IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v59y2022i4p622-630.html

What is rebel governance? Introducing a new dataset on rebel institutions, 1945–2012

Author

Listed:
  • Karen E Albert

Abstract

In the course of civil war, it is not unusual for armed rebels, who are fighting to either take control of a state or create a new one, to create state-like governing institutions. For example, nearly 64% of rebels between 1945 and 2012 created at least one governing institution. One challenge to moving the literature on rebel governance forward is getting data on the many possible institutions that comprise rebel governance. I introduce new data, the Rebel Quasi-State Institutions dataset, which covers 235 rebel groups and codes annually for 25 institutions during the entire existence of the group. I demonstrate the usefulness of this new dataset by exploring a relationship important to scholars: that of rebel strength and rebel governance institutions ( Stewart, 2020 ). These analyses show two things. First, there is value in disaggregating rebel governance and looking at institutions separately because not all governance institutions are correlated with strength in the same direction. Second, taking into account the time dimension is important. Since rebel conventional capability increased as a result of the end of the Cold War (Kalyvas & Balcells, 2010) and rebel institutions became more prevalent, there is an important time component to rebel governance that correlates with events in the international system.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen E Albert, 2022. "What is rebel governance? Introducing a new dataset on rebel institutions, 1945–2012," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(4), pages 622-630, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:59:y:2022:i:4:p:622-630
    DOI: 10.1177/00223433211051848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00223433211051848
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00223433211051848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fearon, James D. & Laitin, David D., 2003. "Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 97(1), pages 75-90, February.
    2. Ana Arjona, 2014. "Wartime Institutions: A Research Agenda," HiCN Working Papers 169, Households in Conflict Network.
    3. Kalyvas, Stathis N. & Balcells, Laia, 2010. "International System and Technologies of Rebellion: How the End of the Cold War Shaped Internal Conflict," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 104(3), pages 415-429, August.
    4. Stewart, Megan A., 2018. "Civil War as State-Making: Strategic Governance in Civil War," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 72(1), pages 205-226, January.
    5. Megan A Stewart, 2020. "Rebel governance: military boon or military bust? (Isard Award Article)," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(1), pages 16-38, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seden Akcinaroglu & Jeremy Berkowitz & Carlos E. Moreno Leon & Sema Hande Ogutcu-Fu & Evgeny Sedashov & Efe Tokdemir, 2025. "Unique offerings: Ideological competition and rebel governance," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(6), pages 690-712, November.
    2. Guillermo Kreiman, 2025. "Revolutionary days: Introducing the Latin American Guerrillas Dataset," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(2), pages 497-508, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Krcmaric, 2018. "Varieties of civil war and mass killing," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(1), pages 18-31, January.
    2. Christiana Parreira, 2021. "Power politics: Armed non-state actors and the capture of public electricity in post-invasion Baghdad," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(4), pages 749-762, July.
    3. Guillermo Kreiman, 2025. "Revolutionary days: Introducing the Latin American Guerrillas Dataset," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(2), pages 497-508, March.
    4. Mueller, Hannes & Rauh, Christopher, 2018. "Reading Between the Lines: Prediction of Political Violence Using Newspaper Text," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 112(2), pages 358-375, May.
    5. Angulo Amaya, Maria Camila, 2024. "Criminal governance and public resources: The case of paramilitaries and health care provision in Colombia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    6. Austin L. Wright, 2016. "Economic Shocks and Rebel," HiCN Working Papers 232, Households in Conflict Network.
    7. Magnus Lundgren, 2017. "Which type of international organizations can settle civil wars?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 613-641, December.
    8. Agustín Goenaga & Oriol Sabaté & Jan Teorell, 2023. "The state does not live by warfare alone: War and revenue in the long nineteenth century," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 393-418, April.
    9. Andreas Mehltretter, 2022. "Arming for conflict, arming for peace? How small arms imports affect intrastate conflict risk," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(6), pages 637-660, November.
    10. Maria Paula Saffon & Fabio SÔøΩnchez, 2019. "Historical grievances and war dynamics: Old land conflicts as a cause of current forced displacements in Colombia," Documentos CEDE 17320, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    11. Justin Conrad & Liana Eustacia Reyes & Megan A. Stewart, 2022. "Revisiting Opportunism in Civil Conflict: Natural Resource Extraction and Health Care Provision," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(1), pages 91-114, January.
    12. Eric S Mosinger, 2018. "Brothers or others in arms? Civilian constituencies and rebel fragmentation in civil war," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(1), pages 62-77, January.
    13. Seden Akcinaroglu & Jeremy Berkowitz & Carlos E. Moreno Leon & Sema Hande Ogutcu-Fu & Evgeny Sedashov & Efe Tokdemir, 2025. "Unique offerings: Ideological competition and rebel governance," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(6), pages 690-712, November.
    14. Obi Chinasa Ifeoma. & Ezeanyeji, C i. & Obi, C O., 2025. "Analysis of the Impact of Terrorism on Mining Production in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 5524-5532, April.
    15. Helge Holtermann, 2012. "Explaining the Development–Civil War Relationship," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(1), pages 56-78, February.
    16. Mehmet Erdem Arslan, 2025. "Targeting telecommunications: Why do rebel groups target information and communication technology infrastructure?," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(4), pages 945-960, July.
    17. Yuri M. Zhukov, 2014. "Theory of Indiscriminate Violence," Working Paper 365551, Harvard University OpenScholar.
    18. Aguirre, Alvaro, 2016. "The risk of civil conflicts as a determinant of political institutions," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 36-59.
    19. Jannie Lilja & Giulia Ferrari & José Alvarado & Laura-Alina Fabich & Gulzhan Asylbek Kyzy & Leah Kenny & Mazeda Hossain, 2024. "Territorial control by non-state armed groups and gendered access to healthcare in conflict using a new complex adaptive systems framework," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Sakamoto, Takuto, 2013. "Conflict Analysis in Virtual States (CAVS): A New Experimental Method Based on the Extensive Use of Multi-Agent Simulation (MAS) and Geographical Information System (GIS)," Working Papers 56, JICA Research Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:59:y:2022:i:4:p:622-630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.