Factor Specialization in U.S. and U.K. Trade: Simple Departures from the Factor-content Theory
In this paper we perform a theoretical and data analysis aimed at linking two strands of literature based on the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek (HOV) theorem. First, we calculate factor-intensity rankings for U.S. and U.K. global trade, using several natural resources, types of capital, and detailed labor occupations as factors. Taking the HOV theorem as a valid framework for analysis, we compute and compare statistically the factor-content rankings that emerge, relating these rankings to issues of comparative advantage. We go on to investigate whether there is greater specialization across broad factor categories or within factor categories, which has implications for the depiction of trade determinants. Second, we undertake an econometric comparison of the underlying input-output tables in the two economies to investigate the empirical basis for a fundamental HOV assumption. The fact that the U.S. and the U.K. have significant amounts of comparable data on industrial occupational employment allows for econometric specifications of a fairly general nature. We develop a series of estimable equations that allow for neutral productivity differences and measurement error. We use this approach to test HOV against more general alternatives. The results reject HOV in favor of a model with factor-augmenting industry-neutral parameters with measurement biases. On the consumption side it appears that the notion of identical, homothetic preferences is fairly consistent with the data, though available GNP figures misstate the apparent ratio of national expenditure shares.
Volume (Year): 131 (1995)
Issue (Month): III (September)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: c/o SNB/BNS, Börsenstrasse 15, PO Box 2800, CH-8022 Zürich|
Phone: +41 (0)44 631 32 34
Fax: +41 (0)44 631 39 01
Web page: http://www.sjes.ch
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Keith Maskus & Catherine Sveikauskas & Allan Webster, 1994. "The composition of the human capital stock and its relation to international trade: Evidence from the US and Britain," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 130(1), pages 50-76, March.
- Richard Brecher & Eshan Choudhri, 1992.
"Some Empirical Support for the Heckscher-Ohlin Model of Production,"
Carleton Economic Papers
92-08, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
- Richard A. Brecher & Ehsan U. Choudhri, 1993. "Some Empirical Support for the Heckscher-Ohlin Model of Production," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 272-85, May.
- Trefler, Daniel, 1995. "The Case of the Missing Trade and Other Mysteries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(5), pages 1029-46, December.
- Sveikauskas, Leo A, 1983. "Science and Technology in United States Foreign Trade," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 93(371), pages 542-54, September.
- Robert W. Staiger & Alan V. Deardorff & Robert M. Stern, 1987. "An Evaluation of Factor Endowments and Protection as Determinants of Japanese and American Foreign Trade," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 20(3), pages 449-63, August.
- Helpman, Elhanan, 1984. "The Factor Content of Foreign Trade," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 94(373), pages 84-94, March.
- Brecher, Richard A. & Choudhri, Ehsan U., 1982. "The factor content of international trade without factor-price equalization," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3-4), pages 277-283, May.
- Maskus, Keith E., 1985. "A test of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek theorem: The Leontief commonplace," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3-4), pages 201-212, November.
- Trefler, Daniel, 1993. "International Factor Price Differences: Leontief Was Right!," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 101(6), pages 961-87, December.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ses:arsjes:1995-iii-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Steiner)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.