IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v59y2022i9p1889-1908.html

Urban scaling in rapidly urbanising China

Author

Listed:
  • Weiqian Lei

    (Wuhan University, China)

  • Limin Jiao

    (Wuhan University, China)

  • Gang Xu

    (Wuhan University, China)

  • Zhengzi Zhou

    (University College London, UK)

Abstract

Understanding the scaling characteristics in China is critical for perceiving the development process of rapidly urbanising countries. This paper conducts a comprehensive scaling analysis with quantitative assessment of a large number of diverse urban indicators of 275 Chinese cities. Our findings confirm that urban scaling laws can also be applied to rapidly urbanising China but demonstrate some unique features echoing its distinct urbanisation. Chinese urban population agglomeration results in more effective economic production but the economies of scale for infrastructure are less obvious. Some urban indicators associated with infrastructure and living facilities surprisingly scale super-linearly with urban population size, contrary to expected sublinear scaling behaviours. In developing countries, different-sized cities have diverse agglomeration, industrial and resource allocation advantages, which can be reflected by scaling exponents. We characterise these unique features in detail, exploring the spatial disparities and temporal evolution of scaling exponents ( β ). Strong regional variations and differences are particularly pronounced in Northeast China and the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration. Scaling exponent variations over time reflect the temporal evolution of the urban system and measure the coordination and balance of urbanisation. Economic output was most efficient in 2009 and β of GDP was slightly greater than 1.15 in recent years. Urban land expansion has been accelerating since 2000 with β remaining around 0.85–0.90. The study of urban scaling in China is enlightening in elaborating the uniqueness and coordination of urban development in rapidly urbanising countries and provides support in formulating differentiated urban planning for different-sized cities to promote coordinated development.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiqian Lei & Limin Jiao & Gang Xu & Zhengzi Zhou, 2022. "Urban scaling in rapidly urbanising China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(9), pages 1889-1908, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:9:p:1889-1908
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980211017817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980211017817
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980211017817?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rudolf Cesaretti & José Lobo & Luís M A Bettencourt & Scott G Ortman & Michael E Smith, 2016. "Population-Area Relationship for Medieval European Cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Fulong Wu, 2020. "Adding new narratives to the urban imagination: An introduction to ‘New directions of urban studies in China’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 459-472, February.
    3. Anthony F J van Raan & Gerwin van der Meulen & Willem Goedhart, 2016. "Urban Scaling of Cities in the Netherlands," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Michail Fragkias & José Lobo & Deborah Strumsky & Karen C Seto, 2013. "Does Size Matter? Scaling of CO 2 Emissions and U.S. Urban Areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-8, June.
    5. Joao Meirelles & Camilo Rodrigues Neto & Fernando Fagundes Ferreira & Fabiano Lemes Ribeiro & Claudia Rebeca Binder, 2018. "Evolution of urban scaling: Evidence from Brazil," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Gudipudi, Ramana & Rybski, Diego & Lüdeke, Matthias K.B. & Zhou, Bin & Liu, Zhu & Kropp, Jürgen P., 2019. "The efficient, the intensive, and the productive: Insights from urban Kaya scaling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 155-162.
    7. Anthony Gar-On Yeh & Zifeng Chen, 2020. "From cities to super mega city regions in China in a new wave of urbanisation and economic transition: Issues and challenges," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 636-654, February.
    8. Xu, Gang & Zhou, Zhengzi & Jiao, Limin & Zhao, Rui, 2020. "Compact Urban Form and Expansion Pattern Slow Down the Decline in Urban Densities: A Global Perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. Jerry Zhirong Zhao & Shengnan Lou & Camila Fonseca & Richard Feiock & Ruowen Shen, 2021. "Explaining transit expenses in US urbanised areas: Urban scale, spatial form and fiscal capacity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(2), pages 280-296, February.
    10. Robert Hannay & Martin Wachs, 2007. "Factors influencing support for local transportation sales tax measures," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 17-35, January.
    11. Emanuele Strano & Vishal Sood, 2016. "Rich and Poor Cities in Europe. An Urban Scaling Approach to Mapping the European Economic Transition," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-8, August.
    12. repec:fth:stanho:e-95-4 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. José Lobo & Luís M A Bettencourt & Deborah Strumsky & Geoffrey B West, 2013. "Urban Scaling and the Production Function for Cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-10, March.
    14. Arbesman, Samuel & Christakis, Nicholas A., 2011. "Scaling of prosocial behavior in cities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(11), pages 2155-2159.
