IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v55y2023i3p544-561.html

‘Commodification of everything’ arguments in the social sciences: Variants, specification, evaluation, critique

Author

Listed:
  • Derek Hall

Abstract

Claims about ‘the commodification of everything’ are a staple of 21st century left (and some liberal) analysis and critique. These claims, however, are asserted much more often than they are backed up, and little attention has been devoted to thinking through how they might be substantiated or to what ‘the commodification of everything’ actually means. This paper contributes to contemporary debates over capitalism, commodification and politics by suggesting ways that commodification-of-everything arguments can be better specified and evaluated. It identifies four variants of commodification-of-everything claims; reviews and critiques the literature's uses of the terms ‘commodity’, ‘everything’ and ‘thing’; and articulates three possible definitions of ‘the commodification of everything’ that raise additional questions about defining ‘sale’ and ‘market’ and the implications of thinking of things as commodities. The conclusion suggests reframings of the relationship between capitalism and commodification that seek to preserve the force of commodification-of-everything claims while avoiding their pitfalls.

Suggested Citation

  • Derek Hall, 2023. "‘Commodification of everything’ arguments in the social sciences: Variants, specification, evaluation, critique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(3), pages 544-561, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:55:y:2023:i:3:p:544-561
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X221128305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X221128305
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X221128305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. , Nurhayati, 2022. "Makalah "Marketing MIX"," OSF Preprints fg5tm, Center for Open Science.
    2. Goodwin, Geoff, 2018. "Rethinking the double movement: expanding the frontiers of Polanyian analysis in the Global South," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87253, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Eddie C. M. Hui & Ka Kwan Kevin Chan, 2022. "How does Covid-19 affect global equity markets?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Christensen, Jens H.E. & Gillan, James M., 2022. "Does quantitative easing affect market liquidity?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    5. Li, Yan & Liang, Chao & L.D. Huynh, Toan, 2022. "A new momentum measurement in the Chinese stock market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. , Arys, 2022. "The Concept Of Investment In The Capital Market," OSF Preprints 4bmp9, Center for Open Science.
    7. Martin, Ian W.R. & Nagel, Stefan, 2022. "Market efficiency in the age of big data," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 154-177.
    8. , Abdurohim, 2022. "Investing In Sharia Capital Market In Indonesia," OSF Preprints g3uja, Center for Open Science.
    9. Smessaert, Jacob & Missemer, Antoine & Levrel, Harold, 2020. "The commodification of nature, a review in social sciences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    10. Xingtang Wang & Leonard F. S. Wang, 2022. "Corporate cannibalism in an oligopolistic market," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 18(3), pages 402-417, September.
    11. Shi, Ruoding & Isengildina Massa, Olga, 2022. "Costs of Futures Hedging in Corn and Soybean Markets," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(2), May.
    12. Azzam, Azzeddine & Dhoubhadel, Sunil, 2022. "COVID-19, Beef Price Spreads, and Market Power," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(2), May.
    13. Smessaert, Jacob & Missemer, Antoine & Levrel, Harold, 2020. "The commodification of nature, a review in social sciences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    14. Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing, 2015. "The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10581, December.
    15. Geoff Goodwin, 2018. "Rethinking the Double Movement: Expanding the Frontiers of Polanyian Analysis in the Global South," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(5), pages 1268-1290, September.
    16. , Nurhamna, 2022. "Marketing Max," OSF Preprints kde4z, Center for Open Science.
    17. Kathryn A. A. O. Assefuah & Nthabiseng Moleko & Joshua Yindenaba Abor, 2022. "Pension Markets in Africa," Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions, in: Joshua Yindenaba Abor & Charles Komla Delali Adjasi (ed.), The Economics of Banking and Finance in Africa, chapter 0, pages 861-894, Palgrave Macmillan.
