IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/mngsci/y2018i1p100-109.html

Лидерство-служение как фактор социального предпринимательства // Servant Leadership as a Factor of Social Entrepreneurship

Author

Listed:
  • O. Vikhanskiy S.

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Economics)

  • A. Mirakyan G.

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Economics)

  • О. Виханский С.

    (МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова)

  • А. Миракян Г.

    (МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова)

Abstract

Subject. The article focuses on two perspective directions of research in theoretical managerial thought. One of the directions is social entrepreneurship that exists in the field of entrepreneurship. The other one is servant leadership that describes an emerging concept in the field of leadership.Purpose. The purpose of the study is to formulate the tasks developing the management theory that is based on the symbiotic relationship between social entrepreneurship and servant leadership.Methodology. The scholars introduce new methodological approach to research and contribute to the conceptual development of management. The authors analyze and consolidate the interconnection and interpenetration of social entrepreneurship and servant leadership.Results. The article provides an overview of the main essence of social entrepreneurship and its general features. They distinguish social entrepreneurship from “traditional” one as well as from other cognate activities like “social activism”. Moreover, the work considers external and internal antecedents influencing the social entrepreneurship development. The following part of the article is devoted to the development of a new avenue in the leadership area. The authors describe fundamental changes in the management paradigm, in particular transformations in the leadership views. The article also addresses the major specifics of the servant leadership ideology and indicates the significance of servant leaders. Finally, the authors focus on the role of servant leadership in social entrepreneurship. They highlight the basic attributes that show the similar value orientations both for servant leader and social entrepreneur.Conclusions. In conclusion, the attempt to find interrelationships of certain directions from the classic management theory would be one of the contemporary trends in management theory development. Предмет. Данная статья посвящена исследованию двух динамично развивающихся направлений управленческой теоретической мысли, одно из которых находится в области предпринимательства, а другое — в области лидерства. К данным направлениям относятся социальное предпринимательство и лидерство как служение.Цель. Целью статьи является постановка задач развития теории управления на основе симбиоза социального предпринимательства и лидерства как служения.Методология. Данная работа вносит концептуальный вклад в развитие менеджмента, открывая новое направление для проведения исследований. В статье проводятся анализ и синтез взаимовлияния и взаимопроникновения социального предпринимательства и лидерства-служения.Результаты. В работе раскрываются основная сущность и общие особенности социального предпринимательства, отличающие его от «традиционного» предпринимательства и близких форм социальной активности. Кроме этого, рассматриваются внешние и внутренние предпосылки, оказывающие влияние на развитие социального предпринимательства. В части статьи, посвященной развитию нового направления в области лидерства, авторы описывают кардинальные изменения парадигмы управления, а также трансформацию взглядов на лидерство. Далее приводятся ключевые особенности идеологии лидерства как служения, и обозначается значимость лидеров данного типа для современной управленческой среды. В одном из заключительных разделов статьи раскрывается роль лидерства-служения в социальном предпринимательстве. Авторы выделяют основополагающие атрибуты, описывающие особую ценностную ориентацию личности, характерную как для лидера-служителя, так и для социального предпринимателя.Выводы. Делается вывод о том, что современным трендом развития управленческой теории станет попытка поиска взаимосвязей отдельных направлений, на которые распалась классическая теория менеджмента.

Suggested Citation

  • O. Vikhanskiy S. & A. Mirakyan G. & О. Виханский С. & А. Миракян Г., 2018. "Лидерство-служение как фактор социального предпринимательства // Servant Leadership as a Factor of Social Entrepreneurship," Управленческие науки // Management Science, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 8(1), pages 100-109.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2018:i:1:p:100-109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/142/147.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Filipe Santos, 2012. "A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 335-351, December.
    2. James Austin & Howard Stevenson & Jane Wei–Skillern, 2006. "Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(1), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reeti Kulshrestha & Arunaditya Sahay & Subhanjan Sengupta, 2022. "Constituents and Drivers of Mission Engagement for Social Enterprise Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(1), pages 90-120, March.
    2. Barbara Bradač Hojnik & Katja Crnogaj, 2020. "Social Impact, Innovations, and Market Activity of Social Enterprises: Comparison of European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel, 2015. "The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1082, September.
    4. Bhattarai, Charan Raj & Kwong, Caleb C.Y. & Tasavori, Misagh, 2019. "Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 47-60.
    5. Adélie Ranville, 2019. "Redefining value(s) to understand social enterprises’ business models," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-04961353, HAL.
    6. Sophie Bacq & Kimberly A. Eddleston, 2018. "A Resource-Based View of Social Entrepreneurship: How Stewardship Culture Benefits Scale of Social Impact," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 589-611, October.
    7. Busch, Christian & Barkema, Harry, 2022. "Align or perish: Social enterprise network orchestration in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2).
    8. Singaram, Raja & Radu-Lefebvre, Miruna & Gartner, William B., 2023. "Gordian knot uncut: Understanding the problem of founder exit in social ventures," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    9. Adélie Ranville, 2019. "Redefining value(s) to understand social enterprises’ business models," Post-Print hal-04961353, HAL.
    10. Alessandra De Chiara, 2025. "What is a circular entrepreneur? Understanding entrepreneurs’ experiences in order to support the circular economy," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-35, December.
    11. Pradeep Kumar Hota, 2023. "Tracing the Intellectual Evolution of Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Advances, Current Trends, and Future Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 637-659, January.
    12. Tykkyläinen, Saila & Ritala, Paavo, 2021. "Business model innovation in social enterprises: An activity system perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 684-697.
    13. Marcelo F. Cruz Jara & Jelena Spanjol, 2025. "Understanding Multiple Perspectives on Social Value in Business: An Integrative Review and Typology," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(2), pages 407-435, May.
    14. Dries, Elisa & De Beule, Filip & Bruneel, Johan, 2026. "A hybrid approach to internationalization: An exploratory study of social enterprises," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 61(2).
    15. Adélie Ranville & Marcos Barros, 2022. "Towards Normative Theories of Social Entrepreneurship. A Review of the Top Publications of the Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 407-438, October.
    16. Katrin M Smolka & Thijs H J Geradts & Peter W van der Zwan & Andreas Rauch, 2023. "Why bother teaching entrepreneurship? A field quasi-experiment on the behavioral outcomes of compulsory entrepreneurship education," Post-Print hal-04701309, HAL.
    17. Xiaoti Hu & Susan Marlow & Angelika Zimmermann & Lee Martin & Regina Frank, 2020. "Understanding Opportunities in Social Entrepreneurship: A Critical Realist Abstraction," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(5), pages 1032-1056, September.
    18. Lortie, Jason & Cox, Kevin C. & Roundy, Philip T., 2022. "Social impact models, legitimacy perceptions, and consumer responses to social ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 312-321.
    19. Geradts, Thijs H.J. & Alt, Elisa, 2022. "Social entrepreneurial action in established organizations: Developing the concept of social intrapreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 197-206.
    20. Sahasranamam, Sreevas & Nandakumar, M.K., 2020. "Individual capital and social entrepreneurship: Role of formal institutions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 104-117.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2018:i:1:p:100-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://managementscience.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.