    15. Glaeser, Edward L. & Scheinkman, JoseA. & Shleifer, Andrei, 1995. "Economic growth in a cross-section of cities," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 117-143, August.
    16. Luiz G A Alves & Renio S Mendes & Ervin K Lenzi & Haroldo V Ribeiro, 2015. "Scale-Adjusted Metrics for Predicting the Evolution of Urban Indicators and Quantifying the Performance of Cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    17. repec:plo:pone00:0087902 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Luís M A Bettencourt & José Lobo & Deborah Strumsky & Geoffrey B West, 2010. "Urban Scaling and Its Deviations: Revealing the Structure of Wealth, Innovation and Crime across Cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-9, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Shihan & Ai, Shangle, 2025. "Digital finance and urban ecological resilience," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    2. Luca S. D’Acci, 2026. "The allometry of housing prices in urban scaling laws and an equalised dwellers’ utility across settlement sizes," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 53(3), pages 626-646, March.
    3. Linzhuo Li & Nannan Zhao, 2023. "Understanding urban concentration of complex manufacturing activities in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amit Patel, 2023. "How applicable are scaling laws in predicting slum populations in urban systems? Evidence from India," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(2), pages 541-555, February.
    2. Anthony FJ van Raan, 2024. "Simulating urban scaling with a term linkages network of a university," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(9), pages 2092-2107, November.
    3. Fabiano L Ribeiro & Joao Meirelles & Vinicius M Netto & Camilo Rodrigues Neto & Andrea Baronchelli, 2020. "On the relation between transversal and longitudinal scaling in cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Joao Meirelles & Fabiano L. Ribeiro & Gabriel Cury & Claudia R. Binder & Vinicius M. Netto, 2021. "More from Less? Environmental Rebound Effects of City Size," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Lei, Weiqian & Jiao, Limin & Xu, Gang, 2022. "Understanding the urban scaling of urban land with an internal structure view to characterize China’s urbanization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. Xu, Gang & Xu, Zhibang & Gu, Yanyan & Lei, Weiqian & Pan, Yupiao & Liu, Jie & Jiao, Limin, 2020. "Scaling laws in intra-urban systems and over time at the district level in Shanghai, China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    7. Qingsong He & Lingping Huang & Jing Li, 2022. "Rediscovering the Scaling Law of Urban Land from a Multi-Scale Perspective—A Case Study of Wuhan," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Jose Lobo & Luis MA Bettencourt & Michael E Smith & Scott Ortman, 2020. "Settlement scaling theory: Bridging the study of ancient and contemporary urban systems," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(4), pages 731-747, March.
    9. António Curado & Bruno Damásio & Sara Encarnação & Cristian Candia & Flávio L Pinheiro, 2021. "Scaling behavior of public procurement activity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Li, Zekun & Chen, Zhenhua, 2023. "Predicting the future development scale of high-speed rail through the urban scaling law," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Joao Meirelles & Camilo Rodrigues Neto & Fernando Fagundes Ferreira & Fabiano Lemes Ribeiro & Claudia Rebeca Binder, 2018. "Evolution of urban scaling: Evidence from Brazil," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Tasnuva Mahjabin & Susana Garcia & Caitlin Grady & Alfonso Mejia, 2018. "Large cities get more for less: Water footprint efficiency across the US," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Hu, Zhibin & Wu, Guangdong & Han, Yilong & Niu, Yanliang, 2023. "Unraveling the dynamic changes of high-speed rail network with urban development: Evidence from China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    14. Sutton, Jack & Shahtahmassebi, Golnaz & Hanley, Quentin S. & Ribeiro, Haroldo V., 2024. "A heteroscedastic Bayesian generalized logistic regression model with application to scaling problems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    15. Andres Gomez-Lievano & Oscar Patterson-Lomba, 2018. "Estimating the drivers of urban economic complexity and their connection to economic performance," Papers 1812.02842, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    16. Michail Fragkias & José Lobo & Deborah Strumsky & Karen C Seto, 2013. "Does Size Matter? Scaling of CO 2 Emissions and U.S. Urban Areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-8, June.
    17. Chenchen Shi & Naliang Guo & Xiaoping Zhu & Feng Wu, 2022. "Assessing Urban Resilience from the Perspective of Scaling Law: Evidence from Chinese Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
    18. Michail Fragkias & José Lobo & Karen C Seto, 2017. "A comparison of nighttime lights data for urban energy research: Insights from scaling analysis in the US system of cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(6), pages 1077-1096, November.
    19. Deborah Strumsky & Jose Lobo & Charlotta Mellander, 2021. "As different as night and day: Scaling analysis of Swedish urban areas and regional labor markets," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(2), pages 231-247, February.
    20. Yusra Ghafoor & Yi-Shin Chen & Kuan-Ta Chen, 2019. "Social Interaction Scaling for Contact Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:9:p:1889-1908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.