IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v47y2022i6p693-735.html

Zero and One Inflated Item Response Theory Models for Bounded Continuous Data

Author

Listed:
  • Dylan Molenaar

    (University of Amsterdam)

  • Mariana Cúri
  • Jorge L. Bazán

Abstract

Bounded continuous data are encountered in many applications of item response theory, including the measurement of mood, personality, and response times and in the analyses of summed item scores. Although different item response theory models exist to analyze such bounded continuous data, most models assume the data to be in an open interval and cannot accommodate data in a closed interval. As a result, ad hoc transformations are needed to prevent scores on the bounds of the observed variables. To motivate the present study, we demonstrate in real and simulated data that this practice of fitting open interval models to closed interval data can majorly affect parameter estimates even in cases with only 5% of the responses on one of the bounds of the observed variables. To address this problem, we propose a zero and one inflated item response theory modeling framework for bounded continuous responses in the closed interval. We illustrate how four existing models for bounded responses from the literature can be accommodated in the framework. The resulting zero and one inflated item response theory models are studied in a simulation study and a real data application to investigate parameter recovery, model fit, and the consequences of fitting the incorrect distribution to the data. We find that neglecting the bounded nature of the data biases parameters and that misspecification of the exact distribution may affect the results depending on the data generating model.

Suggested Citation

  • Dylan Molenaar & Mariana Cúri & Jorge L. Bazán, 2022. "Zero and One Inflated Item Response Theory Models for Bounded Continuous Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 47(6), pages 693-735, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:47:y:2022:i:6:p:693-735
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986221108455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986221108455
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986221108455?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raydonal Ospina & Silvia Ferrari, 2010. "Inflated beta distributions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 111-126, January.
    2. Yvonnick Noel, 2014. "A Beta Unfolding Model for Continuous Bounded Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 647-674, October.
    3. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    4. Conor Dolan & Han Maas, 1998. "Fitting multivariage normal finite mixtures subject to structural equation modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 227-253, September.
    5. Zhang, Peng & Qiu, Zhenguo & Shi, Chengchun, 2016. "simplexreg: An R Package for Regression Analysis of Proportional Data Using the Simplex Distribution," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 71(i11).
    6. Zhang, Peng & Qiu, Zhenguo & Shi, Chengchun, 2016. "simplexreg: an R package for regression analysis of proportional data using the simplex distribution," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102115, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Fumiko Samejima, 1973. "Homogeneous case of the continuous response model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(2), pages 203-219, June.
    8. Borus Jungbacker & Siem Jan Koopman & Michel Wel, 2014. "Smooth Dynamic Factor Analysis With Application To The Us Term Structure Of Interest Rates," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 65-90, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Youxiang Jiang & Qingrong Tan & Wei Wen & Daxun Wang & Yan Cai & Dongbo Tu, 2025. "A Family of Cognitive Diagnosis Models for Continuous Bounded Responses," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 50(3), pages 526-564, June.
    2. Cardenas Hurtado, Camilo & Moustaki, Irini & Chen, Yunxiao & Marra, Giampiero, 2025. "Generalized latent variable models for location, scale, and shape parameters," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127387, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dries P.J. Kuijper & Jakub W. Bubnicki & Marcin Churski & Bjorn Mols & Pim van Hooft, 2015. "Context dependence of risk effects: wolves and tree logs create patches of fear in an old-growth forest," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1558-1568.
    2. Cai, Jing-Heng & Song, Xin-Yuan & Lam, Kwok-Hap & Ip, Edward Hak-Sing, 2011. "A mixture of generalized latent variable models for mixed mode and heterogeneous data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 2889-2907, November.
    3. Maria Gheorghe & Susan Picavet & Monique Verschuren & Werner B. F. Brouwer & Pieter H. M. Baal, 2017. "Health losses at the end of life: a Bayesian mixed beta regression approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(3), pages 723-749, June.
    4. Kathryn M. Irvine & T. J. Rodhouse & Ilai N. Keren, 2016. "Extending Ordinal Regression with a Latent Zero-Augmented Beta Distribution," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 619-640, December.
    5. Dylan Molenaar & Paul Boeck, 2018. "Response Mixture Modeling: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Item Characteristics across Response Times," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(2), pages 279-297, June.
    6. Matthias Kloft & Raphael Hartmann & Andreas Voss & Daniel W. Heck, 2023. "The Dirichlet Dual Response Model: An Item Response Model for Continuous Bounded Interval Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 888-916, September.
    7. Patrícia L. Espinheira & Alisson Oliveira Silva, 2020. "Residual and influence analysis to a general class of simplex regression," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(2), pages 523-552, June.
    8. Li, Yun-Xian & Kano, Yutaka & Pan, Jun-Hao & Song, Xin-Yuan, 2012. "A criterion-based model comparison statistic for structural equation models with heterogeneous data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 92-107.
    9. Aknouche, Abdelhakim & Dimitrakopoulos, Stefanos, 2021. "Autoregressive conditional proportion: A multiplicative-error model for (0,1)-valued time series," MPRA Paper 110954, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 06 Dec 2021.
    10. Idika E. Okorie & Emmanuel Afuecheta, 2024. "An Alternative to the Beta Regression Model with Applications to OECD Employment and Cancer Data," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 887-908, June.
    11. Ishfaq S. Ahmad & Rameesa Jan & Poonam Nirwan & Peer Bilal Ahmad, 2024. "A New Class of Distribution Over Bounded Support and Its Associated Regression Model," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 549-569, April.
    12. Nathan D. Minchen & Jimmy de la Torre & Ying Liu, 2017. "A Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Continuous Response," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 42(6), pages 651-677, December.
    13. Abdelhakim Aknouche & Stefanos Dimitrakopoulos, 2023. "Autoregressive conditional proportion: A multiplicative‐error model for (0,1)‐valued time series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 393-417, July.
    14. Youxiang Jiang & Qingrong Tan & Wei Wen & Daxun Wang & Yan Cai & Dongbo Tu, 2025. "A Family of Cognitive Diagnosis Models for Continuous Bounded Responses," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 50(3), pages 526-564, June.
    15. Buddhavarapu, Prasad & Bansal, Prateek & Prozzi, Jorge A., 2021. "A new spatial count data model with time-varying parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 566-586.
    16. Mumtaz, Haroon & Theodoridis, Konstantinos, 2017. "Common and country specific economic uncertainty," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 205-216.
    17. Jesse Elliott & Zemin Bai & Shu-Ching Hsieh & Shannon E Kelly & Li Chen & Becky Skidmore & Said Yousef & Carine Zheng & David J Stewart & George A Wells, 2020. "ALK inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.
    19. Francois Olivier & Laval Guillaume, 2011. "Deviance Information Criteria for Model Selection in Approximate Bayesian Computation," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, July.
    20. Raggi, Davide & Bordignon, Silvano, 2012. "Long memory and nonlinearities in realized volatility: A Markov switching approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3730-3742.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:47:y:2022:i:6:p:693-735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.