IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v682y2019i1p60-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extrinsic and Intrinsic Work Values: Findings on Equivalence in Different Cultural Contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Maurice Gesthuizen
  • Daniel Kovarek
  • Carolin Rapp

Abstract

Academic literature emphasizes the importance of work values to job satisfaction and commitment. There is agreement that work values are multidimensional—most often identified as having extrinsic and intrinsic elements. However, little work has gone into assessing the measurement invariance of work values in different contexts. In this contribution, we ask, Do we find similar patterns of extrinsic and intrinsic work values across different cultural contexts? As such, we investigate the validity of work values when they are applied in cross-national analyses by identifying sets of items that can be translated into scales of extrinsic and intrinsic work values that carry a similar meaning in those cultural contexts. We thus want to know which items that make up work values are best understood in diverse contexts and are most suitable for cross-cultural analysis. We tackle this issue by relying on the European Values Study 2008, as well as the CUPESSE data from 2016. The results reveal that there is a trade-off between the number of items researchers use to study work values and the number of countries analyzed if we aim for a more equivalent analysis of work values across Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurice Gesthuizen & Daniel Kovarek & Carolin Rapp, 2019. "Extrinsic and Intrinsic Work Values: Findings on Equivalence in Different Cultural Contexts," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 682(1), pages 60-83, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:682:y:2019:i:1:p:60-83
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716219829016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716219829016
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716219829016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anneli KAASA, 2011. "Work Values in European Countries: Empirical Evidence and Explanations," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(5), pages 852-862, December.
    2. Sven Hauff & Stefan Kirchner, 2015. "Identifying work value patterns: cross-national comparison and historical dynamics," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(2), pages 151-168, May.
    3. van der Ark, L. Andries, 2012. "New Developments in Mokken Scale Analysis in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i05).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Scholten, Lincy & Betkó, János & Gesthuizen, Maurice & Fransen-Kuppens, Gerdine & de Vet, Renée & Wolf, Judith, 2023. "Reciprocal relations between financial hardship, sense of societal belonging and mental health for social assistance recipients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    2. Max Haller & Beate Klösch & Markus Hadler, 2023. "The Centrality of Work: A Comparative Analysis of Work Commitment and Work Orientation in Present-Day Societies," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    3. Richelito P. Maagad & Nestor C. Nabe, 2022. "Workplace Spirituality and Work Values of Philippine National Police Personnel in Davao City," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(3), pages 123-131, March.
    4. repec:thr:techub:10018:y:2021:i:1:p:444-464 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Senhu Wang & Liran Morav, 2021. "Exploring Extrinsic and Intrinsic Work Values of British Ethnic Minorities: The Roles of Demographic Background, Job Characteristics and Immigrant Generation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    2. César Merino-Soto & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Verónica López-Fernández & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-L): Psychometric and Measurement Invariance Evidence in Peruvian Undergraduate Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Henry Santa-Cruz-Espinoza & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Julio Domínguez-Vergara & César Merino-Soto, 2023. "Internal Structure of the Work–Family Conflict Questionnaire (WFCQ) in Teacher Teleworking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. repec:thr:techub:10018:y:2021:i:1:p:444-464 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Jesper Tijmstra & Maria Bolsinova, 2019. "Bayes Factors for Evaluating Latent Monotonicity in Polytomous Item Response Theory Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(3), pages 846-869, September.
    6. Alessandro Chiarotto & Annette Bishop & Nadine E Foster & Kirsty Duncan & Ebenezer Afolabi & Raymond W Ostelo & Muirne C S Paap, 2018. "Item response theory evaluation of the biomedical scale of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Simon Foster & Meichun Mohler-Kuo, 2020. "The proportion of non-depressed subjects in a study sample strongly affects the results of psychometric analyses of depression symptoms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Bastiaan Bruinsma, 2020. "A comparison of measures to validate scales in voting advice applications," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1299-1316, August.
    9. César Merino-Soto & Manuel Fernández-Arata & Jaime Fuentes-Balderrama & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Research Perceived Competency Scale: A New Psychometric Adaptation for University Students’ Research Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Jaroslav Mihálik & Alexandra Matejková, 2022. "Mainstreaming the Gender: Measuring the Job Attributes and Gender Differences across Selected EU Member States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Max Haller & Beate Klösch & Markus Hadler, 2023. "The Centrality of Work: A Comparative Analysis of Work Commitment and Work Orientation in Present-Day Societies," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    12. Hauff, Sven & Richter, Nicole Franziska & Tressin, Tabea, 2015. "Situational job characteristics and job satisfaction: The moderating role of national culture," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 710-723.
    13. Andersson-Hudson, Jessica & Rose, Jonathan & Humphrey, Mathew & Knight, Wil & O'Hara, Sarah, 2019. "The structure of attitudes towards shale gas extraction in the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 693-697.
    14. Penny Bee & Chris Gibbons & Patrick Callaghan & Claire Fraser & Karina Lovell, 2016. "Evaluating and Quantifying User and Carer Involvement in Mental Health Care Planning (EQUIP): Co-Development of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Tyrone B. Pretorius & P. Paul Heppner & Anita Padmanabhanunni & Serena Ann Isaacs, 2023. "The PSI-20: Development of a Viable Short Form Alternative of the Problem Solving Inventory Using Item Response Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    16. Wickelmaier, Florian & Strobl, Carolin & Zeileis, Achim, 2012. "Psychoco: Psychometric Computing in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i01).
    17. Jules L. Ellis & Klaas Sijtsma, 2023. "A Test to Distinguish Monotone Homogeneity from Monotone Multifactor Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 387-412, June.
    18. Damianus Abun & Libertine Gertrude Ruadap-Macaspac & Theogenia Magallanes & Mary Joy Encarnacion & Nathanael Flores, 2021. "Measuring the Work Values and work engagement of Employees: The Philippines Context," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 18(1), pages 444-464, April.
    19. Natalia Soboleva, 2021. "The Determinants of the Link between Life Satisfaction and Job Satisfaction across Europe," HSE Working papers WP BRP 96/SOC/2021, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    20. Tendeiro, Jorge N. & Meijer, Rob R. & Niessen, A. Susan M., 2016. "PerFit: An R Package for Person-Fit Analysis in IRT," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 74(i05).
    21. Markus Pauly & Maria Umlauft & Ali Ünlü, 2018. "Resampling-Based Inference Methods for Comparing Two Coefficients Alpha," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 203-222, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:682:y:2019:i:1:p:60-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.