IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v9y2015i1p1087-1097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence Of The Public Passenger Transport System On The Quality Of Urban Life. Study Case: Bucharest

Author

Listed:
  • Catalin-Ionut CIOBANU
  • Alexandru-Mihai BUGHEANU
  • Rares Constantin CIOBANU

Abstract

The quality of life (QOL) is a generic notion discussed all over the world nowadays. The present study aims to analyze a specific characteristic of the QOLin urban areas -the public transportation system,which has a direct influence on the relationship between people satisfaction and sustainable quality of life.The purpose of this article is to offer a short review of the literature and to evaluate the existent situation, in order to outline anoverview of the way in that the public transportation system in Bucharest influences on different aspects the general quality of urban life.

Suggested Citation

  • Catalin-Ionut CIOBANU & Alexandru-Mihai BUGHEANU & Rares Constantin CIOBANU, 2015. "The Influence Of The Public Passenger Transport System On The Quality Of Urban Life. Study Case: Bucharest," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 1087-1097, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:1087-1097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2015/pdf/116.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruxandra Irina POPESCU, 2009. "The Branding Potential Of Bucharest. Strategy And Success Factors," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(4(13)), pages 177-193, November.
    2. Luis Santos & Isabel Martins, 2007. "Monitoring Urban Quality of Life: The Porto Experience," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 411-425, January.
    3. Rabontu Cecilia Irina & Vasilescu Maria, 2012. "The Evolution Of Romanian Tourism In Terms Of Economic Instability," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 130-142, June.
    4. Mirela Mazilu, 2010. "A New Strategy For Relaunching Tourism In Europe," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 177-182.
    5. Fellesson, Markus & Friman, Margareta, 2008. "Perceived Satisfaction with Public Transport Service in Nine European Cities," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 47(3).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magdalena Gądek & Rafał Miśko, 2020. "Impact of urban transport innovation on the quality of life: what do passengers say?," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/20/13, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    2. Corina MARINESCU & Claudiu CICEA, 2018. "A Bibliometric Analysis Of The International Management Conference Proceedings’ Papers," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 293-306, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatih Terzi & Handan Türkoğlu & Fulin Bölen & Perver Baran & Tayfun Salihoğlu, 2015. "Residents’ Perception of Cultural Activities as Quality of Life in Istanbul," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 211-234, May.
    2. Chica-Olmo, Jorge & Gachs-Sánchez, Héctor & Lizarraga, Carmen, 2018. "Route effect on the perception of public transport services quality," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 40-48.
    3. Lora, Eduardo & Powell, Andrew, 2011. "A New Way of Monitoring the Quality of Urban Life," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 3806, Inter-American Development Bank.
    4. de Oña, Juan & Estévez, Esperanza & de Oña, Rocío, 2021. "How does private vehicle users perceive the public transport service quality in large metropolitan areas? A European comparison," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 173-188.
    5. Margareta Friman & Lina Larhult & Tommy Gärling, 2013. "An analysis of soft transport policy measures implemented in Sweden to reduce private car use," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 109-129, January.
    6. Mohammad Rezvani & Hossain Mansourian & Mohammad Sattari, 2013. "Evaluating Quality of Life in Urban Areas (Case Study: Noorabad City, Iran)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 112(1), pages 203-220, May.
    7. Stelzer, Anselmo & Englert, Frank & Hörold, Stephan & Mayas, Cindy, 2016. "Improving service quality in public transportation systems using automated customer feedback," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 259-271.
    8. Musa Pazhuhan & Saeed Zanganeh Shahraki & Niloofar Kaveerad & Sirio Cividino & Matteo Clemente & Luca Salvati, 2020. "Factors Underlying Life Quality in Urban Contexts: Evidence from an Industrial City (Arak, Iran)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Leonel Cerno & César Pérez López & Eduardo Sanz Arcega, 2017. "Determinantes de la satisfacción de los españoles con las prestaciones y servicios públicos: un enfoque de sociología tributaria con microdatos," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 220(1), pages 57-87, March.
    10. Tae‐Hyoung Tommy Gim, 2020. "The relationship between overall happiness and perceived transportation services relative to other individual and environmental variables," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 712-733, June.
    11. Laila Ait Bihi Ouali & Daniel J. Graham & Alexander Barron & Mark Trompet, 2020. "Gender differences in the perception of safety in public transport," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 737-769, June.
    12. Abenoza, Roberto F. & Liu, Chengxi & Cats, Oded & Susilo, Yusak O., 2019. "What is the role of weather, built-environment and accessibility geographical characteristics in influencing travelers’ experience?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 34-50.
    13. Chen, Dongxu & Sun, Yu & Yang, Zhongzhen, 2020. "Optimization of the travel ban scheme of cars based on the spatial distribution of the last digit of license plates," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 43-53.
    14. Manuela Bina & Federica Biassoni, 2023. "Travel Experience and Reasons for the Use and Nonuse of Local Public Transport: A Case Study within the Community Interregional Project SaMBA (Sustainable Mobility Behaviors in the Alpine Region)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Carlo Vittorio FIORIO & Massimo FLORIO & Giovanni PERUCCA, 2011. "Consumers’ satisfaction and regulation of local public transport: evidence from European cities," Departmental Working Papers 2011-26, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    16. Abenoza, Roberto F. & Cats, Oded & Susilo, Yusak O., 2017. "Travel satisfaction with public transport: Determinants, user classes, regional disparities and their evolution," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 64-84.
    17. Samaneh Khaef & Esfandiar Zebardast, 2016. "Assessing Quality of Life Dimensions in Deteriorated Inner Areas: A case from Javadieh Neighborhood in Tehran Metropolis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 761-775, June.
    18. Sofia Molander, 2018. "Changing roles and new perspectives: towards market orientation in public transport," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1811-1825, November.
    19. Sarmiza Pencea & Daniel Bulin, 2018. "Romanian Tourism Market Ten Years after Joining the European Union," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 6(1), June.
    20. Beatriz Valcárcel-Aguiar & Pilar Murias & Alexandre Vecino-Aguirre, 2022. "Liveability Versus Sustainability in Spanish Cities: First Evidences Using Synthetic Indicators," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(4), pages 1935-1960, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:1087-1097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.