IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v55y2023i3p544-561.html

‘Commodification of everything’ arguments in the social sciences: Variants, specification, evaluation, critique

Author

Listed:
  • Derek Hall

Abstract

Claims about ‘the commodification of everything’ are a staple of 21st century left (and some liberal) analysis and critique. These claims, however, are asserted much more often than they are backed up, and little attention has been devoted to thinking through how they might be substantiated or to what ‘the commodification of everything’ actually means. This paper contributes to contemporary debates over capitalism, commodification and politics by suggesting ways that commodification-of-everything arguments can be better specified and evaluated. It identifies four variants of commodification-of-everything claims; reviews and critiques the literature's uses of the terms ‘commodity’, ‘everything’ and ‘thing’; and articulates three possible definitions of ‘the commodification of everything’ that raise additional questions about defining ‘sale’ and ‘market’ and the implications of thinking of things as commodities. The conclusion suggests reframings of the relationship between capitalism and commodification that seek to preserve the force of commodification-of-everything claims while avoiding their pitfalls.

Suggested Citation

  • Derek Hall, 2023. "‘Commodification of everything’ arguments in the social sciences: Variants, specification, evaluation, critique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(3), pages 544-561, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:55:y:2023:i:3:p:544-561
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X221128305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X221128305
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X221128305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goodwin, Geoff, 2018. "Rethinking the double movement: expanding the frontiers of Polanyian analysis in the Global South," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87253, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Smessaert, Jacob & Missemer, Antoine & Levrel, Harold, 2020. "The commodification of nature, a review in social sciences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing, 2015. "The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10581, December.
    4. Geoff Goodwin, 2018. "Rethinking the Double Movement: Expanding the Frontiers of Polanyian Analysis in the Global South," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(5), pages 1268-1290, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Derek Hall, 2024. "Does capitalism drive towards the commodification of everything?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(7), pages 1916-1935, October.
    2. Benjamin Baumgartner & Hans Volmary, 2025. "Exploring decommodification strategies: A Polanyian perspective on a collaborative housing initiative in Vienna," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(5), pages 553-569, August.
    3. Colin Filer & Sango Mahanty & Lesley Potter, 2020. "The FPIC Principle Meets Land Struggles in Cambodia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Daniel Tjarks, 2026. "Great urban transformations. Exploring ‘offensive countermovements’ in Polanyi’s instituted economy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 44(1), pages 68-85, February.
    5. Geoff Goodwin, 2022. "Double Movements and Disembedded Economies: A Response to Richard Sandbrook," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(3), pages 676-702, May.
    6. Leah S Horowitz, 2023. "The double movement and the triple-helix: Divestment, decommodification, and the Dakota Access Pipeline," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(6), pages 1337-1354, September.
    7. Goodwin, Geoff, 2021. "Fictitious commodification and agrarian change: indigenous peoples and land markets in Highland Ecuador," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108860, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Hannah Stokes-Ramos, 2023. "Rethinking Polanyi's double movement through participatory justice: Land use planning in Puerto Rico," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(8), pages 1970-1988, November.
    9. Christian Berndt & Marion Werner & Víctor Ramiro Fernández, 2020. "Postneoliberalism as institutional recalibration: Reading Polanyi through Argentina’s soy boom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 216-236, February.
    10. Quintin Bradley, 2022. "The accountancy of marketisation: Fictional markets in housing land supply," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(3), pages 493-507, May.
    11. Geoff Goodwin, 2024. "Uneven decommodification geographies: Exploring variation across the centre and periphery," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(3), pages 883-904, May.
    12. David Mosse & Sundara Babu Nagappan, 2021. "NGOs as Social Movements: Policy Narratives, Networks and the Performance of Dalit Rights in South India," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(1), pages 134-167, January.
    13. Richard Sandbrook, 2022. "Polanyi's Double Movement and Capitalism Today," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(3), pages 647-675, May.
    14. Jan van Duppen, 2021. "Book review: The Botanical City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1746-1750, June.
    15. Eriksson, Axel, 2025. "A critical note on binaries in tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    16. Marguerite van den Berg, 2025. "Welfare ruination, debris and Europeans’ make-shift practices: A research agenda," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(1), pages 77-92, February.
    17. Katherine Farley, 2022. "“We ain't never stolen a plant”: Livelihoods, property, and illegal ginseng harvesting in the Appalachian forest commons," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 309-321, June.
    18. Jacqueline Fendt, 2025. "Writing Inquiry in a Post-Truth World: An Essay in Voice, Method, and Meaning," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, June.
    19. Dominic Piacentini, 2021. "Beside the berm: The convenience of roadside picking," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 208-218, June.
    20. Letizia Bindi & Angelo Belliggiano, 2023. "A Highly Condensed Social Fact: Food Citizenship, Individual Responsibility, and Social Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:55:y:2023:i:3:p:544-561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.