IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/econmn/v13y2010i2p457-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative factors in the healthcare services

Author

Listed:
  • Claudiu CICEA

    (The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Gheorghe ALEXANDRU

    (Oil and Gas University, Ploiesti, Romania)

  • Sebastian Madalin MUNTEANU

    (The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

It is known that the efficiency of medical services is a broad social and economic concept, influenced by both numerical-quantitative and non-numerical-qualitative factors. The dynamic nature of technical progress and the accelerated pace of scientific discoveries in the field of health, enhances the size and complexity of economic issues related to assessing the efficiency of these social activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudiu CICEA & Gheorghe ALEXANDRU & Sebastian Madalin MUNTEANU, 2010. "Qualitative factors in the healthcare services," Economia. Seria Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(2), pages 457-469, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:econmn:v:13:y:2010:i:2:p:457-469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.management.ase.ro/reveconomia/2010-2/18.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Handler, A. & Issel, M. & Turnock, B., 2001. "A conceptual framework to measure performance of the public health system," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(8), pages 1235-1239.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudiu CICEA, 2011. "Consideration Regarding Cost’S Evaluation In Healthcare Area," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 1(1), pages 37-48, December.
    2. Eugenio Zucchelli & Andrew M Jones & Nigel Rice, 2012. "The evaluation of health policies through dynamic microsimulation methods," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 5(1), pages 2-20.
    3. Francisco Muñoz-Pradas, 2011. "Health intervention and decline in infant mortality rates. Milk depots in Spain (1900-1936)," UHE Working papers 2011_10, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Departament d'Economia i Història Econòmica, Unitat d'Història Econòmica.
    4. Mariam Safi & Maja L. Bertram & Gabriel Gulis, 2020. "Assessing Delivery of Selected Public Health Operations via Essential Public Health Operation Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-10, September.
    5. Wilbroad Mutale & Peter Godfrey-Fausset & Margaret Tembo Mwanamwenge & Nkatya Kasese & Namwinga Chintu & Dina Balabanova & Neil Spicer & Helen Ayles, 2013. "Measuring Health System Strengthening: Application of the Balanced Scorecard Approach to Rank the Baseline Performance of Three Rural Districts in Zambia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-11, March.
    6. Yelin Fu & Yubing Sui & Hao Luo & Biao Han, 2020. "Application of Social Choice Theory to Modify the Value Measure of Health Systems," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 1005-1019, April.
    7. Jaime Madrigano & Anita Chandra & Tracy Costigan & Joie D. Acosta, 2017. "Beyond Disaster Preparedness: Building a Resilience-Oriented Workforce for the Future," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, December.
    8. David Naranjo-Gil & María Jesús Sánchez-Expósito & Laura Gómez-Ruiz, 2016. "Traditional vs. Contemporary Management Control Practices for Developing Public Health Policies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Atul Sharma & Shankar Prinja & Arun Kumar Aggarwal, 2019. "Comprehensive measurement of health system performance at district level in India: Generation of a composite index," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1783-1799, October.
    10. Schmitt, Carol L. & Glasgow, LaShawn & Lavinghouze, S. Rene & Rieker, Patricia P. & Fulmer, Erika & McAleer, Kelly & Rogers, Todd, 2016. "Measuring infrastructure: A key step in program evaluation and planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 50-55.
    11. Sandra Jaworeck, 2022. "A New Approach for Constructing a Health Care Index including the Subjective Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Sogoric, Selma & Dzakula, Aleksandar & Rukavina, Tea Vukusic & Grozic-Zivolic, Sonja & Lazaric-Zec, Danijela & Dzono-Boban, Ankica & Brborovic, Ognjen & Lang, Slobodan & Vuletic, Silvije, 2009. "Evaluation of Croatian model of polycentric health planning and decision making," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 271-278, March.
    13. Jian Zhou & Chuhan Wang & Xinyu Zhang & Shuang Wang, 2022. "Public Health System and Socio-Economic Development Coupling Based on Systematic Theory: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, October.
    14. Ker, Jun-Ing & Wang, Yichuan & Hajli, M. Nick & