IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v55y2023i8p1970-1988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking Polanyi's double movement through participatory justice: Land use planning in Puerto Rico

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Stokes-Ramos

Abstract

Puerto Rico has lost an alarming amount of farmland in the past century, and land distribution is highly unequal in line with broader social patterns. These problems raise the question of alternative models that can enhance socio-ecological justice, and whether the reversal of the historical neglect of agriculture could factor significantly into such alternatives. A significant step toward such a reversal was arguably Puerto Rico's 2015 Plan de Uso de Terrenos (Land Use Plan) (PUT), the first island-level land use plan. I analyze the PUT as a Polanyian double movement to protect agricultural land from circulating as an urban asset, with the novel addition of environmental justice's “trivalent†notion of social justice. I argue that participatory justice, in particular, played a dual role in this “double movement†: first, the process achieved sufficient balance amongst actors to protect significant agricultural area from urban development; and second, the constituency mobilized through the PUT's creation later proved essential to the plan's defence against land marketization efforts. My analysis offers a unique synthesis of environmental justice and heterodox political economy and concludes that deepening dialogue across the two literatures can offer important insights for achieving emancipatory socio-ecological change in land use planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Stokes-Ramos, 2023. "Rethinking Polanyi's double movement through participatory justice: Land use planning in Puerto Rico," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(8), pages 1970-1988, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:55:y:2023:i:8:p:1970-1988
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X231170190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X231170190
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X231170190?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goodwin, Geoff, 2018. "Rethinking the double movement: expanding the frontiers of Polanyian analysis in the Global South," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87253, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Jamie Peck, 2013. "Disembedding Polanyi: Exploring Polanyian Economic Geographies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(7), pages 1536-1544, July.
    3. Jamie Peck, 2013. "For Polanyian Economic Geographies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(7), pages 1545-1568, July.
    4. Scott Prudham, 2013. "Men and Things: Karl Polanyi, Primitive Accumulation, and Their Relevance to a Radical Green Political Economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(7), pages 1569-1587, July.
    5. Geoff Goodwin, 2018. "Rethinking the Double Movement: Expanding the Frontiers of Polanyian Analysis in the Global South," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(5), pages 1268-1290, September.
    6. Geoff Goodwin, 2022. "Double Movements and Disembedded Economies: A Response to Richard Sandbrook," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(3), pages 676-702, May.
    7. Diana Stuart & Ryan Gunderson & Brian Petersen, 2019. "Climate Change and the Polanyian Counter-movement: Carbon Markets or Degrowth?," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 89-102, January.
    8. Goodwin, Geoff, 2022. "Double movements and disembedded economies: a response to Richard Sandbrook," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113686, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Berndt & Marion Werner & Víctor Ramiro Fernández, 2020. "Postneoliberalism as institutional recalibration: Reading Polanyi through Argentina’s soy boom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 216-236, February.
    2. Geoff Goodwin, 2024. "Uneven decommodification geographies: Exploring variation across the centre and periphery," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(3), pages 883-904, May.
    3. Damien Cahill, 2020. "Market analysis beyond market fetishism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 27-45, February.
    4. Geoff Goodwin, 2022. "Double Movements and Disembedded Economies: A Response to Richard Sandbrook," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(3), pages 676-702, May.
    5. Anitra Baliga, 2024. "Chasing land, chasing crisis: Interrogating speculative urban development through developers’ pursuit of land commodification in Mumbai," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(2), pages 349-366, March.
    6. Spies-Butcher, Ben & Bryant, Gareth, 2024. "The history and future of the tax state: Possibilities for a new fiscal politics beyond neoliberalism," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Ingmar Pastak & Anneli KÄHRIK, 2021. "SYMBOLIC DISPLACEMENT REVISITED: Place‐making Narratives in Gentrifying Neighbourhoods of Tallinn," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 814-834, September.
    8. Laura Aufrère & Philippe Eynaud & Lionel Maurel & Corinne Vercher-Chaptal, 2020. "How to conceptualize an alternative to platform capitalism according to the re-embedding process of K. Polanyi ? [Comment penser l'alternative au capitalisme de plateforme dans une logique de réenc," Working Papers hal-02536020, HAL.
    9. Priti Narayan & Emily Rosenman, 2022. "From crisis to the everyday: Shouldn't we all be writing economies?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(2), pages 392-404, March.
    10. Nick Bernards, 2019. "Tracing mutations of neoliberal development governance: ‘Fintech’, failure and the politics of marketization," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(7), pages 1442-1459, October.
    11. Pablo Mendez, 2016. "Professional experts and lay knowledge in Vancouver’s accessory apartment rental market," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(11), pages 2223-2238, November.
    12. Rajiv Sharma & Eric Knight, 2016. "The Role of Information Density in Infrastructure Investment," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 520-534, December.
    13. Xiaobo Su & Zhigang Chen, 2017. "Embeddedness and migrant tourism entrepreneurs: A Polanyian perspective," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(3), pages 652-669, March.
    14. Christian Berndt & Norma M. Rantisi & Jamie Peck, 2020. "M/market frontiers," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 14-26, February.
    15. Premilla D’Cruz & Ernesto Noronha & Muneeb Ul Lateef Banday & Saikat Chakraborty, 2022. "Place Matters: (Dis)embeddedness and Child Labourers’ Experiences of Depersonalized Bullying in Indian Bt Cottonseed Global Production Networks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 241-263, March.
    16. Gareth Bryant & Ben Spies-Butcher, 2020. "Bringing finance inside the state: How income-contingent loans blur the boundaries between debt and tax," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 111-129, February.
    17. Daniel G Cockayne, 2018. "Underperformative economies: Discrimination and gendered ideas of workplace culture in San Francisco’s digital media sector," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(4), pages 756-772, June.
    18. Quintin Bradley, 2022. "The accountancy of marketisation: Fictional markets in housing land supply," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(3), pages 493-507, May.
    19. Clausen, Laura Tolnov & Rudolph, David, 2020. "Renewable energy for sustainable rural development: Synergies and mismatches," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Goodwin, Geoff, 2022. "Double movements and disembedded economies: a response to Richard Sandbrook," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113686, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:55:y:2023:i:8:p:1970-1988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.