IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221091263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work Motivation in the Public Service: A Scale Development Based on the Self-Determination Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Chengwei Xu

Abstract

Work motivation in the public service (WMPS) was proposed to address street-level bureaucrats’ work motivation based on the self-determination theory (SDT). Using mixed methods, the present study developed the WMPS scale within a Chinese context. A series of analyses supported the construct validity, reliability, content validity, convergent and discriminant validity, and criterion validity of the WMPS scale. The scale includes 20 scale items in six dimensions: intrinsic motivation, identified regulation, instrumental regulation, introjected regulation, external regulation, and amotivation. Correlation analysis demonstrated that a supportive work climate such as perceived autonomy and relatedness would positively associate with autonomous motivation and negatively associate with controlled motivation and amotivation. Besides, autonomous motivation was positively associated with positive outcomes such as higher job satisfaction and lower turnover intention, while external regulation and amotivation were more likely to relate to negative outcomes (e.g., lower job satisfaction and higher turnover intention). This study contributes to the literature by providing a theory-based measurement instrument for future studies on public employees’ motivation and work-related behavioral outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengwei Xu, 2022. "Work Motivation in the Public Service: A Scale Development Based on the Self-Determination Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221091263
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221091263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221091263
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221091263?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James L. Perry, 2014. "The motivational bases of public service: foundations for a third wave of research," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 34-47, January.
    2. Assel Mussagulova & Zeger van der Wal, 2021. "“All still quiet on the non-Western front?” Non-Western public service motivation scholarship: 2015–2020," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 23-46, January.
    3. Mohsen Joshanloo, 2016. "Revisiting the Empirical Distinction Between Hedonic and Eudaimonic Aspects of Well-Being Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 2023-2036, October.
    4. Chung-An Chen & Barry Bozeman, 2013. "Understanding Public and Nonprofit Managers' Motivation Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 584-607, May.
    5. Eric Brunelle & Jo-Annie Fortin, 2021. "Distance Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: An Examination of Teleworkers’ and Office Workers’ Job Satisfaction Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, February.
    6. Peterson, Robert A, 1994. "A Meta-analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(2), pages 381-391, September.
    7. Barney, Jay B. & Zhang, Shujun, 2009. "The Future of Chinese Management Research: A Theory of Chinese Management versus A Chinese Theory of Management," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 15-28, March.
    8. Hollebeek, Linda D. & Glynn, Mark S. & Brodie, Roderick J., 2014. "Consumer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development and Validation," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 149-165.
    9. Haya Kaplan, 2021. "Promoting Optimal Induction to Beginning Teachers Using Self-Determination Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    10. Junwei Zheng & Xueqin Gou & Hongyang Li & Hongtao Xie, 2021. "Differences in Mechanisms Linking Motivation and Turnover Intention for Public and Private Employees: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paulin Tay Straughan & Chengwei Xu, 2022. "Parents’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Childhood Obesity in Singapore," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph A. Cazier & Benjamin B. M. Shao & Robert D. St. Louis, 2007. "Sharing information and building trust through value congruence," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 9(5), pages 515-529, November.
    2. Monica Aureliana Petcu & Maria Iulia Sobolevschi-David & Adrian Anica-Popa & Stefania Cristina Curea & Catalina Motofei & Ana-Maria Popescu, 2021. "Multidimensional Assessment of Job Satisfaction in Telework Conditions. Case Study: Romania in the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Haase, Janina & Wiedmann, Klaus-Peter & Labenz, Franziska, 2022. "Brand hate, rage, anger & co.: Exploring the relevance and characteristics of negative consumer emotions toward brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-16.
    4. Sirén, Charlotta & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Stretching strategic learning to the limit: The interaction between strategic planning and learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 653-663.
    5. Huarng, Kun-Huang & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang & Lee, Cheng fang, 2022. "Adoption model of healthcare wearable devices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Yoonsun Oh & Jungsuk Oh, 2017. "A critical incident approach to consumer response in the smartphone market: product, service and contents," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 577-597, August.
    7. Robiady, Nurlita Devian & Windasari, Nila Armelia & Nita, Arfenia, 2021. "Customer engagement in online social crowdfunding: The influence of storytelling technique on donation performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 492-500.
    8. Bruneau, Virginie & Swaen, Valérie & Zidda, Pietro, 2018. "Are loyalty program members really engaged? Measuring customer engagement with loyalty programs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 144-158.
    9. Juan Sandoval-Reyes & Sandra Idrovo-Carlier & Edison Jair Duque-Oliva, 2021. "Remote Work, Work Stress, and Work–Life during Pandemic Times: A Latin America Situation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-12, July.
    10. Anna Borawska & Mariusz Borawski & Małgorzata Łatuszyńska, 2022. "Effectiveness of Electricity-Saving Communication Campaigns: Neurophysiological Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Coelho, Pedro Simões & Rita, Paulo & Santos, Zélia Raposo, 2018. "On the relationship between consumer-brand identification, brand community, and brand loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 101-110.
    12. Maria Naether & Janine Stratmann & Christina Bendfeldt & Ludwig Theuvsen, 2015. "Wodurch wird die Arbeitszufriedenheit landwirtschaftlicher Arbeitnehmer beeinflusst?," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 8(1), pages 85-96.
    13. Wang, Tien & Lee, Fu-Yu, 2020. "Examining customer engagement and brand intimacy in social media context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. S. Rajeswari & Yarlagadda Srinivasulu & S. Thiyagarajan, 2017. "Relationship among Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty: With Special Reference to Wireline Telecom Sector (DSL Service)," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(4), pages 1041-1058, August.
    15. Su Jin Kang & Wonseok Seo, 2020. "The Effects of Multilayered Disorder Characteristics on Fear of Crime in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Dessart, Laurence & Pitardi, Valentina, 2019. "How stories generate consumer engagement: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 183-195.
    17. Kunal Swani & Lauren I. Labrecque, 2020. "Like, Comment, or Share? Self-presentation vs. brand relationships as drivers of social media engagement choices," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 279-298, September.
    18. Tony Cooper & Constantino Stavros & Angela R. Dobele, 2019. "The levers of engagement: an exploration of governance in an online brand community," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 240-254, May.
    19. Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Vivona, Roberto, 2021. "Depoliticizing the European immigration debate: How to employ public sector innovation to integrate migrants," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    20. Qayyum, Abdul & Jamil, Raja Ahmed & Shah, Adnan Muhammad & Lee, KangYoon, 2023. "Inclusive advertising featuring disability on instagram: Effect on consumer well-being, brand engagement, and purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221091263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.