IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/prodev/v19y2019i3p211-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contested norms in fragmented institutions: Gender equality in South Africa’s development cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Signe Marie Cold-Ravnkilde

    (Danish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

Engaging with gender equality norms is increasingly becoming a prerequisite for being considered a legitimate partner in international development cooperation. South Africa has often been acknowledged as having one of the world’s most progressive constitutions for promoting gender equality. However, gender equality norms are heavily contested in the national political context. Situated in the gap between policy and implementation, this article explores how South Africa engages with gender equality norms as a leading actor in South–South Cooperation. It argues that contestations in competing normative environments and organizational restructuring processes are impeding the push for a policy guiding gender equality work in South Africa’s development cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Signe Marie Cold-Ravnkilde, 2019. "Contested norms in fragmented institutions: Gender equality in South Africa’s development cooperation," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 19(3), pages 211-231, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:19:y:2019:i:3:p:211-231
    DOI: 10.1177/1464993419853444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1464993419853444
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1464993419853444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Veen,A. Maurits, 2011. "Ideas, Interests and Foreign Aid," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521264099.
    2. van der Veen,A. Maurits, 2011. "Ideas, Interests and Foreign Aid," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107009745.
    3. Catherine Albertyn, 2011. "Law, Gender and Inequality in South Africa," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 139-162.
    4. Adam Moe Fejerskov & Erik Lundsgaarde & Signe Cold-Ravnkilde, 2017. "Recasting the ‘New Actors in Development’ Research Agenda," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1070-1085, November.
    5. Lars Engberg-Pedersen, 2016. "Policy Making in Foreign Aid: Gender Equality and Danish Development Policy," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(7), pages 933-949, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Signe Marie Cold-Ravnkilde & Lars Engberg-Pedersen & Adam Moe Fejerskov, 2018. "Global norms and heterogeneous development organizations," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 18(2), pages 77-94, April.
    2. Lars Engberg-Pedersen, 2018. "Do norms travel? The case of gender in Danish development cooperation," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 18(3), pages 153-171, July.
    3. Alonso José Antonio, 2018. "Development Cooperation to Ensure that none be Left Behind," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Suzuki, Mao, 2020. "Profits before patients? Analyzing donors’ economic motives for foreign aid in the health sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Souha El Khanji, 2022. "Donors’ Interest in Water and Sanitation Subsectors," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(2), pages 611-654, April.
    6. Desha M. Girod, 2015. "Reducing postconflict coup risk: The low windfall coup-proofing hypothesis," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(2), pages 153-174, April.
    7. Unceta Satrustegui, Koldo & Gutiérrez-Goiria, Jorge, 2012. "Identidad y legitimidad de la cooperación al desarrollo: El debate sobre la relación de la AOD con la pobreza y la desigualdad internacional/Identity and Legitimacy of Development Cooperation: The Deb," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 30, pages 773-800, Diciembre.
    8. Beletskaya, M., 2019. "Bilateral International Assistance: Factors for Donor Countries," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 43(3), pages 95-114.
    9. Regilme Salvador Santino, 2023. "United States Foreign Aid and Multilateralism Under the Trump Presidency," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 45-69, April.
    10. Jisun Yi, 2015. "A New Institutionalist Analysis on Emerging Donorship: Explaining the Rise of the Knowledge Dimension in the South Korean Aid Regime," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2015-055, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. JoseÌ Antonio Alonso, 2018. "Development cooperation to ensure that none be left behind," CDP Background Papers 039, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    12. Heinrich, Tobias & Kobayashi, Yoshiharu & Bryant, Kristin A., 2016. "Public Opinion and Foreign Aid Cuts in Economic Crises," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 66-79.
    13. Jisun Yi, 2015. "Lessons for Japanese foreign aid from research on aid's impact," WIDER Working Paper Series 055, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Therese Brolin, 2017. "Framing the results agenda in Swedish development co-operation," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 338-356, October.
    15. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.
    16. Keijzer, Niels & Lundsgaarde, Erik, 2018. "When ‘unintended effects’ reveal hidden intentions: Implications of ‘mutual benefit’ discourses for evaluating development cooperation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 210-217.
    17. Helen Wadham & Cathy Urquhart & Richard Warren, 2019. "Living with Paradox in International Development: An Extended Case Study of an International NGO," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(5), pages 1263-1286, December.
    18. Minna-Liina Ojala & Lauri Hooli, 2022. "Development Cooperation as a Knowledge Creation Process: Rhythmanalytical Approach to a Capacity-Building Project in Zanzibar," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 367-386, February.
    19. Ali, Murad, 2018. "Monitoring and evaluation in South-South Cooperation: the case of CPEC in Pakistan," IDOS Discussion Papers 1/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    20. José Antonio Alonso & Guillermo Santander, 2022. "Triangular Cooperation: Change or Continuity?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 248-271, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:19:y:2019:i:3:p:211-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.