IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v7y2017i3p2158244017723689.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television: Increases in the Use of Swear Words in American Books, 1950-2008

Author

Listed:
  • Jean M. Twenge
  • Hannah VanLandingham
  • W. Keith Campbell

Abstract

Evidence is accumulating that American culture has become more individualistic since the 1950s. In the present research, we focused on one plausible manifestation of individualism, the use of swear words in cultural products. We examined trends in the use of the seven words identified by George Carlin in 1972 as the “seven words you can never say on television†in the Google Books corpus of American English books from 1950 to 2008. We find a steady linear increase in the use of swear words, with books published in 2005-2008 twenty-eight times more likely to include swear words than books published in the early 1950s. Increases for individual swear words ranged from 4 to 678 times ( d s = 6.58-45.42). These results suggest that American culture has become increasingly accepting of the expression of taboo words, consistent with higher cultural individualism.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean M. Twenge & Hannah VanLandingham & W. Keith Campbell, 2017. "The Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television: Increases in the Use of Swear Words in American Books, 1950-2008," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:7:y:2017:i:3:p:2158244017723689
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244017723689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244017723689
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244017723689?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H Andrew Schwartz & Johannes C Eichstaedt & Margaret L Kern & Lukasz Dziurzynski & Stephanie M Ramones & Megha Agrawal & Achal Shah & Michal Kosinski & David Stillwell & Martin E P Seligman & Lyle H U, 2013. "Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Longxing Li & Chu-Ren Huang & Vincent Xian Wang, 2020. "Lexical Competition and Change: A Corpus-Assisted Investigation of Gambling and Gaming in the Past Centuries," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gallus, Jana & Bhatia, Sudeep, 2020. "Gender, power and emotions in the collaborative production of knowledge: A large-scale analysis of Wikipedia editor conversations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 115-130.
    2. Liang Xu & Min Xu & Zehua Jiang & Xin Wen & Yishan Liu & Zaoyi Sun & Hongting Li & Xiuying Qian, 2023. "How have music emotions been described in Google books? Historical trends and corpus differences," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Karol Król & Dariusz Zdonek, 2021. "Most Often Motivated by Social Media: The Who, the What, and the How Much—Experience from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Vivek Kulkarni & Margaret L Kern & David Stillwell & Michal Kosinski & Sandra Matz & Lyle Ungar & Steven Skiena & H Andrew Schwartz, 2018. "Latent human traits in the language of social media: An open-vocabulary approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Jong Hwan Suh, 2022. "Machine-Learning-Based Gender Distribution Prediction from Anonymous News Comments: The Case of Korean News Portal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Karel Hrazdil & Jiri Novak & Rafael Rogo & Christine Wiedman & Ray Zhang, 2020. "Measuring executive personality using machine‐learning algorithms: A new approach and audit fee‐based validation tests," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3-4), pages 519-544, March.
    7. Luo, Shuli & He, Sylvia Y., 2021. "Understanding gender difference in perceptions toward transit services across space and time: A social media mining approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 63-73.
    8. Gow, Ian D. & Kaplan, Steven N. & Larcker, David F. & Zakolyukina, Anastasia A., 2016. "CEO Personality and Firm Policies," Research Papers 3444, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    9. Mikkel Wallentin, 2018. "Sex differences in post-stroke aphasia rates are caused by age. A meta-analysis and database query," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Hannes Rosenbusch & Maya Aghaei & Anthony M. Evans & Marcel Zeelenberg, 2021. "Psychological trait inferences from women’s clothing: human and machine prediction," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 479-501, November.
    11. Eszter Hargittai, 2015. "Is Bigger Always Better? Potential Biases of Big Data Derived from Social Network Sites," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 659(1), pages 63-76, May.
    12. Rachel Winter & Anna Lavis, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Young People’s Mental Health in the UK: Key Insights from Social Media Using Online Ethnography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Daniel Preoţiuc-Pietro & Svitlana Volkova & Vasileios Lampos & Yoram Bachrach & Nikolaos Aletras, 2015. "Studying User Income through Language, Behaviour and Affect in Social Media," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Jungmin Kim & Juyong Park & Wonjae Lee, 2018. "Why do people move? Enhancing human mobility prediction using local functions based on public records and SNS data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-29, February.
    15. Lushi Chen & Tao Gong & Michal Kosinski & David Stillwell & Robert L Davidson, 2017. "Building a profile of subjective well-being for social media users," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, November.
    16. Chunhua Ju & Qiuyang Gu & Yi Fang & Fuguang Bao, 2020. "Research on User Influence Model Integrating Personality Traits under Strong Connection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Salvatore Giorgi & David B. Yaden & Johannes C. Eichstaedt & Robert D. Ashford & Anneke E.K. Buffone & H. Andrew Schwartz & Lyle H. Ungar & Brenda Curtis, 2020. "Cultural Differences in Tweeting about Drinking Across the US," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Bianca E. Lopez & Nicholas R. Magliocca & Andrew T. Crooks, 2019. "Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media Data for Socio-Environmental Systems Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Jacob Levy Abitbol & Eric Fleury & Márton Karsai, 2019. "Optimal Proxy Selection for Socioeconomic Status Inference on Twitter," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, May.
    20. Karel Hrazdil & Fereshteh Mahmoudian & Jamal A. Nazari, 2021. "Executive personality and sustainability: Do extraverted chief executive officers improve corporate social responsibility?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1564-1578, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:7:y:2017:i:3:p:2158244017723689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.