IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/revmar/v14y2022i1p53-63.html

Role of Democratic Decentralisation and Empowerment of Local Bodies: A Case of Kerala

Author

Listed:
  • K.S. Hari

Abstract

Kerala, the southernmost state of India, known for its unique development experience, has scripted another success story in the empowerment of local bodies. Through institutional reforms in devolution of powers, responsibilities and funds to the local governments, the state ensured successful transition from that of centralised to decentralised planning in the last 25 years. The present article is an attempt to understand the contributory factors for success of Kerala’s decentralisation experience and the challenges ahead. Direct participation of people in the plan formulation through gram sabha ensured deepening of democracy in the state. This helped improvement in the service delivery at the local level in education and health care sectors and better management of sanitation. Women empowerment through Kudumbashree Mission continues to be a role model for other states to emulate. Failure in the inclusion of outlier classes and castes even after 25 years continues as a black spot on the Kerala experience with democratic decentralisation.

Suggested Citation

  • K.S. Hari, 2022. "Role of Democratic Decentralisation and Empowerment of Local Bodies: A Case of Kerala," Review of Market Integration, India Development Foundation, vol. 14(1), pages 53-63, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:revmar:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:53-63
    DOI: 10.1177/09749292221102220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09749292221102220
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09749292221102220?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heller, Patrick & Harilal, K.N. & Chaudhuri, Shubham, 2007. "Building Local Democracy: Evaluating the Impact of Decentralization in Kerala, India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 626-648, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abu Elias Sarker & Faraha Nawaz, 2019. "Clientelism, Partyarchy and Democratic Backsliding: A Case Study of Local Government Elections in Bangladesh," South Asian Survey, , vol. 26(1), pages 70-91, March.
    2. Caroline Patsias & Anne Latendresse & Laurence Bherer, 2013. "Participatory Democracy, Decentralization and Local Governance: the Montreal Participatory Budget in the light of ‘Empowered Participatory Governance’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2214-2230, November.
    3. Gore, Radhika, 2021. "Ensuring the ordinary: Politics and public service in municipal primary care in India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Duncan McDuie-RA, 2008. "Between National Security and Ethno-nationalism," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 3(2), pages 185-210, October.
    5. George,Siddharth & Rao,Vijayendra & Sharan,M. R., 2024. "Two Hundred and Fifty-Thousand Democracies : A Review of Village Government in India," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10793, The World Bank.
    6. Saguin, Kidjie, 2018. "Why the poor do not benefit from community-driven development: Lessons from participatory budgeting," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 220-232.
    7. Jafar, K, 2014. "A Note on Peoples’ Planning Initiative -Possible lessons from the Kerala Experience," MPRA Paper 65610, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Shoba Arun & Thankom Arun, 2023. "Cracking IT: Negotiating Working-Class Gender Capital through Group Enterprises in India," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(4), pages 823-840, August.
    9. Melisa Ross, 2025. "Liberal and Deliberative Democracy in the Global South: Models, Functions, Practices," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    10. de Renzio, Paolo & Wehner, Joachim, 2017. "The impacts of fiscal openness," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 82521, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Fischer, Harry W. & Ali, Syed Shoaib, 2019. "Reshaping the public domain: Decentralization, the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), and trajectories of local democracy in rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 147-158.
    12. Tiangboho SANOGO, 2017. "Does fiscal decentralization enhance citizens’ access to public services and reduce poverty? Evidence from a conflict setting," Working Papers 201715, CERDI.
    13. Cong Minh Huynh & Tan Loi Nguyen & Thi Huong Tra Lam, 2023. "Fiscal decentralization and income inequality in OECD countries: does shadow economy matter?," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(3), pages 515-533, December.
    14. Dutta, Anwesha & Fischer, Harry W., 2021. "The local governance of COVID-19: Disease prevention and social security in rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Malik Altaf Hussain & Malvika Tyagi, 2020. "Role of political connections in land investment: evidence from rural India," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 344-362, September.
    16. Harry Blair, 2018. "Citizen Participation and Political Accountability for Public Service Delivery in India," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 13(1), pages 54-81, April.
    17. Roma Ranu Dash & Anupama AR, 2023. "Micro models of COVID 19 pandemic governance: Reflections on the strategies taken by two states in India," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(2), pages 141-149, May.
    18. Bland, Gary, 2011. "Supporting Post-conflict Democratic Development? External Promotion of Participatory Budgeting in El Salvador," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 863-873, May.
    19. Glyn Williams & Umesh Omanakuttan & J Devika & N Jagajeevan, 2019. "Planning a ‘slum free' Trivandrum: Housing upgrade and the rescaling of urban governance in India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(2), pages 256-276, March.
    20. Prince Osei-Wusu Adjei & Frank Kwaku Agyei & Joyce Osei Adjei, 2020. "Decentralized forest governance and community representation outcomes: analysis of the modified taungya system in Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1187-1209, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:revmar:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:53-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.idfresearch.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.