IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v4y2014i3p2158244014552425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contextual Positioning

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Ralph
  • Melanie Birks
  • Ysanne Chapman

Abstract

The use of documents as a source of extant data is relatively common in grounded theory (GT) research. While GT promotes the dictum “all is data,†finding consistent commentary on how to use documents as data is difficult, especially among seminal works. The need to be aware of the context of extant data is a vital step prior to commencing analysis, especially in view of the lack of physical interaction between the researcher and that data. Contextual positioning is proposed as a tool that can be used to prepare extant data for analysis. Contextual positioning enhances the interactivity of the data collection process and positions the researcher before the document in a more reflexive manner. A model of contextual positioning is presented in this article to assist researchers in positioning extant data (such as documents) more reflexively. A concrete example of the use of this method is outlined to promote understanding of the value of this process.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Ralph & Melanie Birks & Ysanne Chapman, 2014. "Contextual Positioning," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(3), pages 21582440145, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:2158244014552425
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244014552425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244014552425
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244014552425?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen Irvine & Michael Gaffikin, 2006. "Getting in, getting on and getting out: reflections on a qualitative research project," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(1), pages 115-145, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mia Kaspersen & Thomas Riise Johansen, 2016. "Changing Social and Environmental Reporting Systems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 731-749, June.
    2. Gregory Ludwig & Jon Pemberton, 2011. "A managerial perspective of dynamic capabilities in emerging markets: The case of the Russian steel industry," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 16(3), pages 215-236.
    3. Ghio, Alessandro & Verona, Roberto, 2022. "Unfolding institutional plurality in hybrid organizations through practices: The case of a cooperative bank," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(4).
    4. Christou, Prokopis & Saveriades, Alexis, 2009. "The use of Ethnography to explore Tourist Satisfaction Antecedents," MPRA Paper 25166, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 11 Jul 2009.
    5. Grant Samkin & Annika Schneider, 2008. "Adding scientific rigour to qualitative data analysis: an illustrative example," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(3), pages 207-238, October.
    6. Vassili Joannides, 2011. "Influences de la pré-connaissance sur le design de la recherche:le cas des liens entre comptabilité et gestion," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 14(4), pages 91-127, December.
    7. Ken Crofts & Jayne Bisman, 2010. "Interrogating accountability," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 180-207, June.
    8. Jiajie Du & Aaron Bruhn & Bronwen Whiting, 2020. "Observations of supervisors and an actuarial research student on the qualitative research process," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2339-2360, September.
    9. Parker, Lee D., 2012. "Qualitative management accounting research: Assessing deliverables and relevance," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 54-70.
    10. Maria Steinmeier, 2016. "Fraud in Sustainability Departments? An Exploratory Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 477-492, October.
    11. Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2016. "Innovation in Public Sector Management Control Systems in the Context of New Public Management: A Case of an Australian Public Sector Organization," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(4), pages 99-125.
    12. Enrico Bracci, 2013. "Inter-Organizational Accountability and Budget Cut-Backs," Working Papers 2013152, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    13. Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2019. "Influence of New Public Management Philosophy On Risk Management, Fraud and Corruption Control and Internal Audit: Evidence from an Australian Public Sector Organization," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 486-508, December.
    14. Mourey Damien & Eynaud Philippe & Cordery Carolyn, 2013. "The Impact of Governmental Policy on the Effective Operation of CSOs: A French Case Study," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 169-193, December.
    15. Michael Grothe-Hammer, 2017. "Preparing for the Field by Topics: A Systems Theory Inspired Strategy for Improving Social Access," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 41-50, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:2158244014552425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.