IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v48y2024i5p797-847.html

‘Led by Intelligence': A Scoping Review on the Experimental Evaluation of Intelligence-Led Policing

Author

Listed:
  • Robin Khalfa
  • Wim Hardyns

Abstract

Intelligence-led policing (ILP) was introduced in the 1990s as a proactive approach to policing, but to date, there is a lack of studies that have synthesized and summarized the central characteristics and insights of (quasi-)experimental studies related to ILP. This study aims to address this gap by synthesizing and characterizing the central characteristics of 38 quasi-experimental and experimental studies related to ILP. In this study, a scoping review is conducted on different quasi-experimental and experimental studies that relate to the framework of ILP. It was found that most studies within the domain of ILP focus on testing the crime reduction effects of using spatio-temporal crime intelligence to deploy police resources more efficiently and effectively. However, some studies have combined different types of crime intelligence or used solely offender-related intelligence. Several statistical-methodological challenges were also identified that should be considered when designing experimental research within the domain of ILP. Additionally, most studies focused solely on measuring crime reduction, with few focusing on secondary effects of interventions. The review concludes that future evaluation studies should consider evaluating the use of different types of crime intelligence and establish specific, objective, and realistic criteria for measuring specific performance measures such as crime disruption. Future experimental research within the domain of ILP should consider applying the 3-i model, evaluating each leg of ILP thoroughly. The limitations of the study are also discussed. This review provides valuable insights for future research and development of ILP-related approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin Khalfa & Wim Hardyns, 2024. "‘Led by Intelligence': A Scoping Review on the Experimental Evaluation of Intelligence-Led Policing," Evaluation Review, , vol. 48(5), pages 797-847, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:48:y:2024:i:5:p:797-847
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X231204588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X231204588
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X231204588?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sobel, Michael E., 2006. "What Do Randomized Studies of Housing Mobility Demonstrate?: Causal Inference in the Face of Interference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1398-1407, December.
    2. Carter, Jeremy G. & Phillips, Scott W. & Gayadeen, S. Marlon, 2014. "Implementing Intelligence-Led Policing: An Application of Loose-Coupling Theory," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 433-442.
    3. Giovanni Mastrobuoni, 2020. "Crime is Terribly Revealing: Information Technology and Police Productivity," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 87(6), pages 2727-2753.
    4. Kimberly S. Przeszlowski & Vaughn J. Crichlow, 2018. "An Exploratory Assessment of Community-Oriented Policing Implementation, Social Disorganization and Crime in America," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Paul M. Collier, 2006. "Policing and the Intelligent Application of Knowledge," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 109-116, April.
    6. Anthony Braga & Andrew Papachristos & David Hureau, 2012. "Hot spots policing effects on crime," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 1-96.
    7. repec:bla:pmomgt:v:26:y:2006:i:2:p:109-116 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. G. O. Mohler & M. B. Short & Sean Malinowski & Mark Johnson & G. E. Tita & Andrea L. Bertozzi & P. J. Brantingham, 2015. "Randomized Controlled Field Trials of Predictive Policing," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1399-1411, December.
    9. Carter, Jeremy G. & Mohler, George & Raje, Rajeev & Chowdhury, Nahida & Pandey, Saurabh, 2021. "The Indianapolis harmspot policing experiment," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Andrei O. J. Kwok & Motoki Watabe & Pervaiz K. Ahmed, 2021. "Designing a Laboratory-Based Behavioral Experiment," Springer Books, in: Augmenting Employee Trust and Cooperation, chapter 0, pages 43-53, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perez, Yuri & Gonçalves, Luis Fernando & Pereira, Fabio Henrique, 2025. "An urban network percolation based spatiotemporal analysis of crime hotspot using directed acyclic graphs," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 669(C).
    2. Vitezslav Titl & Deni Mazrekaj & Fritz Schiltz, 2024. "Identifying Politically Connected Firms: A Machine Learning Approach," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 86(1), pages 137-155, February.
    3. Guido de Blasio & Alessio D'Ignazio & Marco Letta, 2020. "Predicting Corruption Crimes with Machine Learning. A Study for the Italian Municipalities," Working Papers 16/20, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    4. Tiziano Arduini & Eleonora Patacchini & Edoardo Rainone, 2020. "Treatment Effects With Heterogeneous Externalities," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 826-838, October.
    5. Gottschalk, Petter & Filstad, Cathrine & Glomseth, Rune & Solli-Sæther, Hans, 2011. "Information management for investigation and prevention of white-collar crime," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 226-233.
    6. Chen, Xilu & Ge, Erqi & Xu, Xianxiang & Zhou, Quan, 2025. "Does digitalization of government activities improve business environment? The influence of public service standardization," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 533-560.
    7. Giovanni Cerulli, 2014. "ntreatreg: a Stata module for estimation of treatment effects in the presence of neighborhood interactions," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2014 15, Stata Users Group.
    8. Victoria A. Sytsma, 2024. "Vulnerable Populations, Crime, and a Social Justice and Social Impact Agenda: Lessons for Crime Prevention," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 714(1), pages 40-55, July.
    9. d'Este, Rocco, 2022. "Scientific Advancements in Illegal Drugs Production and Institutional Responses: New Psychoactive Substances, Self-Harm, and Violence inside Prisons," IZA Discussion Papers 15248, IZA Network @ LISER.
    10. Sue-Ming Yang & I-Chin Jen, 2018. "An Evaluation of Displacement and Diffusion Effects on Eco-Terrorist Activities After Police Interventions," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1103-1123, December.
    11. A. Giffin & B. J. Reich & S. Yang & A. G. Rappold, 2023. "Generalized propensity score approach to causal inference with spatial interference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2220-2231, September.
    12. Graham, Bryan S. & Imbens, Guido W. & Ridder, Geert, 2025. "Measuring the effects of segregation in the presence of social spillovers: A nonparametric approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 252(PB).
    13. Ludwig, Jens & Duncan, Greg J. & Katz, Lawrence F. & Kessler, Ronald & Kling, Jeffrey R. & Gennetian, Lisa A. & Sanbonmatsu, Lisa, 2012. "Neighborhood Effects on the Long-Term Well-Being of Low-Income Adults," Scholarly Articles 11870359, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    14. Marynia Kolak & Luc Anselin, 2020. "A Spatial Perspective on the Econometrics of Program Evaluation," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 43(1-2), pages 128-153, January.
    15. repec:osf:socarx:eqtzp_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Chiba, Yasutaka, 2012. "A note on bounds for the causal infectiousness effect in vaccine trials," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(7), pages 1422-1429.
    17. Valasik, Matthew, 2018. "Gang violence predictability: Using risk terrain modeling to study gang homicides and gang assaults in East Los Angeles," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 10-21.
    18. Máté Kormos & Robert P. Lieli & Martin Huber, 2025. "Interacting Treatments With Endogenous Takeup," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 424-437, June.
    19. Sourafel Girma & Yundan Gong & Holger Görg & Sandra Lancheros, 2016. "Estimating direct and indirect effects of foreign direct investment on firm productivity in the presence of interactions between firms," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES AND HOST COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT, chapter 12, pages 227-239, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    20. Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness & Ahmed A. Ewees & Hong Fan & Mohamed Abd Elaziz, 2020. "Optimized Forecasting Method for Weekly Influenza Confirmed Cases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    21. Lopez-Rivas, Jose D., 2024. "Spreading the word! Effects of a randomized normative informational campaign on residential water conservation," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:48:y:2024:i:5:p:797-847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.