IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v50y2019i2p180-201.html

The Game Between Game Theory and Gaming Simulations: Design Choices

Author

Listed:
  • Bill Roungas
  • Femke Bekius
  • Sebastiaan Meijer

Abstract

Background. The abstraction of complex systems, which is required by default when modelling gaming simulations, is a convoluted and time-consuming process. For gaming simulations to be efficient and effective, the problem of the real system they imitate needs to be narrowed down and simplified as much as possible. Additionally, even after abstraction of the real system, multiple design decisions need to be made and these may differ depending on the gaming simulation. Aim. This article proposes a framework for formalizing, and consequently standardizing, expediting and simplifying, the modelling of gaming simulations. Method. The proposed framework applies game concepts pertaining to game theory in the abstraction of the real system and the game design decisions . Results. Application of the framework in three case studies reveals several advantages of incorporating game theory into game design, such as formally defining the game design elements and identifying the worst-case scenarios in the real-systems , to name but two. Conclusions. Given the framework’s advantages in general, and the game design recommendations it offers in particular, it is safe to conclude that, for the cases presented in this article, the framework make positive contributions towards the development of gaming simulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Bill Roungas & Femke Bekius & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2019. "The Game Between Game Theory and Gaming Simulations: Design Choices," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 50(2), pages 180-201, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:50:y:2019:i:2:p:180-201
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878119827625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878119827625
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878119827625?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott Moss, 2001. "Game Theory: Limitations and an Alternative," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 4(2), pages 1-2.
    2. Thomas H. Apperley, 2006. "Genre and game studies: Toward a critical approach to video game genres," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 37(1), pages 6-23, March.
    3. Bekius, Femke & Meijer, Sebastiaan & de Bruijn, Hans, 2018. "Collaboration patterns in the Dutch railway sector: Using game concepts to compare different outcomes in a unique development case," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 360-368.
    4. Martin J. Osborne & Ariel Rubinstein, 1994. "A Course in Game Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262650401, December.
    5. Bolton, Gary E., 2002. "Game theory's role in role-playing," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 353-358.
    6. John D. Sterman, 1989. "Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 321-339, March.
    7. Geert R. Teisman & Erik-Hans Klijn, 2008. "Complexity Theory and Public Management," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 287-297, May.
    8. Olivier Barreteau & Christophe Le Page & Pascal Perez, 2007. "Contribution of simulation and gaming to natural resource management issues: An introduction," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(2), pages 185-194, June.
    9. Olivier Barreteau & C. Le Page & Pascal Perez, 2007. "Contribution of simulation and gaming to natural resource management issues: An introduction," Post-Print hal-00453891, HAL.
    10. Hendrik Vollmer, 2013. "What kind of game is everyday interaction?," Rationality and Society, , vol. 25(3), pages 370-404, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Datu Buyung Agusdinata & Heide Lukosch & Muhammad Hanif & David Watkins, 2023. "A Playful Approach to Household Sustainability: Results From a Pilot Study on Resource Consumption," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 54(1), pages 104-130, February.
    2. J. Tuomas Harviainen, 2019. "Editorial to the April Issue," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 50(2), pages 99-101, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Datu Buyung Agusdinata & Heide Lukosch & Muhammad Hanif & David Watkins, 2023. "A Playful Approach to Household Sustainability: Results From a Pilot Study on Resource Consumption," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 54(1), pages 104-130, February.
    2. Federico Barnabè, 2015. "Managerial Myopia in Mismanaging Renewable Resources," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(6), pages 763-791, December.
    3. Thomas J. Fennewald & Brent Kievit-Kylar, 2013. "Integrating Climate Change Mechanics Into a Common Pool Resource Game," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(2-3), pages 427-451, April.
    4. Sondoss ElSawah & Alan McLucas & Jason Mazanov, 2015. "Communicating About Water Issues in Australia," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(6), pages 713-741, December.
    5. Diana Reckien & Klaus Eisenack, 2013. "Climate Change Gaming on Board and Screen," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(2-3), pages 253-271, April.
    6. Mathieu Dionnet & Marcel Kuper & Ali Hammani & Patrice Garin, 2008. "Combining role-playing games and policy simulation exercises: An experience with Moroccan smallholder farmers," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 39(4), pages 498-514, December.
    7. Christophe Le Page & Anne Dray & Pascal Perez & Claude Garcia, 2016. "Exploring How Knowledge and Communication Influence Natural Resources Management With ReHab," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 47(2), pages 257-284, April.
    8. Patrick d’Aquino & Alassane Bah, 2013. "Land Policies for Climate Change Adaptation in West Africa," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 44(2-3), pages 391-408, April.
    9. Femke Bekius & Sebastiaan Meijer & Hugo Thomassen, 2022. "A Real Case Application of Game Theoretical Concepts in a Complex Decision-Making Process: Case Study ERTMS," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 153-185, February.
    10. Sy, Charlle, 2017. "A policy development model for reducing bullwhips in hybrid production-distribution systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 67-79.
    11. Pastore, Erica & Alfieri, Arianna & Zotteri, Giulio, 2019. "An empirical investigation on the antecedents of the bullwhip effect: Evidence from the spare parts industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 121-133.
    12. Szabó, György & Borsos, István & Szombati, Edit, 2019. "Games, graphs and Kirchhoff laws," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 416-423.
    13. Berry, D. & Naim, M. M., 1996. "Quantifying the relative improvements of redesign strategies in a P.C. supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 181-196, December.
    14. Towill, Denis R. & Zhou, Li & Disney, Stephen M., 2007. "Reducing the bullwhip effect: Looking through the appropriate lens," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 444-453, July.
    15. Shi, Yi & Deng, Yawen & Wang, Guoan & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    16. Marc Le Menestrel, 2003. "A one-shot Prisoners’ Dilemma with procedural utility," Economics Working Papers 819, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    17. Cheng‐Kuang Wu & Yi‐Ming Chen & Dachrahn Wu & Ching‐Lin Chi, 2020. "A Game Theory Approach for Assessment of Risk and Deployment of Police Patrols in Response to Criminal Activity in San Francisco," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(3), pages 534-549, March.
    18. Moreno, William Fernando, 2025. "Modeling Knowledge and Decision-Making with the Conditional Reasoning Framework," OSF Preprints zwpnv_v9, Center for Open Science.
    19. Nasimeh Heydaribeni & Achilleas Anastasopoulos, 2019. "Linear Equilibria for Dynamic LQG Games with Asymmetric Information and Dependent Types," Papers 1909.04834, arXiv.org.
    20. Müller, Christoph, 2020. "Robust implementation in weakly perfect Bayesian strategies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:50:y:2019:i:2:p:180-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.