IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v45y2024i2p111-136.html

Oil Company Investment in Offshore Windfarms: A Business Case

Author

Listed:
  • Petter Osmundsen
  • Magne Emhjellen-Stendal
  • Sindre Lorentzen

Abstract

European petroleum majors have moved into offshore windfarm projects, with large investments and ambitious capacity and production targets. In aggressive bidding for Contracts for Difference in the UK, where oil companies have played a key part, we have seen the inflation-adjusted strike price fall 65% from 2015 to 2019. Researchers question whether LCOE will fall to the same extent and would like to see more research on the economic return of the companies making offshore wind investment. We address this by a transparent project economics analysis of the UK bottom-fixed Dogger Bank project. It is the largest offshore windfarm project in the world under development and the UK is the country with highest off-shore wind capacity. The project is owned by Equinor, SSE Renewables and ENI. Our analysis shows that the project is expected to be unprofitable. Several of the input variables, however, are subject to considerable estimation uncertainty. We also present a low case and a high case scenario. Decomposition of the high case reveals factors that can contribute to a profitable wind power industry. We discuss financial issues facing oil company investment portfolios combining low return/ low risk renewables and high return/high risk petroleum. Offshore windfarms are organised as special purpose vehicle (SPV) companies. We analyse the economic interactions between the SPVs and the oil companies, and address accounting and financial issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Petter Osmundsen & Magne Emhjellen-Stendal & Sindre Lorentzen, 2024. "Oil Company Investment in Offshore Windfarms: A Business Case," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(2), pages 111-136, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:45:y:2024:i:2:p:111-136
    DOI: 10.5547/01956574.44.6.posm
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/01956574.44.6.posm
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/01956574.44.6.posm?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:aen:journl:ej41-3-lawell is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Ketterer, Janina C., 2014. "The impact of wind power generation on the electricity price in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 270-280.
    3. Christian Koch, 2012. "Contested overruns and performance of offshore wind power plants," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(8), pages 609-622, April.
    4. Williams, Eric & Hittinger, Eric & Carvalho, Rexon & Williams, Ryan, 2017. "Wind power costs expected to decrease due to technological progress," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 427-435.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rögnvaldur Hannesson, 2025. "An Electricity Market Model with Intermittent Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-11, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Das, Saptarshi & Hittinger, Eric & Williams, Eric, 2020. "Learning is not enough: Diminishing marginal revenues and increasing abatement costs of wind and solar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 634-644.
    2. Santhakumar, Srinivasan & Smart, Gavin & Noonan, Miriam & Meerman, Hans & Faaij, André, 2022. "Technological progress observed for fixed-bottom offshore wind in the EU and UK," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. F. Durante & A. Gatto & F. Ravazzolo, 2024. "Understanding relationships with the Aggregate Zonal Imbalance using copulas," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 33(2), pages 513-554, April.
    4. Angelica Gianfreda & Francesco Ravazzolo & Luca Rossini, 2023. "Large Time‐Varying Volatility Models for Hourly Electricity Prices," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 85(3), pages 545-573, June.
    5. Durmaz, Tunç, 2016. "Precautionary Storage in Electricity Markets," Discussion Papers 2016/5, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    6. Olukunle O. Owolabi & Kathryn Lawson & Sanhita Sengupta & Yingsi Huang & Lan Wang & Chaopeng Shen & Mila Getmansky Sherman & Deborah A. Sunter, 2022. "A Robust Statistical Analysis of the Role of Hydropower on the System Electricity Price and Price Volatility," Papers 2203.02089, arXiv.org.
    7. Marchetti, Isabella & Rego, Erik Eduardo, 2022. "The impact of hourly pricing for renewable generation projects in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 601-617.
    8. Billé, Anna Gloria & Gianfreda, Angelica & Del Grosso, Filippo & Ravazzolo, Francesco, 2023. "Forecasting electricity prices with expert, linear, and nonlinear models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 570-586.
    9. Herve Kabanda & Alex Romard & Fuze Yurtsever & Anjali Wadhera & Joshua Andrews & Craig Merrett, 2021. "Construction Time Estimation Function for Canadian Utility Scale Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Manuel Frondel & Stephan Sommer & Colin Vance, 2015. "The burden of Germanyùs energy transition: An empirical analysis of distributional effects," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(c), pages 89-99.
    11. Thao Pham & Killian Lemoine, 2020. "Impacts of subsidized renewable electricity generation on spot market prices in Germany : Evidence from a GARCH model with panel data," Working Papers hal-02568268, HAL.
    12. Kruyt, Bert & Lehning, Michael & Kahl, Annelen, 2017. "Potential contributions of wind power to a stable and highly renewable Swiss power supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 1-11.
    13. repec:dui:wpaper:1504 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Goodarzi, Shadi & Perera, H. Niles & Bunn, Derek, 2019. "The impact of renewable energy forecast errors on imbalance volumes and electricity spot prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Christopher Kath & Florian Ziel, 2018. "The value of forecasts: Quantifying the economic gains of accurate quarter-hourly electricity price forecasts," Papers 1811.08604, arXiv.org.
    16. Lyu, Chenyan & Do, Hung Xuan & Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2024. "Volatility spillovers and carbon price in the Nordic wholesale electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. David Newbery, 2023. "High renewable electricity penetration: marginal curtailment and market failure under "subsidy-free" entry," Working Papers EPRG2319, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    18. Shi Chen & Wolfgang Karl Hardle & Brenda L'opez Cabrera, 2020. "Regularization Approach for Network Modeling of German Power Derivative Market," Papers 2009.09739, arXiv.org.
    19. Mwampashi, Muthe Mathias & Nikitopoulos, Christina Sklibosios & Konstandatos, Otto & Rai, Alan, 2021. "Wind generation and the dynamics of electricity prices in Australia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    20. Szabó, Dávid Zoltán & Csóka, Péter & Janosik, Réka, 2025. "The optimal timing of clean technology adoption: A stochastic cost–benefit analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    21. Serhan Cevik & Keitaro Ninomiya, 2023. "Chasing the sun and catching the wind: Energy transition and electricity prices in Europe," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 47(4), pages 912-935, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:45:y:2024:i:2:p:111-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.