IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v42y1989i4p566-583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mandatory-Permissive Distinction and Collective Bargaining Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • John Thomas Delaney
  • Donna Sockell

Abstract

The authors use union contract and laboratory experiment data to assess whether the distinction between mandatory and permissive bargaining subjects affects collective bargaining outcomes. In general, the findings suggest that the distinction has an impact. The contract analysis suggests that bargaining differs across contracts that include permissive items and contracts that exclude permissive items. Further, an analysis of the potential impact of the distinction in a controlled setting indicates that unions negotiate less favorable nonwage bargaining outcomes when an issue's legal status is permissive or unknown than when it is mandatory.

Suggested Citation

  • John Thomas Delaney & Donna Sockell, 1989. "The Mandatory-Permissive Distinction and Collective Bargaining Outcomes," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 42(4), pages 566-583, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:42:y:1989:i:4:p:566-583
    DOI: 10.1177/001979398904200407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001979398904200407
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/001979398904200407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas A. Kochan & Richard N. Block, 1977. "An Interindustry Analysis of Bargaining Outcomes: Preliminary Evidence from Two-Digit Industries," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 91(3), pages 431-452.
    2. Stephen A. Woodbury, "undated". "Pensions, The Scope of Bargaining and Bargaining Outcomes in the Public Schools," Upjohn Working Papers saw1985, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    3. Stephen A. Woodbury, 1985. "The Scope of Bargaining and Bargaining Outcomes in the Public Schools," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 38(2), pages 195-210, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katharine O. Strunk & Sean F. Reardon, 2010. "Measuring the Strength of Teachers' Unions," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(6), pages 629-670, December.
    2. Michael F. Lovenheim, 2009. "The Effect of Teachers' Unions on Education Production: Evidence from Union Election Certifications in Three Midwestern States," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 27(4), pages 525-587, October.
    3. Cowen, Joshua M. & Strunk, Katharine O., 2015. "The impact of teachers’ unions on educational outcomes: What we know and what we need to learn," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 208-223.
    4. Kuhn, Peter & Gu, Wulong, 1998. "Centralization and strikes," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 243-265, September.
    5. Richard B. Freeman & James L. Medoff, 1982. "The Impact of Collective Bargaining: Can the New Facts Be Explained by Monopoly Unionism?," NBER Working Papers 0837, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Schnell, John F., 1979. "Collective Bargaining and Market Structure in Bituminous Coal: Three Stages of Evolutionary Relations," Miscellaneous Series 257749, Pennsylvania State University.
    7. Richard B. Freeman & James L. Medoff, 1981. "The Impact of Collective Bargaining: Illusion or Reality?," NBER Working Papers 0735, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Kochan, Thomas A. & Helfman, David E., 1981. "The effects of collective bargaining on economic and behavioral job outcomes," Working papers 1181-81., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:42:y:1989:i:4:p:566-583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.