IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/amerec/v67y2022i2p183-194.html

Closing the Curriculum Gap by Updating Content Standards and Guidelines for Teaching Monetary Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Ihrig
  • Scott Wolla

Abstract

The topic of the Federal Reserve’s (the Fed’s) implementation of monetary policy has a significant presence in economics teaching resources. Over the past decade or so, the Fed has purposefully shifted the way it implements monetary policy, introducing a new methodology with new policy tools. Unfortunately, many teaching materials are out of date with the Fed’s current ample-reserves regime and classroom teachers are often guided to teach old content. This guidance often comes from the Voluntary National Content Standards (VNCS) in Economics and the Advanced Placement (AP) Course and Exam Description that are sadly outdated. The VNCS influences the treatment of economics content in K-12 curriculum and textbooks, and the AP course framework determines the content taught in thousands of high school classrooms every year. As such, revising these influential documents is instrumental for closing the curriculum gap. We provide recommendations for how these materials can be updated.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Ihrig & Scott Wolla, 2022. "Closing the Curriculum Gap by Updating Content Standards and Guidelines for Teaching Monetary Policy," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 67(2), pages 183-194, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:amerec:v:67:y:2022:i:2:p:183-194
    DOI: 10.1177/05694345221085678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/05694345221085678
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/05694345221085678?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jane Ihrig & Scott Wolla, 2022. "Let’s close the gap: Updating the textbook treatment of monetary policy," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 232-249, June.
    2. Richard A. MacDonald & John J. Siegfried, 2012. "Refreshing the Voluntary National Content Standards in Economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 308-314, July.
    3. John J. Siegfried & Bonnie T. Meszaros, 1998. "Voluntary Economics Content Standards for America's Schools: Rationale and Development," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 139-149, June.
    4. Jane E. Ihrig & Gretchen C. Weinbach & Scott A. Wolla, 2021. "Teaching the Linkage Between Banks and the Fed: R.I.P. Money Multiplier," Page One Economics Newsletter, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jane E. Ihrig & Scott A. Wolla, 2020. "Let's Close the Gap: Revising Teaching Materials to Reflect How the Federal Reserve Implements Monetary Policy," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2020-092, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    2. Phillip Saunders, 2011. "A history of economic education," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Bofinger, Peter & Geißendörfer, Lisa & Haas, Thomas & Mayer, Fabian, 2021. "Discovering the True Schumpeter - New Insights into the Finance and Growth Nexus," CEPR Discussion Papers 16851, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Jane Ihrig & Scott Wolla, 2023. "Teaching Monetary Policy with Ample Reserves," Journal of Economics Teaching, Journal of Economics Teaching, vol. 8(2), pages 114-127, May.
    5. William E. Becker, 2000. "Teaching Economics in the 21st Century," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 109-119, Winter.
    6. Robin Bartlett & Marianne Ferber & Carole Green, 2009. "The Committee on Economic Education: Its Effect on the Introductory Course and Women in Economics," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2-3), pages 153-172, January.
    7. Martin Kniepert, 2014. "Die (Neue) Institutionenökonomik als Ansatz für einen erweiterten, offeneren Zugang zur Volkswirtschaftslehre," Working Papers 552014, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    8. Pallante, Gianluca & Guerini, Mattia & Napoletano, Mauro & Roventini, Andrea, 2025. "Robust-less-fragile: Tackling systemic risk and financial contagion in a macro agent-based model," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. Belfield, Clive R. & Levin, Henry M., 2004. "Should high school economics courses be compulsory?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 351-360, August.
    10. Marianne Ferber, 1999. "Guidelines For Pre-College Economics Education: A Critique," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 135-142.
    11. William B. Walstad, 2001. "Economic Education in U.S. High Schools," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 195-210, Summer.
    12. Robin Bartlett & Marianne Ferber & Carole Green, 2009. "The Committee on Economic Education: Its Effect on the Introductory Course and Women in Economics," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 38(2), pages 153-172, July.
    13. Emilio Carnevali, 2022. "Competitive vs cumulative approach in teaching macroeconomics: Some thoughts on recent popular textbooks," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 75(301), pages 161-171.
    14. Dirk Ehnst, 2022. "Modern Monetary Theory: The Right Compass for Decision-Making," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 57(2), pages 128-134, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:amerec:v:67:y:2022:i:2:p:183-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/aex .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.