IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Die (Neue) Institutionenökonomik als Ansatz für einen erweiterten, offeneren Zugang zur Volkswirtschaftslehre

  • Martin Kniepert

    ()

    (Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna)

Weder die 2008 ausgebrochene Finanzkrise, noch die in den Medien laut gewordene Kritik, noch Einwürfe vereinzelter heterodoxer Ökonomen und wohl noch viel weniger die von den Betroffenen selbst, also den Studierenden, geäußerten Zweifel an der Sinnhaftigkeit der orthodoxen Ökonomie haben etwas daran geändert: Die ‚Grundlagen der Volkswirtschaftslehre‘ sowie das übliche Angebot an Nebenfachstudierende sind über die letzten Jahre wenn nicht Jahrzehnte völlig gleich geblieben. Ein Blick in die Curricula oder die dafür verwendeten Lehrbücher bestätigt dies. Um dies zu erklären, werden in dieser Arbeit zunächst Inhalte und Beschränkungen des heute orthodoxen Kanons dogmengeschichtlich hergeleitet. Überprüft wird dieser Kanon im Weiteren anhand ökonomischer Probleme der vergangenen Jahrzehnte bzw. an dem Beitrag, den die Volkswirtschaftslehre zu ihrer Lösung leisten konnte. Herausgearbeitet wird damit auch die Entwicklungsfähigkeit des Fachs bzw. das Auftreten systematischer Defizite. Zur Überwindung Letzterer wird die Erweiterung des Kanons im Sinne der (Neuen) Institutionellen Ökonomik erwogen. Auf dieser Basis wird das hiermit vorgelegte Papier mit dem Vorschlag einer detaillierten Inhaltsangabe einer Einführungsvorlesung abgeschlossen.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: ftp://ftp.boku.ac.at/pub/repecftpg/repecftp/RePEc/sed/wpaper/552014.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna in its series Working Papers with number 552014.

as
in new window

Length: 62 pages
Date of creation: Apr 2014
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:sed:wpaper:552014
Contact details of provider: Postal: Gregor-Mendel Straße 33, A-1180 Wien
Phone: +43 1 47654 3670
Fax: +43 1 47654 3692
Web page: http://www.wiso.boku.ac.at/

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Simpson, Nicole & de Araujo, Pedro & O'Sullivan, Roisin, 2012. "What should be taught in Intermediate Macroeconomics?," Working Papers 2012-01, Department of Economics, Colgate University.
  2. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages S71-102, October.
  3. Alan Blinder, 2010. "Teaching Macro Principles after the Financial Crisis," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 385-390, September.
  4. Becker, William E & Watts, Michael, 1996. "Chalk and Talk: A National Survey on Teaching Undergraduate Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(2), pages 448-53, May.
  5. John Gowdy & Jon D. Erickson, 2005. "The approach of ecological economics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 207-222, March.
  6. Michael K. Salemi, 2005. "Teaching Economic Literacy: Why, What and How," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 4(2), pages 46-57.
  7. Colander, David & Klamer, Arjo, 1987. "The Making of an Economist," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 1(2), pages 95-111, Fall.
  8. Jose Miguel Abito & Katarina Borovickova & Hays Golden & Jacob Goldin & Matthew A. Masten & Miguel Morin & Alexandre Poirier & Vincent Pons & Israel Romem & Tyler Williams & Chamna Yoon, 2011. "How Should the Graduate Economics Core be Changed?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 414-417, October.
  9. George J. Stigler, 1961. "The Economics of Information," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69, pages 213.
  10. Mark Skousen, 1997. "The Perseverance of Paul Samuelson's Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 137-152, Spring.
  11. Paul Krugman, 1990. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," NBER Working Papers 3275, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  12. Alan Freeman, 2010. "The Economists of Tomorrow," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(5), pages 1591-1613, November.
  13. Akerlof, George A, 1970. "The Market for 'Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 84(3), pages 488-500, August.
  14. William E. Becker & Michael Watts, 2001. "Teaching Economics at the Start of the 21st Century: Still Chalk-and-Talk," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(2), pages 446-451, May.
  15. Oliver E. Williamson, 2000. "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(3), pages 595-613, September.
  16. Heise, Arne, 2007. "Das Ende der neoklassischen Orthodoxie? Oder: Wieso ein methodischer Pluralismus gut täte," Working Papers on Economic Governance 21, University of Hamburg, Department of Socioeconomics.
  17. Richard A. MacDonald & John J. Siegfried, 2012. "Refreshing the Voluntary National Content Standards in Economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 308-314, July.
  18. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2002. "Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(3), pages 460-501, June.
  19. Kerry A. Pearce & Kevin D. Hoover, 1995. "After the Revolution: Paul Samuelson and the Textbook Keynesian Model," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 27(5), pages 183-216, Supplemen.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sed:wpaper:552014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eva Krickler)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.