IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v39y2018i4p153-180.html

The Role of Attitudes and Marketing in Consumer Behaviours in the British Retail Electricity Market

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Flores
  • Catherine Waddams Price

Abstract

We examine characteristics associated with consumer (dis)engagement in the residential electricity market, a topic of increasing policy interest and intervention, introducing consumer attitudes and marketing recall as new factors. General attitudes are closely associated with electricity market activity, with considerable variation in the strength and statistical significance of these relationships, indicating very different motivations amongst consumers. Recall of direct marketing routes has little identifiable effect, while advice of family and friends is influential.We identify implications for communication by both suppliers and policy makers seeking to improve the functioning of such markets, including the necessity for a variety of approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Flores & Catherine Waddams Price, 2018. "The Role of Attitudes and Marketing in Consumer Behaviours in the British Retail Electricity Market," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(4), pages 153-180, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:39:y:2018:i:4:p:153-180
    DOI: 10.5547/01956574.39.4.mflo
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/01956574.39.4.mflo
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/01956574.39.4.mflo?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilson, Chris M., 2012. "Market frictions: A unified model of search costs and switching costs," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1070-1086.
    2. repec:aen:journl:ej38-6-xiaoping is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feldhaus, Christoph & Lingens, Jörg & Löschel, Andreas & Zunker, Gerald, 2024. "The intrinsic value of decision rights: Field evidence from electricity contract choice automation," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Shandelle Steadman & Anna Rita Bennato & Monica Giulietti, 2024. "Would You Like to Trade Your Energy? A Comparative Survey Experiment on Energy Trading Platforms," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(3), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Hester M. Huisman & Evert de Haan & Machiel Mulder & Jaap E. Wieringa, 2026. "The impact of energy retailers’ loyalty programmes on the effectiveness of regulation of retail energy markets," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 1-33, December.
    4. Defeuilley, Christophe, 2025. "Retail electricity markets in Europe: Taking stock, looking ahead," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Thomasi, Virginia & Siluk, Julio Cezar M. & Rigo, Paula D. & Pappis, Cesar Augusto de O., 2024. "Challenges, improvements, and opportunities market with the liberalization of the residential electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Yiang & Olmstead, Derek E.H. & Wilkins, Andrew H., 2025. "What drives consumers to switch retailers? Evidence from the Alberta electricity market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    2. Miguel Cuellar & Hyunseok Jung, 2025. "Mass Shootings, Community Mobility, and the Relocation of Economic Activity," Papers 2502.19640, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    3. Michael Grubb, 2015. "Failing to Choose the Best Price: Theory, Evidence, and Policy," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 47(3), pages 303-340, November.
    4. Stephen Littlechild, 2020. "An Overall Customer Satisfaction score for GB energy suppliers," Working Papers EPRG2027, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    5. Luisa Dressler & Stefan Weiergraeber, 2023. "Alert the Inert? Switching Costs and Limited Awareness in Retail Electricity Markets," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 74-116, February.
    6. Bruce Mountain & Kelly Burns, 2021. "Loyalty taxes in retail electricity markets: not as they seem?," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Peter D., Lunn & Sean, Lyons, 2017. "Consumer switching intentions for telecoms services: evidence from Ireland," MPRA Paper 77412, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Catherine Waddams Price & Minyan Zhu, 2016. "Empirical Evidence Of Consumer Response In Regulated Markets," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 113-149.
    9. Wilson, Chris M., 2016. "Information Matters: A Theoretical Comparison of Some Cross-Border Trade Barriers," EconStor Preprints 130180, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    10. Irene Maria Buso & John Hey, 2021. "Why do consumers not switch? An experimental investigation of a search and switch model," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 445-476, November.
    11. Esplin, Ryan & Best, Rohan & Scranton, Jessica & Chai, Andreas, 2022. "Who pays the loyalty tax? The relationship between socioeconomic status and switching in Australia's retail electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    12. Daniel Garcia & Jun Honda & Maarten Janssen, 2017. "The Double Diamond Paradox," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(3), pages 63-99, August.
    13. Wilson, Chris M. & Garrod, Luke & Munro, Alistair, 2013. "Default effects, transaction costs, and imperfect information," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 213-215.
    14. Muyi Yang & Yuanying Chi & Kristy Mamaril & Adam Berry & Xunpeng Shi & Liming Zhu, 2020. "Communication-Based Approach for Promoting Energy Consumer Switching: Some Evidence from Ofgem’s Database Trials in the United Kingdom," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Miguel Flores & Catherine Waddams Price, 2013. "Consumer behaviour in the British retail electricity market," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2013-10, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    16. Xiaoping He & David Reiner, 2018. "Consumer Engagement in Energy Markets: The Role of Information and Knowledge," Working Papers EPRG 1835, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    17. Guo, Bowei & Weeks, Melvyn, 2022. "Dynamic tariffs, demand response, and regulation in retail electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    18. Jõeveer, Karin & Kepp, Kaido, 2023. "What drives drivers? Switching, learning, and the impact of claims in car insurance," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    19. repec:oxf:wpaper:1066 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Elisabeth Honka, 2014. "Quantifying search and switching costs in the US auto insurance industry," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(4), pages 847-884, December.
    21. Monica Giulietti & Michael Waterson & Matthijs Wildenbeest, 2014. "Estimation of Search Frictions in the British Electricity Market," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 555-590, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:39:y:2018:i:4:p:153-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.