IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v12y1991i4p439-467.html

Productive Forces and Industrial Citizenship: An Evolutionary Perspective on Labour Relations

Author

Listed:
  • Walther Mller-Jentsch

    (Paderbom University)

Abstract

This paper presents the historical development of productive forces and citizenship rights and their mutual interference. The general hypothesis is that the organization of the capitalist labour process is mainly shaped by the state of productive forces and by the legal and political status of labour in civil society. By delineating the development of productive forces, the author makes use of the concept of 'industrial revolution' and describes a sequence of three distinct industrial revolutions and their main characteristics. Having sketched the contours of the organization and control of the labour process in the first and second industrial revolutions, the main challenges and opportunities of the third industrial revolution are discussed with the two following conclusions: (1) a convergence of the imperatives of the productive forces with the 'rising expectations' of workers could positively determine future labour relations in mature civil societies; (2) new tensions, however, may arise out of tendencies towards 'industrial feudalism' and a 'new hierarchical order' in hightech production.

Suggested Citation

  • Walther Mller-Jentsch, 1991. "Productive Forces and Industrial Citizenship: An Evolutionary Perspective on Labour Relations," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 12(4), pages 439-467, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:12:y:1991:i:4:p:439-467
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X91124002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X91124002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X91124002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Bezanson, 1922. "The Early Use of the Term Industrial Revolution," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 36(2), pages 343-349.
    2. Paul S. Adler & Bryan Borys, 1989. "Automation and Skill: Three Generations of Research on the NC Case," Politics & Society, , vol. 17(3), pages 377-402, September.
    3. Nef, John U., 1943. "The Industrial Revolution Reconsidered1," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-31, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taymaz, Erol, 1991. "Flexible automation in the U.S. engineering industries," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 557-572, December.
    2. Armand M. Leroi & Ben Lambert & Matthias Mauch & Marina Papadopoulou & Sophia Ananiadou & Staffan I. Lindberg & Patrik Lindenfors, 2020. "On revolutions," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Klingenberg, Cristina Orsolin & Borges, Marco Antônio Viana & Antunes, José Antônio do Vale, 2022. "Industry 4.0: What makes it a revolution? A historical framework to understand the phenomenon," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. repec:ehl:lserod:22337 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Mario Arturo Ruiz Estrada, 2025. "Is it possible to assess the speed of development embedded by any industrial revolution on the society? An analysis under the application of the IRIDS-Index," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 4137-4157, October.
    6. Jurica Šimurina & Josip Tica, 2006. "Historical Perspective of the Role of Technology in Economic Development," EFZG Working Papers Series 0610, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb.
    7. Nicolas Devijlder & Koen Schoors, 2020. "Land rights, local financial development and industrial activity: evidence from Flanders (nineteenth–early twentieth century)," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 14(3), pages 507-550, September.
    8. Michael J., Handel, 2004. "Implications of Information Technology for Employment, Skills, and Wages: Findings from Sectoral and Case Study Research," MPRA Paper 80241, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Michael Barrett & Eivor Oborn & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2012. "Reconfiguring Boundary Relations: Robotic Innovations in Pharmacy Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1448-1466, October.
    10. Jonna M. Yarrington, 2018. "Sucre indigène and sucre colonial: Reconsidering the splitting of the French national sugar market, 1800–1860," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 20-31, January.
    11. Jos Benders, 1995. "Output Characteristics as Input in the Skilling Debate," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 9(2), pages 329-342, June.
    12. Erol Taymaz, 1991. "The Impact of Trade Unions on the Diffusion of Technology: The Case of NC Machine Tools," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 305-311, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:12:y:1991:i:4:p:439-467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.