IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v62y2025i2p497-508.html

Revolutionary days: Introducing the Latin American Guerrillas Dataset

Author

Listed:
  • Guillermo Kreiman

    (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid)

Abstract

The last two decades have witnessed an impressive expansion in the analysis of the causes, dynamics and legacies of internal armed conflicts. However, two relevant limitations persist. First, standard conflict datasets suffer from selection bias. And second, most available data lack a temporal approach that facilitates the analysis of insurgent lifecycles from the inception until the demobilization of non-state armed groups. To partially fill this gap, this article presents a novel dataset on revolutionary socialist insurgencies that were created in Latin America (LA) between 1950 and 2016. The Latin American Guerrillas Dataset (LAGD) covers the actions of 90 guerrilla organizations in 19 countries in the region, including annual level data on a variety of variables, such as level of success, political wings, rebel diplomacy, rebel governance, or number of combatants, among others. The LAGD represents one of the first systematic efforts for collecting comparative evidence on insurgencies operating in LA and should facilitate rigorous analyses on the divergent pathways of armed groups from a processual perspective, while dealing with extant issues of selection bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillermo Kreiman, 2025. "Revolutionary days: Introducing the Latin American Guerrillas Dataset," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(2), pages 497-508, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:62:y:2025:i:2:p:497-508
    DOI: 10.1177/00223433231215751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00223433231215751
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00223433231215751?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karen E Albert, 2022. "What is rebel governance? Introducing a new dataset on rebel institutions, 1945–2012," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(4), pages 622-630, July.
    2. Fearon, James D. & Laitin, David D., 2003. "Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 97(1), pages 75-90, February.
    3. Sophia Dawkins, 2021. "The problem of the missing dead," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(5), pages 1098-1116, September.
    4. Kalyvas, Stathis N. & Balcells, Laia, 2010. "International System and Technologies of Rebellion: How the End of the Cold War Shaped Internal Conflict," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 104(3), pages 415-429, August.
    5. Joel Blaxland, 2021. "Thinking outside the (temporal) box to explain protracted intrastate conflict," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(6), pages 1271-1283, November.
    6. Barbara F. Walter, 2019. "Explaining the number of rebel groups in civil wars," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 1-27, January.
    7. Megan A Stewart, 2020. "Rebel governance: military boon or military bust? (Isard Award Article)," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(1), pages 16-38, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karen E Albert, 2022. "What is rebel governance? Introducing a new dataset on rebel institutions, 1945–2012," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(4), pages 622-630, July.
    2. Mueller, Hannes & Rauh, Christopher, 2018. "Reading Between the Lines: Prediction of Political Violence Using Newspaper Text," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 112(2), pages 358-375, May.
    3. Austin L. Wright, 2016. "Economic Shocks and Rebel," HiCN Working Papers 232, Households in Conflict Network.
    4. Magnus Lundgren, 2017. "Which type of international organizations can settle civil wars?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 613-641, December.
    5. Agustín Goenaga & Oriol Sabaté & Jan Teorell, 2023. "The state does not live by warfare alone: War and revenue in the long nineteenth century," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 393-418, April.
    6. Daniel Krcmaric, 2018. "Varieties of civil war and mass killing," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(1), pages 18-31, January.
    7. Andreas Mehltretter, 2022. "Arming for conflict, arming for peace? How small arms imports affect intrastate conflict risk," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(6), pages 637-660, November.
    8. Eric S Mosinger, 2018. "Brothers or others in arms? Civilian constituencies and rebel fragmentation in civil war," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(1), pages 62-77, January.
    9. Seden Akcinaroglu & Jeremy Berkowitz & Carlos E. Moreno Leon & Sema Hande Ogutcu-Fu & Evgeny Sedashov & Efe Tokdemir, 2025. "Unique offerings: Ideological competition and rebel governance," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(6), pages 690-712, November.
    10. Obi Chinasa Ifeoma. & Ezeanyeji, C i. & Obi, C O., 2025. "Analysis of the Impact of Terrorism on Mining Production in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 5524-5532, April.
    11. Helge Holtermann, 2012. "Explaining the Development–Civil War Relationship," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(1), pages 56-78, February.
    12. Mehmet Erdem Arslan, 2025. "Targeting telecommunications: Why do rebel groups target information and communication technology infrastructure?," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(4), pages 945-960, July.
    13. Yuri M. Zhukov, 2014. "Theory of Indiscriminate Violence," Working Paper 365551, Harvard University OpenScholar.
    14. Aguirre, Alvaro, 2016. "The risk of civil conflicts as a determinant of political institutions," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 36-59.
    15. Sakamoto, Takuto, 2013. "Conflict Analysis in Virtual States (CAVS): A New Experimental Method Based on the Extensive Use of Multi-Agent Simulation (MAS) and Geographical Information System (GIS)," Working Papers 56, JICA Research Institute.
    16. Sebastian Schutte, 2017. "Geographic determinants of indiscriminate violence in civil wars," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(4), pages 380-405, July.
    17. Jesse Hammond, 2018. "Maps of mayhem," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(1), pages 32-46, January.
    18. Albornoz, Facundo & Hauk, Esther, 2014. "Civil war and U.S. foreign influence," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 64-78.
    19. Patricia L. Sullivan & Johannes Karreth, 2015. "The conditional impact of military intervention on internal armed conflict outcomes," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(3), pages 269-288, July.
    20. Martínez, Luis R., 2017. "Transnational insurgents: Evidence from Colombia's FARC at the border with Chávez's Venezuela," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 138-153.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:62:y:2025:i:2:p:497-508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.