. "Participatory Democracy and Effective Policy: Is There a Link? Evidence from Rural Peru," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 280-292.
    17. Sergio Montero & Gianpaolo Baiocchi, 2022. "A posteriori comparisons, repeated instances and urban policy mobilities: What ‘best practices’ leave behind," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(8), pages 1536-1555, June.
    18. Khalid Hasan Al Jasimee & Francisco Javier Blanco-Encomienda, 2023. "A SEM-NCA approach towards the impact of participative budgeting on budgetary slack and managerial performance: The mediating role of leadership style and leader-member exchange," Papers 2310.09993, arXiv.org.
    19. J Rios & D Rios Insua, 2008. "A framework for participatory budget elaboration support," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(2), pages 203-212, February.
    20. Antonio Postigo, 2011. "Accounting for Outcomes in Participatory Urban Governance through State–Civil-society Synergies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1945-1967, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sos:sosjrn:200311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aysen Sivrikaya (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sosyoekonomijournal.org/home.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.