IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v53y2021i2p261-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land grabs reexamined: Gulf Arab agro-commodity chains and spaces of extraction

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Henderson

Abstract

Research on land grabs has identified the Gulf Arab states as major actors in the acquisition of agricultural land. However the role of these investments in the economies of the Gulf remains underexplored in the scholarly literature. In response, I propose that these projects are part of commodity chains that are articulated to the agribusiness industry in the Gulf states. I argue that they are extractive zones; enclaves created through articulation to the investor states, and disarticulation from their host society. With this considered, the commodity chains that link these projects with the Gulf economies transfer surplus value in the form of labour time, but also biophysical matter such as water, energy, and soil nutrients. This focus on the appropriation of nature allows a better understanding of these schemes and their role in the Gulf’s economic growth. As will be demonstrated, the cycle of exhaustion of water impells the location of these land grabs, and this context connects them with the history of domestic projects. This article uses a framework that integrates theory on the spatial contestations of commodity chains with work on political ecology, and by doing so it contributes to a growing body of work that examines the relationship between networks of commodity production and nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Henderson, 2021. "Land grabs reexamined: Gulf Arab agro-commodity chains and spaces of extraction," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 261-279, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:53:y:2021:i:2:p:261-279
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X20956657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X20956657
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X20956657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marion Dixon, 2014. "The land grab, finance capital, and food regime restructuring: the case of Egypt," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(140), pages 232-248, June.
    2. Jane Harrigan, 2014. "The Political Economy of Arab Food Sovereignty," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-33938-6, November.
    3. Benjamin Selwyn, 2015. "Commodity chains, creative destruction and global inequality: a class analysis," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 253-274.
    4. Elizabeth Havice & Liam Campling, 2013. "Articulating Upgrading: Island Developing States and Canned Tuna Production," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(11), pages 2610-2627, November.
    5. Derek Hall, 2013. "Primitive Accumulation, Accumulation by Dispossession and the Global Land Grab," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9), pages 1582-1604, October.
    6. Fuccaro,Nelida, 2009. "Histories of City and State in the Persian Gulf," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521514354, January.
    7. Hornborg, Alf, 1998. "Towards an ecological theory of unequal exchange: articulating world system theory and ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 127-136, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eckart Woertz & Martin Keulertz, 2015. "Food trade relations of the Middle East and North Africa with tropical countries," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 7(6), pages 1101-1111, December.
    2. Goddard, Jessica J. & Kallis, Giorgos & Norgaard, Richard B., 2019. "Keeping multiple antennae up: Coevolutionary foundations for methodological pluralism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Hornborg, Alf, 2006. "Footprints in the cotton fields: The Industrial Revolution as time-space appropriation and environmental load displacement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 74-81, August.
    4. Alf Hornborg, 2025. "Unequal exchange is not primarily about monetary value," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-3, December.
    5. Steven A. Mejia, 2023. "Global inequities in the prevalence of undernourishment," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(3), pages 329-344, May.
    6. Bennett, Nathan James & Govan, Hugh & Satterfield, Terre, 2015. "Ocean grabbing," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 61-68.
      • Wehner, Nicholas & Bennett, Nathan & Govan, Hugh & Satterfield, Terre, 2015. "Ocean grabbing," MarXiv bm6pf, Center for Open Science.
    7. Angela Joya, 2021. "Food Sovereignty and the Struggle for Socio‐economic Justice in North Africa," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(1), pages 202-213, January.
    8. Tunç, Gül İpek & Akbostancı, Elif & Türüt-Aşık, Serap, 2022. "Ecological unequal exchange between Turkey and the European Union: An assessment from value added perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Abu Hatab, Assem, 2015. "The Impact of Regional Integration on Intra-Arab Trade in Agrifood Commodities: A Panel Data Approach," MPRA Paper 67991, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Jun 2015.
    10. H. Charles J. Godfray & Sherman Robinson, 2015. "Contrasting approaches to projecting long-run global food security," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 31(1), pages 26-44.
    11. Centner, Ryan, 2020. "On not being Dubai: infrastructures of urban cultural policy in Istanbul & Beirut," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105050, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Kosoy, Nicolás & Corbera, Esteve, 2010. "Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1228-1236, April.
    13. Muradian, Roldan & Martinez-Alier, Joan, 2001. "Trade and the environment: from a 'Southern' perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 281-297, February.
    14. Ollinaho, Ossi I. & Kröger, Markus, 2023. "Separating the two faces of “bioeconomy”: Plantation economy and sociobiodiverse economy in Brazil," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    15. Lehmann, Ina & Martin, Adrian & Fisher, Janet A., 2018. "Why Should Ecosystem Services Be Governed to Support Poverty Alleviation? Philosophical Perspectives on Positions in the Empirical Literature," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 265-273.
    16. Althouse, Jeffrey & Cahen-Fourot, Louison & Carballa-Smichowski, Bruno & Durand, Cédric & Knauss, Steven, 2023. "Ecologically unequal exchange and uneven development patterns along global value chains," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    17. Woods, Kevin M., 2020. "Smaller-scale land grabs and accumulation from below: Violence, coercion and consent in spatially uneven agrarian change in Shan State, Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    18. Joshua Abbott & James L. Anderson & Liam Campling & Rögnvaldur Hannesson & Elizabeth Havice & M. Susan Lozier & Martin D. Smith & Michael J. Wilberg, 2014. "Steering the Global Partnership for Oceans," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16.
    19. Demaria, Federico, 2010. "Shipbreaking at Alang-Sosiya (India): An ecological distribution conflict," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 250-260, December.
    20. Triantis, Loukas, 2018. "The post-socialist restitution of property as dispossession: Social dynamics and land development in Southern Albania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 584-592.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:53:y:2021:i:2:p:261-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.