IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v23y2022i6p1492-1519.html

Assessment of Social Accountability through SDGs of Corporate Sector during COVID-19 in India

Author

Listed:
  • Resham Goyal
  • Ramesh Chandra Dangwal

Abstract

The major focus in the field of sustainability assessment for the past few years is on analysing the sustainability practices of corporates on an annual basis. Less attention has been devoted to estimating the sustainability practices on an event basis. The current study was carried out to analyse the sustainability practices adopted by companies during the period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). A sustainability performance measurement (SPM) framework was constructed using content analysis, to measure the performance of Sensex companies towards sustainability efforts. Sensex constitutes 30 well-established and financially sound companies listed in the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). The primary elements of the SPM framework were derived from Sustainable Development Goals, which are considered to be a blueprint for a sustainable future. The initiatives taken by companies during the period of ‘covidization’ were classified under different parameters of SPM and then quantified with the help of mathematical tools. The results signify that there lies a scope of 63.08% improvement in sustainability practices of overall industries. Further, there is a huge gap of 76.92% between the best-performing and least-performing companies. The performance of all the sectors studied for the sustainability practices was statistically at par with each other. However, the difference between the best-performing (fast-moving consumer goods—FMCG) and least performing (finance) sectors was found to be 42.74%. The result of analysis of variance (ANOVA) for performance across various sustainability parameters taken up by different sectors was significantly different from each other. A gap of 86.67% was uncovered in our analysis between the best-performing and least-performing sustainability parameters taken up by the companies under various sectors. Considering the fact that COVID-19 is a medical emergency, the performance of ‘good health and well-being’ as the best-performing sustainability parameter is justified. But at the same time, importance of other sustainability parameters cannot be ignored. It has also been observed that even in times of dire necessity, the prevailing undersized image of sustainability efforts of selected sample companies was not satisfactory. It is suggested that the corporate sector and the government should be more cautious in pursuing the objective of sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Resham Goyal & Ramesh Chandra Dangwal, 2022. "Assessment of Social Accountability through SDGs of Corporate Sector during COVID-19 in India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(6), pages 1492-1519, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:23:y:2022:i:6:p:1492-1519
    DOI: 10.1177/09721509221123126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09721509221123126
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09721509221123126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koen Deconinck & Ellie Avery & Lee Ann Jackson, 2020. "Food Supply Chains and Covid‐19: Impacts and Policy Lessons," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(3), pages 34-39, December.
    2. Riccardo Torelli & Federica Balluchi & Katia Furlotti, 2020. "The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 470-484, March.
    3. Robert G. Eccles & Michael P. Krzus & Jean Rogers & George Serafeim, 2012. "The Need for Sector-Specific Materiality and Sustainability Reporting Standards," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 24(2), pages 65-71, June.
    4. Mahesh Vyas, 2020. "Impact of Lockdown on Labour in India," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 63(1), pages 73-77, October.
    5. Cory Searcy, 2012. "Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Systems: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 239-253, May.
    6. Preeti Sharma & Priyanka Panday & R. C. Dangwal, 2020. "Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: a study of Indian companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 208-217, December.
    7. Kundu, Bhargabi & Bhowmik, Dipak, 2020. "Societal impact of novel corona virus (COVID ̶ 19 pandemic) in India," SocArXiv vm5rz, Center for Open Science.
    8. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    9. repec:osf:socarx:vm5rz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Appel Mahmud & Donghong Ding & Md. Morshadul Hasan, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    11. Ashis Kumar Pradhan & Barsha Nibedita, 2021. "The Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Indian Firms," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(3), pages 753-766, June.
    12. Milind Kumar Jha & K. Rangarajan, 2020. "The approach of Indian corporates towards sustainable development: An exploration using sustainable development goals based model," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1019-1032, September.
    13. Oldekop, Johan A. & Horner, Rory & Hulme, David & Adhikari, Roshan & Agarwal, Bina & Alford, Matthew & Bakewell, Oliver & Banks, Nicola & Barrientos, Stephanie & Bastia, Tanja & Bebbington, Anthony J., 2020. "COVID-19 and the case for global development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Najul Laskar & Santi Gopal Maji, 2016. "Corporate sustainability reporting practices in India: myth or reality?," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 625-641, October.