    18. Oecd, 2022. "Competition in Energy Markets," OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers 290, OECD Publishing.
    19. Shruthi B. C. & N. Suresh, 2022. "Indian Derivatives Market Evolution and Challenge," Papers 2207.13123, arXiv.org.
    20. Abhinava Tripathi & Alok Dixit & Vipul, 2022. "Liquidity commonality in the cryptocurrency market," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(15), pages 1727-1741, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Derek Hall, 2024. "Does capitalism drive towards the commodification of everything?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(7), pages 1916-1935, October.
    2. Benjamin Baumgartner & Hans Volmary, 2025. "Exploring decommodification strategies: A Polanyian perspective on a collaborative housing initiative in Vienna," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(5), pages 553-569, August.
    3. Colin Filer & Sango Mahanty & Lesley Potter, 2020. "The FPIC Principle Meets Land Struggles in Cambodia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Daniel Tjarks, 2026. "Great urban transformations. Exploring ‘offensive countermovements’ in Polanyi’s instituted economy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 44(1), pages 68-85, February.
    5. Fehrle, Johannes, 2025. "“Non-extractivist” extractivism:The valorization process of voluntary soil carbon schemes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    6. Geoff Goodwin, 2022. "Double Movements and Disembedded Economies: A Response to Richard Sandbrook," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(3), pages 676-702, May.
    7. Ackerschott, Adriana & Kohlhase, Esther & Vollmer, Anita & Hörisch, Jacob & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2023. "Steering of land use in the context of sustainable development: A systematic review of economic instruments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Leah S Horowitz, 2023. "The double movement and the triple-helix: Divestment, decommodification, and the Dakota Access Pipeline," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(6), pages 1337-1354, September.
    9. Goodwin, Geoff, 2021. "Fictitious commodification and agrarian change: indigenous peoples and land markets in Highland Ecuador," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108860, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Luxton, Sarah & Smith, Greg & Williams, Kristen & Ferrier, Simon & Bond, Anthelia & Prober, Suzanne, 2023. "An introduction to financial opportunities, ecological concepts, and risks underpinning aspirations for a nature-positive economy," OSF Preprints cu8rj, Center for Open Science.
    11. Garrett, R.D. & Grabs, J. & Cammelli, F. & Gollnow, F. & Levy, S.A., 2022. "Should payments for environmental services be used to implement zero-deforestation supply chain policies? The case of soy in the Brazilian Cerrado," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Fassina, Caroline & Jarvis, Diane & Tavares, Silvia & Coggan, Anthea, 2022. "Valuation of ecosystem services through offsets: Why are coastal ecosystems more valuable in Australia than in Brazil?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    13. Hannah Stokes-Ramos, 2023. "Rethinking Polanyi's double movement through participatory justice: Land use planning in Puerto Rico," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(8), pages 1970-1988, November.
    14. Christian Berndt & Marion Werner & Víctor Ramiro Fernández, 2020. "Postneoliberalism as institutional recalibration: Reading Polanyi through Argentina’s soy boom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 216-236, February.
    15. Quintin Bradley, 2022. "The accountancy of marketisation: Fictional markets in housing land supply," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(3), pages 493-507, May.
    16. Geoff Goodwin, 2024. "Uneven decommodification geographies: Exploring variation across the centre and periphery," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(3), pages 883-904, May.
    17. David Mosse & Sundara Babu Nagappan, 2021. "NGOs as Social Movements: Policy Narratives, Networks and the Performance of Dalit Rights in South India," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(1), pages 134-167, January.
    18. Richard Sandbrook, 2022. "Polanyi's Double Movement and Capitalism Today," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(3), pages 647-675, May.
    19. Philippe Quirion, 2021. "Tradable instruments to fight climate change: A disappointing outcome," Post-Print hal-03495904, HAL.
    20. Hupfel, Simon & Missemer, Antoine, 2023. "Decommodifying wealth: Lauderdale and ecological economics beyond the Lauderdale paradox," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:55:y:2023:i:3:p:544-561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.