IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v74y2021i4p875-897.html

A Tale of Two Forums: Employment Discrimination Outcomes in Arbitration and Litigation

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Gough

Abstract

This article presents data from a novel survey of 1,256 employment plaintiff attorneys to test whether employee rights and remedies are affected by mandatory employment arbitration. By surveying attorneys directly about their most recent employment discrimination cases taken to verdict in arbitration and civil litigation, the author presents a systematic empirical comparison of outcomes between civil courts and arbitration with robust controls. The ability to control for the legal basis of the claim, defendant size, use of summary judgment, and attorney and plaintiff characteristics significantly improves on previous empirical research studies. Consistent with previous research, employee win rates in arbitration are lower than those found in state and federal court. In addition, monetary award amounts and percentage of claim amount awarded to employees who prevail in their cases are significantly lower in arbitration compared to outcomes in state and federal jury trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Gough, 2021. "A Tale of Two Forums: Employment Discrimination Outcomes in Arbitration and Litigation," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(4), pages 875-897, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:74:y:2021:i:4:p:875-897
    DOI: 10.1177/0019793920915876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0019793920915876
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0019793920915876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theodore Eisenberg, 2015. "Four Decades of Federal Civil Rights Litigation," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 4-28, March.
    2. Jennifer K. Robbennolt, 2006. "Apologies and Settlement Levers," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 333-373, July.
    3. Laura Beth Nielsen & Robert L. Nelson & Ryon Lancaster, 2010. "Individual Justice or Collective Legal Mobilization? Employment Discrimination Litigation in the Post Civil Rights United States," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 175-201, June.
    4. Kevin M. Clermont & Stewart J. Schwab, 2004. "How Employment Discrimination Plaintiffs Fare in Federal Court," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 429-458, July.
    5. J. Ryan Lamare, 2020. "The Devil Is in the Details: Attorney Effects on Employment Arbitration Outcomes," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 73(2), pages 456-478, March.
    6. Mark Gough & Kyle Albert, 2019. "Who Supports Professional Certification? Insights from Employment Arbitration," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 57(4), pages 850-869, December.
    7. Mark D. Gough, 2018. "How Do Organizational Environments and Mandatory Arbitration Shape Employment Attorney Case Selection? Evidence from an Experimental Vignette," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 541-567, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark D. Gough & Alexander J. S. Colvin, 2020. "Decision-Maker and Context Effects in Employment Arbitration," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 73(2), pages 479-497, March.
    2. Alexander A. Reinert, 2023. "Asymmetric review of qualified immunity appeals," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 4-85, March.
    3. Mark D. Gough, 2018. "How Do Organizational Environments and Mandatory Arbitration Shape Employment Attorney Case Selection? Evidence from an Experimental Vignette," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 541-567, October.
    4. Judy FUDGE & Guy MUNDLAK, 2022. "Law and gendered labour market segmentation," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 161(4), pages 657-675, December.
    5. Chen, Daniel L. & Levonyan, Vardges & Yeh, Susan, 2016. "Policies Affect Preferences: Evidence from Random Variation in Abortion Jurisprudence," IAST Working Papers 16-58, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    6. Ivana Zilic & Helen LaVan, 2020. "Arbitration of accommodation in US workplaces: employee, stakeholder and human resources characteristics," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 454-473, September.
    7. Keren Weinshall‐Margel, 2011. "Attitudinal and Neo‐Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(3), pages 556-586, September.
    8. Jennifer K. Robbennolt & Jessica Bregant & Verity Winship, 2023. "Settlement schemas: How laypeople understand civil settlement," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), pages 488-533, September.
    9. Chen, Daniel L. & Yeh, Susan, 2022. "How do rights revolutions occur? Free speech and the first amendment," TSE Working Papers 22-1396, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    10. Friehe, Tim & Pham, Cat Lam, 2021. "Accident avoidance and settlement bargaining: The role of reciprocity," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Stephen J. Choi & Jill E. Fisch & A. C. Pritchard, 2010. "Attorneys as Arbitrators," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(1), pages 109-157, January.
    12. Jennifer Bennett Shinall, 2016. "What happens when the definition of disability changes? The case of obesity," IZA Journal of Labor Economics, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-30, December.
    13. Daryl Koehn & Maria Goranova, 2018. "Do Investors See Value in Ethically Sound CEO Apologies? Investigating Stock Market Reaction to CEO Apologies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 311-322, October.
    14. J. Ryan Lamare, 2020. "The Devil Is in the Details: Attorney Effects on Employment Arbitration Outcomes," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 73(2), pages 456-478, March.
    15. Chen, Daniel L. & Sethi, Jasmin, 2016. "Insiders, Outsiders, and Involuntary Unemployment: Sexual Harrassment Exacerbates Gender Inequality," IAST Working Papers 16-44, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    16. Shilin Zhang & Guilan Yu & Yong Qu & Lifang Chen, 2024. "Explaining Enterprise Litigation Success with fsQCA: The Role of Local Economic Environment, Policy Preferences, Case Complexity, and Party Capability," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    17. Laura Beth Nielsen & Amy Myrick & Jill Weinberg, 2011. "Siding with Science," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 40(4), pages 646-667, November.
    18. Ariel C. Avgar & Alexander J. S. Colvin & Harry C. Katz & Katrina G. Nobles, 2023. "A fragmented and heavily privatized dispute resolution system: The United States," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4-5), pages 304-320, July.
    19. Theodore Eisenberg & Thomas Eisenberg & Martin T. Wells & Min Zhang, 2015. "Addressing the Zeros Problem: Regression Models for Outcomes with a Large Proportion of Zeros, with an Application to Trial Outcomes," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 161-186, March.
    20. Benjamin Ho & Elaine Liu, 2011. "What's an Apology Worth? Decomposing the Effect of Apologies on Medical Malpractice Payments Using State Apology Laws," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(s1), pages 179-199, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:74:y:2021:i:4:p:875-897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.