IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/prodev/v19y2019i4p243-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Translating religion and development: Emerging perspectives from critical ethnographies of faith-based organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Bolotta

    (Durham University, United Kingdom)

  • Catherine Scheer

    (Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient, Paris)

  • R. Michael Feener

    (University of Oxford, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Since the turn of the twenty-first century, there has been a remarkable surge of interest among both policy makers and academics on religion and its engagements with development. Within this context, ‘religious non-governmental organizations (RNGOs)’ or ‘faith-based organizations’ (FBOs) have garnered considerable attention. Early attempts to understand FBOs often took the form of typological mapping exercises, the cumulative effect of which has been the construction of a field of ‘RNGOs’ that can be analysed as distinct from—and possibly put into the service of—the work of purportedly secular development actors. However, such typologies imply problematic distinctions between over-determined imaginations of separate spheres of ‘religion’ and ‘development’. In this article, we innovatively extend the potential of ethnographic approaches highlighting aspects of ‘brokerage’ and ‘translation’ to FBOs and identify new, productive tensions of convergent analysis. These, we argue, provide original possibilities of comparison and meta-analysis to explore contemporary entanglements of religion and development. This article was written as part of a broader research project on Religion and NGOs in Asia. We are grateful to the Henry R. Luce Initiative on Religion in International Affairs at the Henry Luce Foundation for their generous support of this research. We would also like to thank Philip Fountain and other members of the National University of Singapore’s Asia Research Institute for stimulating conversations that have informed our thinking in this article, and the anonymous reviewers for PIDS who have helped us to improve on earlier drafts.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Bolotta & Catherine Scheer & R. Michael Feener, 2019. "Translating religion and development: Emerging perspectives from critical ethnographies of faith-based organizations," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 19(4), pages 243-263, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:19:y:2019:i:4:p:243-263
    DOI: 10.1177/1464993419862453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1464993419862453
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1464993419862453?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara Czarniawska, 2012. "Operational Risk, Translation, and Globalization," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 6(2), June.
    2. Ben Jones & Marie Petersen, 2011. "Instrumental, Narrow, Normative? Reviewing recent work on religion and development," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7), pages 1291-1306.
    3. Barnett, Michael & Stein, Janice, 2012. "Sacred Aid: Faith and Humanitarianism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199916092.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adam Moe Fejerskov & Dane Fetterer, 2021. "Disrupting Development? A Situated Perspective on Technology and Innovation in Global Development," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 21(3), pages 231-243, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Bompani, 2019. "Religion and development: Tracing the trajectories of an evolving sub-discipline," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 19(3), pages 171-185, July.
    2. Evren Tok & Abdurahman J. Yesuf & Abdulfatah Mohamed, 2022. "Sustainable Development Goals and Islamic Social Finance: From Policy Divide to Policy Coherence and Convergence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Smith, Jonathan D., 2017. "Positioning Missionaries in Development Studies, Policy, and Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 63-76.
    4. Marie Juul Petersen, 2018. "Translating global gender norms in Islamic Relief Worldwide," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 18(3), pages 189-207, July.
    5. Chaudhry Ghafran & Sofia Yasmin, 2020. "Ethical Governance: Insight from the Islamic Perspective and an Empirical Enquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 513-533, December.
    6. Beamond, Maria Teresa & Farndale, Elaine & Härtel, Charmine E.J., 2016. "MNE translation of corporate talent management strategies to subsidiaries in emerging economies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 499-510.
    7. Kaja Borchgrevink & Marta Bivand Erdal, 2017. "With faith in development: Organizing transnational Islamic charity," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 17(3), pages 214-228, July.
    8. Deneulin, Séverine & Zampini-Davies, Augusto, 2017. "Engaging development and religion: Methodological groundings," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 110-121.
    9. Samta P. Pandya, 2016. "Sect Culture and Social Service," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440156, January.
    10. Udo Broll & Anna Sobiech & Jack E. Wahl, 2012. "Banking Firm, Equity and Value at Risk," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 6(4), December.
    11. Corné J. Rademaker & Henk Jochemsen, 2019. "Faith in international agricultural development: Conservation Agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 199-212, June.
    12. Adam Moe Fejerskov, 2018. "Development as resistance and translation: Remaking norms and ideas of the Gates Foundation," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 18(2), pages 126-143, April.
    13. Jung Wan Lee & Tantatape Brahmasrene, 2020. "Exchange Rate Movements and Structural Break on China FDI Inflows," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 14(2), June.
    14. Adam Moe Fejerskov & Erik Lundsgaarde & Signe Cold-Ravnkilde, 2017. "Recasting the ‘New Actors in Development’ Research Agenda," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1070-1085, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:19:y:2019:i:4:p:243-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.