IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/mngsci/y2019i1p47-67.html

Оценка условий для развития перспективных энергетических технологий в субъектах Российской Федерации // Assessing Conditions for the Development of Advanced Energy Technologies on the Regional Level in Russian Federation

Author

Listed:
  • I. Volkova O.

    (National Research University “Higher School of Economics”)

  • Y. Burda D.

    (National Research University “Higher School of Economics”)

  • E. Gavrikova V.

    (National Research University “Higher School of Economics”)

  • A. Konev V.

    (Federal state budgetary organization “Russian Energy Agency” of Minenergo of Russia)

  • И. Волкова О.

    (Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»)

  • Е. Бурда Д.

    (Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»)

  • Е. Гаврикова В.

    (Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»)

  • А. Конев В.

    (Российское энергетического агентство Минэнерго России)

Abstract

Development of the Russian energy sector seems to be rather promising (considering the speed and nature of the emergence of new technologies, such as digital power equipment, prognostic instruments, real-time payment techniques, etc.), however, there is no clear understanding of the potential demand level regarding specific technologies. Frequently companies abandon research and development projects due to the uncertainty and risk of losing investments because of the absence of end-users. At the same time foreign suppliers of innovative solutions (including those for the energy sector) gain market power. Simultaneously, emerges the problem of strengthening competitiveness of the Russian Federation regional economies in the view of tightening competition from foreign suppliers of innovative solutions including solutions for the energy sector. Перспективы развития энергетического сектора в Российской Федерации, с одной стороны, являются довольно масштабными — учитывая скорость и характер распространения инновационных технологий в данной сфере (цифровое силовое оборудование, инструменты прогнозирования, технологии осуществления взаиморасчетов в режиме реального времени), а с другой — существует проблема, связанная со слабым пониманием перспективного объема спроса на различные технологии. Зачастую многие компании отказываются от проектов и НИОКР исключительно в силу того, что опасаются риска невозврата осуществленных инвестиций, обусловленного отсутствием потребителей результатов конкретного проекта. Одновременно активизируется проблема повышения конкурентоспособности экономики регионов Российской Федерации в условиях ужесточения конкуренции со стороны зарубежных поставщиков различных инновационных решений — в том числе в области энергетики.

Suggested Citation

  • I. Volkova O. & Y. Burda D. & E. Gavrikova V. & A. Konev V. & И. Волкова О. & Е. Бурда Д. & Е. Гаврикова В. & А. Конев В., 2019. "Оценка условий для развития перспективных энергетических технологий в субъектах Российской Федерации // Assessing Conditions for the Development of Advanced Energy Technologies on the Regional Level in Russian Federation," Управленческие науки // Management Science, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 9(1), pages 47-67.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2019:i:1:p:47-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/195/184.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Александров Владимир Николаевич, 2013. "Программы Инновационного Развития Госкомпаний Электроэнергетической Отрасли: Инициация, Формирование, Реализация," Higher School of Economics Economic Journal Экономический журнал Высшей школы экономики, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 17(2), pages 301-322.
    2. Ronde, Patrick & Hussler, Caroline, 2005. "Innovation in regions: What does really matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1150-1172, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nishimura, Junichi & Okamuro, Hiroyuki, 2011. "Subsidy and networking: The effects of direct and indirect support programs of the cluster policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 714-727, June.
    2. Muhammad Nouman & Mohammad Sohail Yunis & Muhammad Atiq & Owais Mufti & Abdul Qadus, 2022. "‘The Forgotten Sector’: An Integrative Framework for Future Research on Low- and Medium-Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Miroslav Šipikal & Milan Buček, 2018. "The Role of FDI in Regional Innovation and Its Influence on the Emergence of Knowledge Spillover Effects," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Jan Stejskal & Petr Hajek & Oto Hudec (ed.), Knowledge Spillovers in Regional Innovation Systems, pages 195-218, Springer.
    4. Hussler, Caroline & Ronde, Patrick, 2007. "The impact of cognitive communities on the diffusion of academic knowledge: Evidence from the networks of inventors of a French university," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 288-302, March.
    5. Hiroyuki Okamuro & Junichi Nishimura, 2013. "Impact of university intellectual property policy on the performance of university-industry research collaboration," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 273-301, June.
    6. Martínez-Román, Juan A. & Gamero, Javier & Delgado-González, María de Loreto & Tamayo, Juan A., 2019. "Innovativeness and internationalization in SMEs: An empirical analysis in European countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. Tavassoli, Sam & Karlsson, Charlie, 2021. "The role of location on complexity of firms’ innovation outcome," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    8. Annamaria Fiore & Maria Jennifer Grisorio & Francesco Prota, 2009. "Do we really need regional innovation agencies? Some insights from the experience of an Italian region," SERIES 0025, Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza - Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro", revised Nov 2009.
    9. Paul Robson & Helen Haugh & Bernard Obeng, 2009. "Entrepreneurship and innovation in Ghana: enterprising Africa," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 331-350, March.
    10. Lutz Bellmann & Katalin Evers & Reinhard Hujer, 2018. "Regional and firm-specific effects on innovations using multi-level methods," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(2), pages 319-349, September.
    11. Fritsch, Michael & Slavtchev, Viktor, 2006. "Measuring the efficiency of regional innovation systems: an empirical assessment," Freiberg Working Papers 2006/08, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    12. Giovanni Abramo & Francesca Apponi & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, 2024. "The moderating role of the territorial research infrastructure on the geographic proximity effect in research collaborations: a regional-based view," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(6), pages 3149-3168, June.
    13. Barra, Cristian & Zotti, Roberto, 2015. "Regional innovation system (in)efficiency and its determinants: an empirical evidence from Italian regions," MPRA Paper 67067, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Paulo Jorge Reis Mourão & Irina Alina Popescu, 2025. "Regional analysis of business agglomeration patterns in knowledge-intensive service sectors in Romania," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 74(1), pages 1-36, March.
    15. Jan Stejskal & Petr Hajek & Oto Hudec (ed.), 2018. "Knowledge Spillovers in Regional Innovation Systems," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-319-67029-4.
    16. Gilbert, Brett Anitra, 2012. "Creative destruction: Identifying its geographic origins," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 734-742.
    17. Olof Ejermo & Urban Gråsjö, 2014. "Accessibility to R&D: a re-examination of the consequences for invention and innovation," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Börje Johansson & Kiyoshi Kobayashi & Roger R. Stough (ed.), Knowledge, Innovation and Space, chapter 3, pages 51-79, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. J Knoben & AT Arikan & F van Oort & O Raspe, 2016. "Agglomeration and firm performance: One firm’s medicine is another firm’s poison," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(1), pages 132-153, January.
    19. Okada, Aya & Siddharthan, N.S., 2007. "Industrial Clusters in India: Evidence from Automobile Clusters in Chennai and the National Capital Region," IDE Discussion Papers 103, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    20. Edquist, Charles & Zabala, Jon Mikel, 2009. "Outputs of innovation systems: a European perspective," Papers in Innovation Studies 2009/14, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2019:i:1:p:47-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://managementscience.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.