IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v26y2015i4p660-677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legislative regulation of global value chains to protect workers: A preliminary assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Rawling

Abstract

This article argues for domestic legislative regulation of global value chains to protect offshore workers. First, it outlines the policy reasons necessitating such legislation. Empirical evidence confirms that global value chains are a dominant feature of the global economy. It is contended that lead firms wield influence in global value chains in a manner which leads to poor outcomes for offshore workers. Second, the article sets out the minimum steps necessary for a domestic state to attribute the responsibility for transparency of global value chains to lead firms. Then, it proceeds to explore the possibilities and limits of the proposed scheme of regulation. Despite some complexities with implementing the scheme, it is argued that if domestic legislative regulation of global value chains strengthens even to a small extent the monitoring of global labour issues, it is worth pursuing.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Rawling, 2015. "Legislative regulation of global value chains to protect workers: A preliminary assessment," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 26(4), pages 660-677, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:660-677
    DOI: 10.1177/1035304615615513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1035304615615513
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1035304615615513?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Pickles & Shengjun Zhu, 2013. "The California Transparency in Supply Chains Act," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series ctg-2013-15, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    2. Gary Gereffi, 2014. "Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 9-37, February.
    3. Jeffrey Neilson & Bill Pritchard & Henry Wai-chung Yeung, 2014. "Global value chains and global production networks in the changing international political economy: An introduction," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 1-8, February.
    4. De Backer, Koen & Miroudot, Sébastien, 2014. "Mapping global value chains," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 37176.
    5. Gereffi, Gary & Luo, Xubei, 2014. "Risks and opportunities of participation in global value chains," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6847, The World Bank.
    6. Koen De Backer & Norihiko Yamano, 2012. "International Comparative Evidence on Global Value Chains," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2012/3, OECD Publishing.
    7. Amanda Wise, 2013. "Pyramid subcontracting and moral detachment: Down-sourcing risk and responsibility in the management of transnational labour in Asia," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 24(3), pages 433-455, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María J Paz & Mario Rísquez & María E Ruiz-Gálvez, 2022. "Inter-firm power relations and working conditions under new production models," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(1), pages 138-157, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nataša Vrh, 2017. "The convergence in domestic value-added of exports in the EU," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 405-430, July.
    2. Vrh, Nataša, 2015. "Pay-off to Participation in Global Value Chains: How Much are New EU Member States Lagging behind the Rest of EU Countries in Terms of Domestic Value Added in Exports?," MPRA Paper 67805, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Valentine Fays & Benoît Mahy & François Rycx, 2023. "Wage differences according to workers' origin: The role of working more upstream in GVCs," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 37(2), pages 319-342, June.
    4. João Amador & Sónia Cabral, 2017. "Networks of Value-added Trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(7), pages 1291-1313, July.
    5. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-01368948 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Bruno Carballa Smichowski & Cédric Durand & Steven Knauss, 2016. "Uneven development patterns in global value chains," Working Papers hal-01368948, HAL.
    7. Lorenzo Cresti & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2023. "Weak sectors and weak ties? Labour dependence and asymmetric positioning in GVCs," LEM Papers Series 2023/10, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    8. Cédric Durand & David Flacher & Vincent Frigant, 2018. "Étudier les chaînes globales de valeur comme une forme d’organisation industrielle," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 13-34.
    9. Jyrki Ali-Yrkkö & Petri Rouvinen, 2015. "Slicing Up Global Value Chains: a Micro View," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 69-85, March.
    10. André Sapir & Reinhilde Veugelers & Georg Zachmann & Guntram B. Wolff & Michael Blanga-Gubbay, . "Manufacturing Europe’s future," Bruegel Blueprints, Bruegel, number 795.
    11. Andrea Szalavetz, 2016. "Post‐crisis developments in global value chains - example of foreign investors’ Hungarian subsidiaries," IWE Working Papers 219, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    12. Ari Van Assche & Byron Gangnes, . "Global value chains and the fragmentation of trade policy coalitions," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    13. Christian Sellar, 2019. "Transnationalizing bureaucracies through investment promotion: The case of Informest," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(3), pages 461-479, May.
    14. Pipkin, Seth & Fuentes, Alberto, 2017. "Spurred to Upgrade: A Review of Triggers and Consequences of Industrial Upgrading in the Global Value Chain Literature," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 536-554.
    15. Reis, Tiago N.P. dos & Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Russo Lopes, Gabriela & Meyfroidt, Patrick, 2024. "Not all supply chains are created equal: The linkages between soy local trade relations and development outcomes in Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    16. Altenburg, Tilman & Kleinz, Maria & Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2016. "Directing structural change: from tools to policy," IDOS Discussion Papers 24/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    17. Stephanie Barrientos & Gary Gereffi & John Pickles, 2016. "New dynamics of upgrading in global value chains: Shifting terrain for suppliers and workers in the global south," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(7), pages 1214-1219, July.
    18. Soo Yeon Kim & B. Peter Rosendorff, 2021. "Firms, states, and global production," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 405-414, November.
    19. Angela Tregear & à ron Török & Matthew Gorton, 2016. "Geographical indications and upgrading of small-scale producers in global agro-food chains: A case study of the Makó Onion Protected Designation of Origin," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(2), pages 433-451, February.
    20. Jan Fagerberg & Bengt-Åke Lundvall & Martin Srholec, 2018. "Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(3), pages 533-556, July.
    21. Ten Brink, Tobias & Butollo, Florian, 2018. "A great leap? Domestic market growth and local state support in the upgrading of China's LED lighting industry," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 18(2), pages 285-306.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance
    • L5 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:26:y:2015:i:4:p:660-677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.