IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/metjou/v24y2025i2p123-130.html

Composite or Component-wise ESG Reporting: A Tangle

Author

Listed:
  • Rajat Deb
  • Anita Behra

Abstract

Non-financial reporting, mainly called environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures, depicts the future corporate plan apart from current corporate actions and is getting substantial attention amongst the corporate world, policymakers, and academics. ESG disclosures indicate how companies can address environmental and social challenges, setting a high standard of governance mechanism. Due to increased ESG awareness, stakeholders expect companies to engage in sustainable practices that could even exceed the mandatory disclosure requirements. Such pressure has compelled companies worldwide to improve their ESG disclosures. ESG rating providers attempt to measure companies’ ESG performance against the benchmark, focusing on the influence of ESG disclosures on financial performance. Although the composite ESG scores have a broader preference in assessing the companies’ comparative performance, those scores are unlikely to depict their real impacts on the stakeholders. Considering the inherent limitations of the composite ESG scores, the present qualitative study motivates the exploration of whether component-wise ESG scores could better address the limitations of the composite ESG scores.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajat Deb & Anita Behra, 2025. "Composite or Component-wise ESG Reporting: A Tangle," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 24(2), pages 123-130, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:metjou:v:24:y:2025:i:2:p:123-130
    DOI: 10.1177/09726225241264618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09726225241264618
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09726225241264618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alaa Aldowaish & Jiro Kokuryo & Othman Almazyad & Hoe Chin Goi, 2024. "How to Manage Conflicts in the Process of ESG Integration? A Case of a Japanese Firm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Jason Zhang & Hong Zhu & Hung-bin Ding, 2013. "Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Investigation in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley Era," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 381-392, May.
    3. Jennifer Francis & Dhananjay Nanda & Per Olsson, 2008. "Voluntary Disclosure, Earnings Quality, and Cost of Capital," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(1), pages 53-99, March.
    4. Nicola Raimo & Alessandra Caragnano & Marianna Zito & Filippo Vitolla & Massimo Mariani, 2021. "Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1412-1421, July.
    5. Diamond, Douglas W & Verrecchia, Robert E, 1991. "Disclosure, Liquidity, and the Cost of Capital," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 46(4), pages 1325-1359, September.
    6. Zabihollah Rezaee & Ling Tuo, 2019. "Are the Quantity and Quality of Sustainability Disclosures Associated with the Innate and Discretionary Earnings Quality?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 763-786, March.
    7. Zhang, Rui & Sharma, Rajesh & Tan, Zhixiong & Kautish, Pradeep, 2022. "Do export diversification and stock market development drive carbon intensity? The role of renewable energy solutions in top carbon emitter countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1318-1328.
    8. Tirthankar Nag & Asish K. Bhattacharyya, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in India: Exploring Linkages with Firm Performance," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(6), pages 1427-1440, December.
    9. Aaron K. Chatterji & David I. Levine & Michael W. Toffel, 2009. "How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 125-169, March.
    10. Stephen Bear & Noushi Rahman & Corinne Post, 2010. "The Impact of Board Diversity and Gender Composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Reputation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 207-221, December.
    11. Giovanni Cardillo & Helen Chiappini, 2022. "The Credit Risk of Sustainable Firms during the Pandemic," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(6), pages 1462-1480, December.
    12. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 32-42, January.
    13. Ketan Mulchandani & Kalyani Mulchandani & Geetha Iyer & Alaknanda Lonare, 2022. "Do Equity Investors Care about Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure Performance? Evidence from India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(6), pages 1336-1352, December.
    14. Verrecchia, Robert E., 1983. "Discretionary disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 179-194, April.
