IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v31y2010i1p7-33.html

Statutory Union Recognition Provisions as Stimulants to Employer Anti-Unionism in Three Anglo-Saxon Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Gregor Gall

    (University of Hertfordshire)

Abstract

This article examines why employer opposition is stimulated by the introduction of statutory union recognition provisions in Britain, Ireland and the US. It examines the impact of the provisions for encouraging union organizing, which in turn stimulates employer anti-unionism, which then negates the intention of the provisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregor Gall, 2010. "Statutory Union Recognition Provisions as Stimulants to Employer Anti-Unionism in Three Anglo-Saxon Countries," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 31(1), pages 7-33, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:31:y:2010:i:1:p:7-33
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X09343991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X09343991
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X09343991?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick C. Flood & Bill Toner, 1997. "Large Non-Union Companies: How Do They Avoid a Catch 22?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 257-277, June.
    2. Daryl D’Art & Thomas Turner, 1999. "An Attitudinal Revolution in Irish Industrial Relations: The End of ‘Them and Us’?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 37(1), pages 101-116, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriella Alberti, 2016. "Moving beyond the dichotomy of workplace and community unionism: The challenges of organising migrant workers in London’s hotels," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 37(1), pages 73-94, February.
    2. Mark Harcourt & Gregor Gall & Margaret Wilson & Korey Rubenstein & Sudong Shang, 2022. "Public support for a union default: Predicting factors and implications for public policy," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(3), pages 1095-1118, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jimmy Donaghey, 2008. "Deliberation, Employment Relations and Social Partnership in the Republic of Ireland," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 29(1), pages 35-63, February.
    2. Daryl D'Art & Thomas Turner, 2008. "Workers and the Demand for Trade Unions in Europe: Still a Relevant Social Force?," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 29(2), pages 165-191, May.
    3. Alan Eustace, 2024. "Dancing at the crossroads: Lessons from Ireland on collective labour law reform," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 303-325, July.
    4. Willman, Paul, 2000. "The viability of trade union organisation: a bargaining unit analysis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20159, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Bruce Kaufman, 2014. "Explaining Breadth and Depth of Employee Voice across Firms: A Voice Factor Demand Model," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 296-319, September.
    6. Jimmy Donaghey & Niall Cullinane & Tony Dundon & Adrian Wilkinson, 2011. "Reconceptualising employee silence," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 25(1), pages 51-67, March.
    7. Desmond Tutu Ayentimi & John Burgess & Kantha Dayaram, 2019. "Union suppression and union substitution strategies of multinational enterprises in Ghana," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 379-398, July.
    8. Thomas Turner & Michelle O'Sullivan, 2013. "Speaking up: employee voice and attitudes to unions in a non-union US multinational firm," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 154-170, March.
    9. Lorraine Ryan & Thomas Turner, 2021. "Does work socialisation matter? Worker engagement in political activities, attachment to democracy and openness to immigration," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 125-144, March.
    10. Dongmin Kong & Jia Liu & Yanan Wang & Ling Zhu, 2024. "Employee Stock Ownership Plans and Corporate Environmental Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 177-199, January.
    11. Michelle O'Sullivan & Thomas Turner, 2013. "Facilitators and Inhibitors of Collective Action: A Case Study of a US-Owned Manufacturing Plant," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 689-708, December.
    12. Adesubomi Abolade Dupe, 2015. "Organisational Communication, The Panacea For Improved Labour Relations," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 5-16, August.
    13. Dong-One Kim, 2009. "Employees' Perspective on Non-Union Representation: A Comparison with Unions," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 30(1), pages 120-151, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:31:y:2010:i:1:p:7-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.