IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v11y1984i3p339-348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Methods for Exploring Ill-Defined Problems

Author

Listed:
  • L D Hopkins

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA)

Abstract

Methods for exploring ill-defined problems are now being developed. Claims for these methods are frequently based on analogies with optimization processes. More persuasive backing for these claims can be obtained by conducting experiments that consider both the analyst or decisionmaker and the method. The most fruitful experimental design is for each subject to apply one method to one problem. Solution quality is then assessed by external judges, using the solutions from all the subjects as a source of knowledge about the ill-defined problem.

Suggested Citation

  • L D Hopkins, 1984. "Evaluation of Methods for Exploring Ill-Defined Problems," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 11(3), pages 339-348, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:11:y:1984:i:3:p:339-348
    DOI: 10.1068/b110339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b110339
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b110339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jyrki Wallenius, 1975. "Comparative Evaluation of Some Interactive Approaches to Multicriterion Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(12), pages 1387-1396, August.
    2. Thomas W. Trybus & Lewis D. Hopkins, 1980. "Humans vs. Computer Algorithms for the Plant Layout Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 570-574, June.
    3. E. Downey Brill, Jr. & Shoou-Yuh Chang & Lewis D. Hopkins, 1982. "Modeling to Generate Alternatives: The HSJ Approach and an Illustration Using a Problem in Land Use Planning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 221-235, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tunjo Perić & Zoran Babić & Josip Matejaš, 2018. "Comparative analysis of application efficiency of two iterative multi objective linear programming methods (MP method and STEM method)," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(3), pages 565-583, September.
    2. Tim T. Pedersen & Mikael Skou Andersen & Marta Victoria & Gorm B. Andresen, 2021. "30.000 ways to reach 55% decarbonization of the European electricity sector," Papers 2112.07247, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    3. Lakshminarayan, P. G., 1993. "Tradeoffs in balancing multiple objectives of an integrated agricultural economic and environmental system," ISU General Staff Papers 1993010108000011833, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2020. "Urban land use and transportation planning for climate change mitigation: A theoretical framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 604-616.
    5. Jan-Philipp Sasse & Evelina Trutnevyte, 2023. "A low-carbon electricity sector in Europe risks sustaining regional inequalities in benefits and vulnerabilities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Sasse, Jan-Philipp & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2023. "Cost-effective options and regional interdependencies of reaching a low-carbon European electricity system in 2035," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    7. S R Kshirsagar & E D Brill Jr, 1984. "Ideation and Evaluation Methods Applied to Land-Use Planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 11(3), pages 313-324, September.
    8. Kalu, Timothy Ch. U., 1999. "An algorithm for systems welfare interactive goal programming modelling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(3), pages 508-529, August.
    9. Aloysius, John A. & Davis, Fred D. & Wilson, Darryl D. & Ross Taylor, A. & Kottemann, Jeffrey E., 2006. "User acceptance of multi-criteria decision support systems: The impact of preference elicitation techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 273-285, February.
    10. S-Y Chang & S-L Liaw, 1984. "Evaluation of Methods for Generating Alternatives to Regional Wastewater Treatment Systems," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 11(3), pages 325-337, September.
    11. Chen, Thomas Ying-Jeh & Guikema, Seth David & Daly, Craig Michael, 2019. "Optimal pipe inspection paths considering inspection tool limitations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 156-166.
    12. Makowski, David & Hendrix, Eligius M. T. & van Ittersum, Martin K. & Rossing, Walter A. H., 2001. "Generation and presentation of nearly optimal solutions for mixed-integer linear programming, applied to a case in farming system design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 425-438, July.
    13. M A Ridgley & T W Giambelluca, 1992. "Linking Water-Balance Simulation and Multiobjective Programming: Land-Use Plan Design in Hawaii," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 19(3), pages 317-336, June.
    14. B Rubenstein-Montano & I Zandi, 1999. "Application of a Genetic Algorithm to Policy Planning: The Case of Solid Waste," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 26(6), pages 893-907, December.
    15. Xingdong Zhang & Marc P Armstrong, 2008. "Genetic Algorithms and the Corridor Location Problem: Multiple Objectives and Alternative Solutions," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(1), pages 148-168, February.
    16. Joseph F. DeCarolis & Samaneh Babaee & Binghui Li & Suyash Kanungo, 2019. "Energy Scenario Exploration with Modeling to Generate Alternatives (MGA)," Papers 1912.03788, arXiv.org.
    17. Silva, Felipe L.C. & Souza, Reinaldo C. & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando L. & Lourenco, Plutarcho M. & Calili, Rodrigo F., 2018. "A bottom-up methodology for long term electricity consumption forecasting of an industrial sector - Application to pulp and paper sector in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1107-1118.
    18. Zhou, Wenchao & Gong, Peichen, 2004. "Economic effects of environmental concerns in forest management: an analysis of the cost of achieving environmental goals," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 97-113, September.
    19. Price, James & Keppo, Ilkka, 2017. "Modelling to generate alternatives: A technique to explore uncertainty in energy-environment-economy models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 356-369.
    20. D'Souza, Gerard E. & Smith, Dennis K. & Romero, Rafael F., 1988. "An Economic Analysis Of Alternative Beef-Cattle Grazing Systems," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270324, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:11:y:1984:i:3:p:339-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.