IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v45y2008i12p2521-2540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Third-wave Gentrification in New Zealand: The Case of Auckland

Author

Listed:
  • Laurence Murphy

    (Department of Property, Faculty of Business and Economics, the University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand, l.murphy@auckland.ac.nz.)

Abstract

New Zealand's engagement with neo-liberalism since the mid 1980s has resulted in a profound transformation of its economy and society. As part of this process, new urban governance structures aligned with more entrepreneurial state activities have helped to fashion a dramatic revalorisation of inner-city areas. Under supportive planning conditions, considerable inflows of real estate capital have produced a set of spatially distinct and socially polarised residential outcomes. This paper reviews the nature of urban change in New Zealand under neo-liberalism and, in particular, examines the character of waterfront development in Auckland. It is argued that the creation of Viaduct Harbour represents third-wave, new-build gentrification. The `celebration' of this form of waterfront development holds significant implications for the future evolution of gentrification in New Zealand.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurence Murphy, 2008. "Third-wave Gentrification in New Zealand: The Case of Auckland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2521-2540, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:45:y:2008:i:12:p:2521-2540
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098008097106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098008097106
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098008097106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Davidson & Loretta Lees, 2005. "New-Build ‘Gentrification’ and London's Riverside Renaissance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(7), pages 1165-1190, July.
    2. Chris Hamnett & Drew Whitelegg, 2007. "Loft Conversion and Gentrification in London: From Industrial to Postindustrial Land Use," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(1), pages 106-124, January.
    3. Alan Latham, 2003. "Urbanity, Lifestyle and Making Sense of the New Urban Cultural Economy: Notes from Auckland, New Zealand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(9), pages 1699-1724, August.
    4. Jason Hackworth & Neil Smith, 2001. "The changing state of gentrification," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 92(4), pages 464-477, November.
    5. Laurence Murphy, 2003. "Reasserting the ‘social’ in social rented housing: politics, housing policy and housing reforms in New Zealand," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 90-101, March.
    6. Laurence Murphy, 2000. "A profitable housing policy? The privatization of the New Zealand Government's residential mortgage portfolio," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 395-399.
    7. B. J. Gleeson & K. J. Grundy, 1997. "New Zealand's Planning Revolution Five Years On: A Preliminary Assessment," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 293-314.
    8. Jennifer Dixon & Neil Ericksen & Janet Crawford & Philip Berke, 1997. "Planning under a Co-operative Mandate: New Plans for New Zealand," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 603-614.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renee Gordon & Francis L. Collins & Robin Kearns, 2017. "‘It is the People that Have Made Glen Innes’: State-led Gentrification and the Reconfiguration of Urban Life in Auckland," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 767-785, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Davidson, 2008. "Spoiled Mixture: Where Does State-led `Positive' Gentrification End?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2385-2405, November.
    2. Dan Immergluck, 2009. "Large Redevelopment Initiatives, Housing Values and Gentrification: The Case of the Atlanta Beltline," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(8), pages 1723-1745, July.
    3. Rosemary D.F. Bromley & Peter K. Mackie, 2009. "Displacement and the New Spaces for Informal Trade in the Latin American City Centre," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(7), pages 1485-1506, June.
    4. Tom Slater, 2008. "‘A Literal Necessity to be Re‐Placed’: A Rejoinder to the Gentrification Debate," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 212-223, March.
    5. David J Madden, 2018. "Pushed off the map: Toponymy and the politics of place in New York City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(8), pages 1599-1614, June.
    6. Ingmar Pastak & Anneli KÄHRIK, 2021. "SYMBOLIC DISPLACEMENT REVISITED: Place‐making Narratives in Gentrifying Neighbourhoods of Tallinn," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 814-834, September.
    7. Francis Leo Collins & Wardlow Friesen, 2011. "Making the Most of Diversity? The Intercultural City Project and a Rescaled Version of Diversity in Auckland, New Zealand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(14), pages 3067-3085, November.
    8. Hyun Bang Shin & Loretta Lees & Ernesto López-Morales, 2016. "Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 455-470, February.
    9. Tim Butler, 2007. "Re‐urbanizing London Docklands: Gentrification, Suburbanization or New Urbanism?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 759-781, December.
    10. Nagao, Kenkichi & Edgington, David W., 2023. "Local industrial displacement, zoning conflicts and monozukuri planning in Higashi Osaka, Japan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Robert R. Hewitt, 2014. "Globalization and Landscape Architecture," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440135, February.
    12. Tarin Cheer & Robin Kearns & Laurence Murphy, 2002. "Housing Policy, Poverty, and Culture: ‘Discounting’ Decisions among Pacific Peoples in Auckland, New Zealand," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 20(4), pages 497-516, August.
    13. Benjamin F Teresa, 2016. "Managing fictitious capital: The legal geography of investment and political struggle in rental housing in New York City," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(3), pages 465-484, March.
    14. Nathan, Max, 2022. "Does light touch cluster policy work? Evaluating the tech city programme," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    15. Ingmar Pastak & Eneli Kindsiko & Tiit Tammaru & Reinout Kleinhans & Maarten Van Ham, 2019. "Commercial Gentrification in Post‐Industrial Neighbourhoods: A Dynamic View From an Entrepreneur’s Perspective," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 110(5), pages 588-604, December.
    16. Suzanne Vallance, 2014. "Living on the Edge: Lessons from the Peri-urban Village," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 1954-1969, November.
    17. Loretta Lees, 2003. "Super-gentrification: The Case of Brooklyn Heights, New York City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2487-2509, November.
    18. Andrew Harris, 2008. "From London to Mumbai and Back Again: Gentrification and Public Policy in Comparative Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2407-2428, November.
    19. Lin Jiang & Yani Lai & Ke Chen & Xiao Tang, 2022. "What Drives Urban Village Redevelopment in China? A Survey of Literature Based on Web of Science Core Collection Database," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    20. Lynda Cheshire & Robin Fitzgerald & Yan Liu, 2019. "Neighbourhood change and neighbour complaints: How gentrification and densification influence the prevalence of problems between neighbours," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(6), pages 1093-1112, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:45:y:2008:i:12:p:2521-2540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.