    15. Refandi Budi Deswanto & Sylvia Veronica Siregar, 2018. "The associations between environmental disclosures with financial performance, environmental performance, and firm value," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(1), pages 180-193, March.
    16. Najul Laskar & Santi Gopal Maji, 2016. "Corporate sustainability reporting practices in India: myth or reality?," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 625-641, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marika Arena & Giovanni Azzone & Sara Ratti & Valeria Maria Urbano & Giovanni Vecchio, 2023. "Sustainable development goals and corporate reporting: An empirical investigation of the oil and gas industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 12-25, February.
    2. Karishma Jain & P. S. Tripathi, 2022. "Challenges of Sustainability Reporting from Managerial Perspective: A Review and Future Agenda," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 21(2), pages 140-151, December.
    3. Varsha Sehgal & Naval Garg & Jagvinder Singh, 2023. "Impact of sustainability performance & reporting on a firm’s reputation," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 228-240, February.
    4. Varsha Sehgal & Naval Garg & Jagvinder Singh, 2022. "Impact of Environmental and Social Reporting and Performance on Financial Performance of a Firm: An Indian Study," Paradigm, , vol. 26(2), pages 99-118, December.
    5. Nozimakhon Kodirjonova & Jong Dae Kim, 2023. "Examining the Link between CSRD and FP in Korean Companies: The Moderating Effect of Company Reputation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-11, April.
    6. Ritika Gupta & Pankaj Kumar, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility disclosure: a study on NIFTY 100 companies," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 27(4), pages 492-515.
    7. Varsha Sehgal & Naval Garg & Jagvinder Singh, 2023. "Impact of sustainability reporting and performance on organization legitimacy," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 143-153, March.
    8. Milind Kumar Jha & K. Rangarajan, 2020. "Analysis of corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance causal linkage in the Indian context," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-30, December.
    9. Milind Kumar Jha & K. Rangarajan, 2020. "The approach of Indian corporates towards sustainable development: An exploration using sustainable development goals based model," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1019-1032, September.
    10. Farhan Hussain & Zhifang Zhou & Hussain Abbas & Didier Robert Dusengemungu, 2025. "The Impact of Sustainability Disclosure on Firm Value in the Energy Sector of BRICS Economies: The Holistic Approach of GRI Guidelines," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 4960-4975, August.
    11. T. G. Saji & T. A. Akshaykumar, 2025. "The Value Relevance of Sustainability Reporting Practices: A Bibliometric and Qualitative Synthesis of Scientific Literature in the Post‐GFC Era," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 4769-4787, July.
    12. Nuria Padilla‐Garrido & Francisco Aguado‐Correa & Inmaculada Rabadán‐Martín & José María López‐Jiménez & Juan José de la Vega‐Jiménez & Ignacio Peletier‐Ribera, 2024. "Materiality analysis in sustainability reporting: Insights from large Spanish companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5391-5412, November.
    13. Bianca Alves Almeida Machado & Lívia Cristina Pinto Dias & Alberto Fonseca, 2021. "Transparency of materiality analysis in GRI‐based sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 570-580, March.
    14. Regmi, Rupesh & Zhang, Zhuo & Zhang, Hongpeng, 2023. "Entrepreneurship strategy, natural resources management and sustainable performance: A study of an emerging market," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    15. Amitava Mondal & Somnath Bauri, 2025. "Climate-related financial disclosures and firm value: evidence from India," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(5), pages 1-24, May.
    16. Siyu Shen & Jun Xie & Hidemichi Fujii & Alexander Ryota Keeley & Shunsuke Managi, 2025. "Does environmental materiality matter to corporate financial performance: Evidence from 34 countries," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 2390-2411, March.
    17. Victoria Bogdan & Luminita Rus & Dana Simona Gherai & Adrian Gheorghe Florea & Nicoleta Georgeta Bugnar, 2023. "A Streamline Sustainable Business Performance Reporting Model by an Integrated FinESG Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Thomas A. Tsalis & Maria Terzaki & Dimitrios Koulouriotis & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2023. "The nexus of United Nations' 2030 Agenda and corporate sustainability reports," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 784-796, April.
    19. Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Zhao, Yongan & Chen, Dengsheng, 2025. "Emissions trading scheme's effect on enterprises' sustainable development in China: A differential game and a quasi-natural experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Ying Lu & Tingting Liu & Junrui Zhang & Hussain Muhammad Jameel, 2025. "When Confidence Backfires: The Impact of Managerial Overconfidence on Environmental Information Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-24, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:23:y:2022:i:6:p:1492-1519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.