IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v23y1999i4p399-417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding and Controlling Response Bias in Needs Assessment Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J. Calsyn

    (University of Missouri–St. Louis)

  • Joel P. Winter

    (University of Missouri–St. Louis)

Abstract

This study demonstrated that estimates of agency awareness in the typical needs assessment study are probably inflated by a response bias labeled “agency awareness overclaiming.†Overclaimers (respondents who reported being aware of fictitious agencies) reported being aware of more real agencies than other respondents. Estimates of agency awareness may also be biased, because certain segments of the population were more likely to exhibit agency awareness overclaiming. Age was positively correlated with overclaiming, and African Americans were more likely to exhibit agency awareness overclaiming than Caucasians. General overclaiming was correlated with agency awareness overclaiming, but social desirability and acquiescence were not.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J. Calsyn & Joel P. Winter, 1999. "Understanding and Controlling Response Bias in Needs Assessment Studies," Evaluation Review, , vol. 23(4), pages 399-417, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:23:y:1999:i:4:p:399-417
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9902300403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9902300403
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9902300403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torbjørn Moum, 1988. "Yea-saying and mood-of-the-day effects in self-reported quality of life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 117-139, April.
    2. Calsyn, Robert J., 1995. "Predicting agency awareness acquiescence in physicians," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 343-347.
    3. Goldsmith, Ronald E., 1988. "Spurious response error in a new product survey," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 271-281, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert J. Calsyn & William L. Kelemen & E. Terrence Jones & Joel P. Winter, 2001. "Reducing Overclaiming in Needs Assessment Studies an Experimental Comparison," Evaluation Review, , vol. 25(6), pages 583-604, December.
    2. J.J. Ehrhardt & W.E. Saris & R. Veenhoven, 2000. "Stability of Life-satisfaction over Time," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 177-205, June.
    3. Ali Ardeshiri & Joffre Swait & Elizabeth C. Heagney & Mladen Kovac, 2019. "Preserve or retreat? Willingness-to-pay for Coastline Protection in New South Wales," Papers 1902.03310, arXiv.org.
    4. Dolnicar, Sara & Grün, Bettina & Leisch, Friedrich, 2016. "Increasing sample size compensates for data problems in segmentation studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 992-999.
    5. Ardeshiri, Ali & Rashidi, Taha Hossein, 2020. "Willingness to pay for fast charging station for electric vehicles with limited market penetration making," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    6. Raymond Y. T. Yeung & Richard D. Smith & Lai‐Ming Ho & Janice M. Johnston & Gabriel M. Leung, 2006. "Empirical implications of response acquiescence in discrete‐choice contingent valuation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(10), pages 1077-1089, October.
    7. Robert J. Calsyn & W. Dean Klinkenberg, 1995. "Response Bias in Needs Assessment Studies," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(2), pages 217-225, April.
    8. Bae, Jeong Hwan & Rishi, Meenakshi & Li, Dmitriy, 2021. "Consumer preferences for a green certificate program in South Korea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:23:y:1999:i:4:p:399-417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.