IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v239y2025i6p1281-1295.html

Attack-defense game of interdependent infrastructure systems considering cascading failures

Author

Listed:
  • Yanfang Wu
  • Peng Guo
  • Ying Wang
  • Enrico Zio

Abstract

Interdependent infrastructure networks (IINs) are increasingly vulnerable to potential threats from terrorist activities, which can severely disrupt their performance. The dynamic interactions between intelligent attackers and defenders are crucial in determining the resilience of IINs. Based on game theory and complex network theory, this paper proposes a Stackelberg attack-defense game model considering cascading failures. The proposed two-player game model prioritizes the actions of the defender, with the attacker adopting the role of a follower who formulates a response to the defender’s moves. The strategies and payoffs are defined based on the vulnerability of IINs under disruptions, accounting for cascading failures both within individual networks and between heterogeneous networks. An interdependent power and gas network is applied to explore equilibrium strategies and expected payoffs for both the attacker and defender. Simulation results reveal the importance of considering cascading effects from a network perspective when evaluating the performance of IINs. The findings demonstrate that narrowing the importance gap between nodes is an effective strategy for enhancing system resilience and mitigating the impact of attacks. The equilibrium strategies derived from this model offer valuable insights for improving the resilience of IINs against disruptive events.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanfang Wu & Peng Guo & Ying Wang & Enrico Zio, 2025. "Attack-defense game of interdependent infrastructure systems considering cascading failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 239(6), pages 1281-1295, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:6:p:1281-1295
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X251336007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X251336007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X251336007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunt, Kyle & Zhuang, Jun, 2024. "A review of attacker-defender games: Current state and paths forward," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 401-417.
    2. Zio, E. & Golea, L.R. & Sansavini, G., 2012. "Optimizing protections against cascades in network systems: A modified binary differential evolution algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 72-83.
    3. Wang, Shuliang & Sun, Jingya & Zhang, Jianhua & Dong, Qiqi & Gu, Xifeng & Chen, Chen, 2023. "Attack-Defense game analysis of critical infrastructure network based on Cournot model with fixed operating nodes," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    4. Francesco Di Maio & Chiara Pettorossi & Enrico Zio, 2023. "Entropy-driven Monte Carlo simulation method for approximating the survival signature of complex infrastructures," Post-Print hal-04103855, HAL.
    5. Han, Fangyuan & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "A multi-perspective framework of analysis of critical infrastructures with respect to supply service, controllability and topology," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-13.
    6. Jonas Johansson & Henrik Hassel & Alexander Cedergren, 2011. "Vulnerability analysis of interdependent critical infrastructures: case study of the Swedish railway system," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4), pages 289-316.
    7. Zhang, Xiaoxiong & Ding, Song & Ge, Bingfeng & Xia, Boyuan & Pedrycz, Witold, 2021. "Resource allocation among multiple targets for a defender-attacker game with false targets consideration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    8. Hausken, Kjell, 2017. "Defense and attack for interdependent systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 582-591.
    9. Johansson, Jonas & Hassel, Henrik, 2010. "An approach for modelling interdependent infrastructures in the context of vulnerability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(12), pages 1335-1344.
    10. Fang, Yi-Ping & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "An adaptive robust framework for the optimization of the resilience of interdependent infrastructures under natural hazards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 1119-1136.
    11. Bellè, Andrea & Zeng, Zhiguo & Duval, Carole & Sango, Marc & Barros, Anne, 2022. "Modeling and vulnerability analysis of interdependent railway and power networks: Application to British test systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    12. Fang, Yiping & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2017. "Optimizing power system investments and resilience against attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 161-173.
    13. Kjell Hausken, 2019. "Defence and attack of complex interdependent systems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(3), pages 364-376, March.
    14. Li, Yapeng & Qiao, Shun & Deng, Ye & Wu, Jun, 2019. "Stackelberg game in critical infrastructures from a network science perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 705-714.
    15. Yi‐Ping Fang & Giovanni Sansavini & Enrico Zio, 2019. "An Optimization‐Based Framework for the Identification of Vulnerabilities in Electric Power Grids Exposed to Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1949-1969, September.
    16. Galvan, Giulio & Agarwal, Jitendra, 2020. "Assessing the vulnerability of infrastructure networks based on distribution measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    17. Ouyang, Min, 2014. "Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 43-60.
