Author
Listed:
- João Gama Marques
- Daniela Chesi
- Raquel Oliveira Coelho
- Inês Castanheira Costa
- Celso Santos Antão
- Carlos Alberto Pedro
- Paulo Silva Santos
- José Xavier Diogo
Abstract
Background: In Europe, psychiatric disorders seem to affect up to 50% of the homeless. In Portugal there were, at a certain time, circa 3,396 homeless people, half living in the capital city, Lisboa. Aims: The Homeless Outreach Psychiatric Engagement for Lisboa (HOPE 4 Lisboa) was created, in January 1st 2022, as a collaboration including staff from the local state asylum, medical school and town hall in Lisboa, Portugal, in order to provide better treatment for the super difficult cases of psychiatric patients living homeless in Lisboa. Method: During 2022, the HOPE 4 team made night rounds, every 15 days on Tuesday’s night (20:30 to 23:30) trying to reach, at least, one dozen of homeless psychiatric patients, previously identified. Results: The HOPE 4 Lisboa interviewed 101 patients (53.4%) out of the 189 programed visits. From this group, 72 (72%) had already a previous psychiatric diagnosis. From those 101 patients, reports for 47 (47%) were sent for an eventual compulsory psychiatric assessment. From those 47 only 21 patients (21%) were admitted in the psychiatry ward. Finally we discuss the most super difficult patient we found, as a small case report: a John Doe living in complete Diogenes syndrome. Conclusions: there are still a few psychiatrists interested in treating homeless people completely or partially out of the classic mental health care systems. Some claim to be doing interstitial psychiatry, others street psychiatry, but we could also call it marontology.
Suggested Citation
João Gama Marques & Daniela Chesi & Raquel Oliveira Coelho & Inês Castanheira Costa & Celso Santos Antão & Carlos Alberto Pedro & Paulo Silva Santos & José Xavier Diogo, 2024.
"Homeless Outreach Psychiatric Engagement for Lisboa (HOPE 4 Lisboa): One year of marontology, and one John Doe living with Diogenes syndrome,"
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(1), pages 227-230, February.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:1:p:227-230
DOI: 10.1177/00207640231179322
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:70:y:2024:i:1:p:227-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.