    15. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    16. Renuka Kumawat & Nikunj Patel, 2022. "Are ESG Disclosures Value Relevant? A Panel-Corrected Standard Error (PCSE) Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(6), pages 1558-1573, December.
    17. Sharma, Rajesh & Sinha, Avik & Kautish, Pradeep, 2021. "Do economic endeavors complement sustainability goals in the emerging economies of South and Southeast Asia?," MPRA Paper 108163, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2021.
    18. Beat Reber & Agnes Gold & Stefan Gold, 2022. "ESG Disclosure and Idiosyncratic Risk in Initial Public Offerings," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 867-886, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renuka Kumawat & Nikunj Patel, 2022. "Are ESG Disclosures Value Relevant? A Panel-Corrected Standard Error (PCSE) Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(6), pages 1558-1573, December.
    2. Lutfa Tilat Ferdous & Tarek Rana & Richard Yeboah, 2025. "Decoding the impact of firm‐level ESG performance on financial disclosure quality," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 162-186, January.
    3. Albrecht, Disen Huang & Anantharaman, Divya & Zhao, Keyi, 2025. "Is a picture worth a thousand words? Image usage in ESG reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Rezaee, Zabihollah & Tuo, Ling, 2017. "Voluntary disclosure of non-financial information and its association with sustainability performance," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 47-59.
    5. Gjergji, Rafaela & Vena, Luigi & Campopiano, Giovanna & Sciascia, Salvatore & Cortesi, Alessandro, 2024. "Strategy disclosure and cost of capital: The key role of women directors for family firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).
    6. Gwenael Roudaut, 2017. "The Representation of Managers, Shareholders and other Stakeholders inside the Boardroom: Does it Matter for CSR Commitment? ," Working Papers hal-01623944, HAL.
    7. Ella Mae Matsumura & Rachna Prakash & Sandra C. Vera-Muñoz, 2024. "Climate-risk materiality and firm risk," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 33-74, March.
    8. Oehler, Andreas & Neuss, Charlotte, 2025. "ESG disclosure vs. ESG ratings: Consistent information value?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    9. Claudia Arena & Saverio Bozzolan & Claudia Imperatore, 2024. "Enhancing environmental reporting: A study on the role of narrative disclosure, firm‐ and country‐level incentives," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3414-3428, July.
    10. Ben-Nasr, Hamdi & Ghouma, Hatem, 2018. "Employee welfare and stock price crash risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 700-725.
    11. Francesco Perrini & Angeloantonio Russo & Antonio Tencati & Clodia Vurro, 2011. "Deconstructing the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 59-76, March.
    12. James J. Cordeiro & Giorgia Profumo & Ilaria Tutore, 2020. "Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual‐class majority ownership structures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1127-1144, March.
    13. Mouselli, Sulaiman & Jaafar, Aziz & Hussainey, Khaled, 2012. "Accruals quality vis-à-vis disclosure quality: Substitutes or complements?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 36-46.
    14. Shan Zhou & Roger Simnett & Wendy Green, 2017. "Does Integrated Reporting Matter to the Capital Market?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 53(1), pages 94-132, March.
    15. Mohammad Jizi, 2017. "The Influence of Board Composition on Sustainable Development Disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 640-655, July.
    16. Howell, Dylan A., 2025. "Private information dissemination and the underpricing of seasoned equity offerings," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    17. Adrian, Christofer & Garg, Mukesh & Viet Pham, Anh & Phang, Soon-Yeow & Truong, Cameron, 2022. "Policy and oversight of corporate political activities and the cost of equity capital," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2).
    18. Ann Ling-Ching Chan & Edward Lee & Jirada Petaibanlue & Ning Tan, 2017. "Do board interlocks motivate voluntary disclosure? Evidence from Taiwan," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 441-466, February.
    19. Shiyan Yin & Kai Yao & Thanaset Chevapatrakul & Rong Huang, 2024. "Reduced disclosure and default risk: analysis of smaller reporting companies," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 355-395, July.
    20. Fu, Renhui & Kraft, Arthur & Zhang, Huai, 2012. "Financial reporting frequency, information asymmetry, and the cost of equity," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 132-149.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:metjou:v:24:y:2025:i:2:p:123-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.