IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v238y2024i6p1195-1208.html

Toward safer aviation: Application of GA-XGBoost-SHAP for incident cognition and model explainability

Author

Listed:
  • Minglan Xiong
  • Huawei Wang
  • Changchang Che
  • Ruiguan Lin

Abstract

Flight incidents are characterized by complex mechanisms, leading to poor prediction model robustness and explainability. Based on the full-dimensional description of flight incidents, the explainable module is added to the prediction model to achieve its accuracy, stability, and explainability. Firstly, imbalance processing is performed employing the sampling method, and a genetic algorithm (GA) is applied for feature selection; these results are then considered as prediction model input. Secondly, an extreme gradient boosting algorithm (XGBoost)-based incident severity prediction model is established with five categories of none, minor, serious, fatal, and total as prediction labels; real data is used for validation, and the model shows good robustness and superiority. Finally, the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) is introduced to explain the correlation between incidents severity and input features and to measure feature importance. The results show that the proposed method has higher prediction accuracy and robustness. Which can provide some decision-making reference for aviation operation management departments to emergencies, learn the deep-seated law of incidents, and promote the paradigm of active safety management.

Suggested Citation

  • Minglan Xiong & Huawei Wang & Changchang Che & Ruiguan Lin, 2024. "Toward safer aviation: Application of GA-XGBoost-SHAP for incident cognition and model explainability," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 238(6), pages 1195-1208, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:6:p:1195-1208
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X231205498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X231205498
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X231205498?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu, Hongxia & Li, Xing, 2019. "On the chaos analysis and prediction of aircraft accidents based on multi-timescales," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    2. Li, Max Z. & Ryerson, Megan S. & Balakrishnan, Hamsa, 2019. "Topological data analysis for aviation applications," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 149-174.
    3. Chen, Chen-Cheng & Chen, Jenny & Lin, Pei-Chun, 2009. "Identification of significant threats and errors affecting aviation safety in Taiwan using the analytical hierarchy process," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 261-263.
    4. Rios Insua, D. & Alfaro, C. & Gomez, J. & Hernandez-Coronado, P. & Bernal, F., 2018. "A framework for risk management decisions in aviation safety at state level," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 74-82.
    5. Janic, Milan, 2000. "An assessment of risk and safety in civil aviation," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 43-50.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jun & Qu, Ziyi & Zang, Haoyu & Bai, Kaiyu & Tian, Lijie & Zhang, Rui, 2026. "VMD-BiGRU-ATT architecture for aviation failure events prediction based on the grey wolf optimization algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 267(PB).
    2. Tüzün Tolga İnan & Neslihan Gökmen İnan, 2022. "The analysis of fatal aviation accidents more than 100 dead passengers: an application of machine learning," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(4), pages 1377-1395, December.
    3. Ewa DUDEK & Karolina KRZYKOWSKA-PIOTROWSKA & Mirosław SIERGIEJCZYK, 2020. "Risk Management In (Air) Transport With Exemplary Risk Analysis Based On The Tolerability Matrix," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 15(2), pages 143-156, June.
    4. Kwabena Asomanin Anaman & Ruth Quaye & Bernice Owusu-Brown, 2017. "Benefits of Aviation Weather Services: A Review of International Literature," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(1), pages 45-58, June.
    5. Li, Hongtao & Gedikli, Ersegun Deniz & Lubbad, Raed, 2020. "Exploring time-delay-based numerical differentiation using principal component analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 556(C).
    6. Chang, Chiung-Ting, 2017. "Risk factors associated with flying in adverse weather: From the passengers' point of view," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 68-75.
    7. Salter, Mark B., 2007. "SeMS and sensibility: Security management systems and the management of risk in the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 389-398.
    8. Fu, Yan-Kai & Chan, Tsung-Lung, 2014. "A conceptual evaluation framework for organisational safety culture: An empirical study of Taipei Songshan Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 101-108.
    9. Lai, Li-Hua, 2008. "An evaluation of fuzzy transportation underwriting systematic risk," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1231-1237, November.
    10. Guo, Manze & Cao, Danni & Peng, Yongxin & Janson, Bruce, 2026. "Decoding the impact of extreme weather on aviation safety and economic losses using the SELENA-Net deep learning model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 267(PA).
    11. Chen, Jeng-Chung & Lin, Shu-Chiang & Yu, Vincent F., 2017. "Structuring an effective human error intervention strategy selection model for commercial aviation," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 65-75.
    12. Chang, Yu-Hern & Yeh, Chung-Hsing, 2001. "Evaluating airline competitiveness using multiattribute decision making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 405-415, October.
    13. Arnold Barnett, 2020. "Aviation Safety: A Whole New World?," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 84-96, January.
    14. Chen, Jeng-Chung & Yu, Vincent F., 2018. "Relationship between human error intervention strategies and unsafe acts: The role of strategy implementability," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 112-122.
    15. Delbari, Seyyed Ali & Ng, Siew Imm & Aziz, Yuhanis Abdul & Ho, Jo Ann, 2016. "An investigation of key competitiveness indicators and drivers of full-service airlines using Delphi and AHP techniques," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 23-34.
    16. Chang, Yu-Hern & Yeh, Chung-Hsing, 2004. "A new airline safety index," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 369-383, May.
    17. Jane Fox, Sarah, 2022. "Drones: Foreseeing a 'risky' business?Policing the challenge that flies above," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    18. Dong, Youheng & Zhao, Geng, 2021. "A spatiotemporal chaotic system based on pseudo-random coupled map lattices and elementary cellular automata," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    19. Ismanto Heri & Hartono Hartono & Marfai Muh Aris, 2019. "Spatiotemporal visibility characteristics impacted by forest and land fire over airports in sumatera and borneo Island, Indonesia," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 38(3), pages 5-16, September.
    20. Ivano Bongiovanni & Cameron Newton, 2019. "Toward an Epidemiology of Safety and Security Risks: An Organizational Vulnerability Assessment in International Airports," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(6), pages 1281-1297, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:6:p:1195-1208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.