IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/econom/y2017i2p134-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНЫЙ ПОДХОД К ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКЕ НАЛОГОВОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ ГОСУДАРСТВА // Institutional Approach to the Government Fiscal Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Tsepilova S.

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Е. Цепилова С.

    (РАНХиГС при Президенте РФ)

  • В. Горобинская И.

    (ООО «Аудиторская фирма «Аудит-Инфо»)

Abstract

The subject of the study is an institutional approach that russian specialists in tax and taxation started to apply quite recently to research in tax relations. The purpose of the work is to characterize the government fiscal policy within an institutional approach. The methodology of the study is based on the refinement of the conceptual and categorical apparatus (the article analyzes the concepts “institution”, “tax institution”, “fiscal policy”). The authors examine the classification of approaches and various interpretations of the fiscal policy concept with the aim to suggest their own assessment of the stages in development of russian fiscal policy over the period 1990 to 2016 with the use of the modern institutional terms, notably the terms «inclusive» and «extractive». The research results may be applied when developing the state fiscal policy. It is concluded that for the period 1990-2016 the russian tax policy went through the following stages: from being initially predominantly extractive to inclusive-oriented (through gradually expansion of inclusive characteristics) and back to extractive because of prevailing extractive features. To avoid an economic collapse, it is necessary to transform the extractive nature of the government fiscal policy into an inclusive one. Предмет исследования - институциональный подход в исследованиях налоговых отношений, который стал применяться отечественными налоговедами относительно недавно. Цель работы - характеристика налоговой политики государства с позиций институционального подхода. Методология проведения исследования базируется на уточнении понятийно-категориального аппарата (в статье осуществлен анализ понятий «институт», «налоговый институт», «налоговая политика»), приведена классификация подходов и различных трактовок налоговой политики государства, что позволило далее, через использование современных терминов институциональной школы - «инклюзивный» и «экстрактивный» - дать авторскую характеристику этапов развития налоговой политики россии в 1990-2016 гг. Применение результатов исследования возможно при разработке государственной налоговой политики. Сделан вывод о том, что за период 1990-2016 гг. Налоговая политика в россии прошла следующие этапы - от исходного преобладания экстрактивного характера через расширение инклюзивной направленности преимущественно в инклюзивную направленность и опять вернулась к развертыванию экстрактивной направленности. Чтобы избежать экономической катастрофы, необходима трансформация экстрактивного характера налоговой политики государства в инклюзивный.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Tsepilova S. & Е. Цепилова С. & В. Горобинская И., 2017. "ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНЫЙ ПОДХОД К ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКЕ НАЛОГОВОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ ГОСУДАРСТВА // Institutional Approach to the Government Fiscal Policy," Экономика. Налоги. Право // Economics, taxes & law, ФГОБУ "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 10(2), pages 134-141.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:econom:y:2017:i:2:p:134-141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economy.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/286/269.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petersen, Thomas & Manstetten, Reiner, 2009. "Beständigkeit im Raum des Sozialen: Der Begriff der Institution bei Arnold Gehlen," UFZ Discussion Papers 6/2009, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    2. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2003. "The Mystery of the Routine. The Darwinian Destiny of An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 54(2), pages 355-384.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beckert, Jens & Ebbinghaus, Bernhard & Hassel, Anke & Manow, Philip (ed.), 2006. "Transformationen des Kapitalismus: Festschrift für Wolfgang Streeck zum sechzigsten Geburtstag," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 57, number 57.
    2. Geoffrey Hodgson & Thorbjørn Knudsen, 2006. "The nature and units of social selection," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 477-489, December.
    3. Erik Lundmark & Alf Westelius, 2014. "Entrepreneurship as Elixir and Mutagen," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(3), pages 575-600, May.
    4. Valentine P. Vishnevsky & Aleksandr V. Gurnak, 2015. "Taxation, evolutionary economics and tax populations," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 1(1), pages 113-132.
    5. Stańczyk-Hugiet Ewa, 2014. "Routines in the process of organizational evolution," Management, Sciendo, vol. 18(2), pages 73-87, December.
    6. Christian Cordes, 2014. "There are several ways to incorporate evolutionary concepts into economic thinking," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2014-02, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    7. Markus C. Becker & Nathalie Lazaric & Richard R. Nelson & Sidney G. Winter, 2005. "Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 14(5), pages 775-791, October.
    8. Khan, Haider, 2008. "Causal Depth contra Humean Empiricism: Aspects of a Scientific Realist Approach to Explanation," MPRA Paper 8297, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    9. Robert Charles Sheldon & Eric Michael Laviolette & Fabien Geuser, 2020. "Explaining the process and effects of new routine introduction with a notion of micro-level entrepreneurship," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 609-642, July.
    10. Khan, Haider, 2008. "Causal Depth: Aspects of a Scientific Realist Approach to Causal Explanation contra Humean Empiricism," MPRA Paper 8293, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    11. Burr, Wolfgang & Frohwein, Torsten, 2012. "Regelbrüche in Organisationen," Research Papers on Innovation, Services and Technology 1/2012, University of Stuttgart, Institute of Business Administration, Department I - Institute of Research & Development and Innovation Management.
    12. Agnès Festré & Nathalie Lazaric, 2007. "Routines and leadership in Schumpeter and von Mises' analysis of economic change," Post-Print halshs-00271338, HAL.
    13. Christian Cordes, 2006. "Darwinism in economics: from analogy to continuity," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 529-541, December.
    14. Rouslan Koumakhov & Adel Daoud, 2017. "Routine and reflexivity: Simonian cognitivism vs practice approach," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 26(4), pages 727-743.
    15. Laurent Antonczak & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2022. "Creativity on the Move: Nexus of Technology, Slack and Social Complexities," Post-Print hal-03631857, HAL.
    16. Martijn van der Steen, 2011. "The emergence and change of management accounting routines," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(4), pages 502-547, May.
    17. Ron A. Boschma & Jesse W.J. Weltevreden, 2005. "B2c e-commerce adoption in inner cities: An evolutionary perspective," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 0503, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Feb 2005.
    18. G. Buenstorf, 2005. "How Useful Is Universal Darwinism as a Framework to Study Competition and Industrial Evolution?," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2005-02, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    19. Dehua Gao & Flaminio Squazzoni & Xiuquan Deng, 2018. "The Intertwining Impact of Intraorganizational and Routine Networks on Routine Replication Dynamics: An Agent-Based Model," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-23, November.
    20. Lukas Radwan & Sebastian Kinder, 2013. "Practising the Diffusion of Organizational Routines," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(10), pages 2442-2458, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:econom:y:2017:i:2:p:134-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://economy.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.