    18. Zhang, Hui & Ouyang, Min & Wu, Shengyu & Hong, Liu, 2019. "Simplified operation models of integrated power and gas systems for vulnerability analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 531(C).
    19. Ouyang, Min, 2017. "A mathematical framework to optimize resilience of interdependent critical infrastructure systems under spatially localized attacks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1072-1084.
    20. Dileep, G., 2020. "A survey on smart grid technologies and applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2589-2625.
    21. Beyza, Jesus & Ruiz-Paredes, Hector F. & Garcia-Paricio, Eduardo & Yusta, Jose M., 2020. "Assessing the criticality of interdependent power and gas systems using complex networks and load flow techniques," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    22. Di Maio, Francesco & Pettorossi, Chiara & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Entropy-driven Monte Carlo simulation method for approximating the survival signature of complex infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    23. Karakoc, Deniz Berfin & Barker, Kash & González, Andrés D., 2023. "Analyzing the tradeoff between vulnerability and recoverability investments for interdependent infrastructure networks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Yanfang & Guo, Peng & Wang, Ying & Zio, Enrico, 2025. "Attack-defense game modeling framework from a vulnerability perspective to protect critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    2. Bellè, Andrea & Abdin, Adam F. & Fang, Yi-Ping & Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne, 2023. "A resilience-based framework for the optimal coupling of interdependent critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Li, Qing & Li, Mingchu & Gong, Zhongqiang & Tian, Yuan & Zhang, Runfa, 2022. "Locating and protecting interdependent facilities to hedge against multiple non-cooperative limited choice attackers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Bellè, Andrea & Abdin, Adam F. & Fang, Yi-Ping & Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne, 2023. "A data-driven distributionally robust approach for the optimal coupling of interdependent critical infrastructures under random failures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 872-889.
    5. Wu, Yanfang & Guo, Peng & Wang, Ying & Zio, Enrico & Wu, Jianzhang, 2026. "Attack-defense game model for interdependent power-gas networks considering cascading failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 267(PB).
    6. Ouyang, Min & Pan, ZheZhe & Hong, Liu & He, Yue, 2015. "Vulnerability analysis of complementary transportation systems with applications to railway and airline systems in China," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 248-257.
    7. Jingjing Kong & Slobodan P. Simonovic & Chao Zhang, 2019. "Resilience Assessment of Interdependent Infrastructure Systems: A Case Study Based on Different Response Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-31, November.
    8. Linn Svegrup & Jonas Johansson & Henrik Hassel, 2019. "Integration of Critical Infrastructure and Societal Consequence Models: Impact on Swedish Power System Mitigation Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1970-1996, September.
    9. Zhang, Jingru & Fang, Zhigeng & Dong, Wenjie & Xiahou, Tangfan, 2026. "Deriving the optimal defense resource deployment: Modeling cascading effect and contest intensity in an attacker–defender game," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 266(PB).
    10. Li, Zhe & Liu, Jin & Ren, Jiaqi & Dong, Yibo & Li, Weili, 2024. "Application of hybrid strategies of complex network attack and defense games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 189(P1).
    11. Fang, Yi-Ping & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "An adaptive robust framework for the optimization of the resilience of interdependent infrastructures under natural hazards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 1119-1136.
    12. Ghorbani-Renani, Nafiseh & González, Andrés D. & Barker, Kash & Morshedlou, Nazanin, 2020. "Protection-interdiction-restoration: Tri-level optimization for enhancing interdependent network resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    13. Wang, Hongping & Fang, Yi-Ping & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Resilience-oriented optimal post-disruption reconfiguration for coupled traffic-power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    14. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2019. "Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Hausken, Kjell, 2024. "Fifty Years of Operations Research in Defense," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(2), pages 355-368.
    16. Rui Peng & Di Wu & Mengyao Sun & Shaomin Wu, 2021. "An attack-defense game on interdependent networks," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(10), pages 2331-2341, October.
    17. Rachunok, Benjamin & Nateghi, Roshanak, 2020. "The sensitivity of electric power infrastructure resilience to the spatial distribution of disaster impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Chu, Xiaolei & Wang, Ziqi, 2025. "Maximum entropy-based modeling of community-level hazard responses for civil infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    19. Ilalokhoin, Ohis & Pant, Raghav & Hall, Jim W., 2023. "A model and methodology for resilience assessment of interdependent rail networks – Case study of Great Britain's rail network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    20. Moglen, Rachel L. & Leibowicz, Benjamin D. & Kwasinski, Alexis, 2025. "The value of coordination for restoring power and wireless communication networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:6:p:1281-1295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.