IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v37y2022i7p602-621.html

Community wealth building or local authority rhetoric?

Author

Listed:
  • Morag E Redwood
  • Anne MJ Smith
  • Artur Steiner
  • Geoff Whittam

Abstract

We examine the principles, purpose and practice of Community Wealth Building (CWB). Our case study, located in the UK, involves a Local Authority (LA), local community groups and local people, and the implementation of a CWB initiative by the LA. Action research enabled us to scrutinise the LA approach to the CWB initiative in terms of community engagement and consultation. We identified power and control tensions in relationships between the LA and different community groups (including local development trusts) that undermine the theoretical principles of CWB. Examination of these issues through a Bourdieuvian lens reveals the role played by power relations and highlights the need for ‘practical reflexivity’ in any community engagement process especially where institutions are at risk of misinterpreting how CWB might be accomplished in practice. Our study contributes a reflexivity model of CWB for purpose and practice, grounded in ethics, fairness and inclusion, and is of significance to LA initiatives claiming a CWB mission, vision and strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Morag E Redwood & Anne MJ Smith & Artur Steiner & Geoff Whittam, 2022. "Community wealth building or local authority rhetoric?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 37(7), pages 602-621, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:37:y:2022:i:7:p:602-621
    DOI: 10.1177/02690942231171657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02690942231171657
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/02690942231171657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steve Rolfe, 2016. "Divergence in Community Participation Policy: Analysing Localism and Community Empowerment Using a Theory of Change Approach," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 97-118, January.
    2. Matthew Thompson & Alan Southern & Helen Heap, 2022. "Anchoring the social economy at the metropolitan scale: Findings from the Liverpool City Region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 675-697, March.
    3. Frances Bowen & Aloysius Newenham-Kahindi & Irene Herremans, 2010. "When Suits Meet Roots: The Antecedents and Consequences of Community Engagement Strategy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(2), pages 297-318, August.
    4. Ruth Alsop & Mette Bertelsen & Jeremy Holland, 2006. "Empowerment in Practice : From Analysis to Implementation," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6980, April.
    5. Neil Lee, 2019. "Inclusive Growth in cities: a sympathetic critique," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 424-434, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. El-Harizi, Khalid & Klemick, Heather, 2007. "Measuring and accounting for community capabilities in Kordofan, Sudan," IFPRI discussion papers 730, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Alkire, Sabina & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth & Peterman, Amber & Quisumbing, Agnes & Seymour, Greg & Vaz, Ana, 2013. "The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 71-91.
    3. Anna Lee Rowe & Margaret Nowak & Mohammed Quaddus & Marita Naude, 2014. "Stakeholder Engagement and Sustainable Corporate Community Investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(7), pages 461-474, November.
    4. Yuting Zhang & Xiaofen Yu & Ning Cai & Yong Li, 2020. "Analyzing the Employees’ New Media Use in the Energy Industry：The Role of Creative Self-Efficacy, Perceived Usefulness and Leaders’ Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Wole Kinati & Elizabeth C. Temple & Derek Baker & Dina Najjar & Reta Hailu, 2024. "Understanding Agency Within Context: The Case of Breeding Cooperatives Program for Transforming Small Ruminant Value Chain in Ethiopia," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, April.
    6. Sekabira, Haruna & Qaim, Matin, 2017. "Can mobile phones improve gender equality and nutrition? Panel data evidence from farm households in Uganda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 95-103.
    7. Stephen Baffour Adjei, 2015. "Assessing Women Empowerment in Africa," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 27(1), pages 58-80, March.
    8. Borice Augustin Ngounou & Honoré Tekam Oumbe & Bruno Emmanuel Ongo Nkoa & Edmond Noubissi Domguia, 2024. "Inclusive growth in the face of increasing urbanization: What experience for African countries?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 34-70, February.
    9. Silvia Blasi & Edoardo Gobbo & Silvia Rita Sedita, 2022. "Big Data for smart cities and citizen engagement: evidence from Twitter data analysis on Italian municipalities," Working Papers - Business wp2022_01.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    10. Beth Breeze & Pamala Wiepking, 2020. "Different Drivers: Exploring Employee Involvement in Corporate Philanthropy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 453-467, September.
    11. Wakunuma, Kutoma & Masika, Rachel, 2017. "Cloud computing, capabilities and intercultural ethics: Implications for Africa," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 695-707.
    12. Viveros, Hector, 2017. "Unpacking stakeholder mechanisms to influence corporate social responsibility in the mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-12.
    13. Luis Fernando Gamboa & Paul AndrÔøΩs RodrÔøΩguez, 2014. "Do Colombian students underestimate higher education returns?," Documentos de Trabajo 12050, Universidad del Rosario.
    14. Rebecca Tunstall, 2020. "Is Housing Growth Ever Inclusive Growth? Evidence from Three Decades of Housing Development in England and Wales, 1981–2011," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 16-27.
    15. Michael Joseph D’Italia & Adam Okulicz-Kozaryn, 2025. "Constructing General Human Agency Indicators (GHAIs) and a General Personal Agency Scale (GPAS)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 337-411, January.
    16. Leonardo Letelier S. & Héctor Ormeño, 2018. "El mapa de la descentralización fiscal en Chile," Journal Econom a Chilena (The Chilean Economy), Central Bank of Chile, vol. 21(3), pages 004-040, December.
    17. Steve Fothergill & Tony Gore & Peter Wells, 2019. "Industrial strategy and the UK regions: sectorally narrow and spatially blind," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 12(3), pages 445-466.
    18. Stoyan Totev & Milkana Mochurova & Maria Kotseva-Tikova, 2021. "Inclusive regional development – social, economic and environmental dimensions," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 50-65.
    19. Saenz, Cesar, 2021. "Community partnership and ownership as key factors of community strategies. A Peruvian case study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    20. Simplice A. Asongu & Hillary C. Ezeaku, 2020. "Aid Grants vs. Technical Cooperation Grants: Implications for Inclusive Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1984-2018," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 20/091, African Governance and Development Institute..

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:37:y:2022:i:7:p:602-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.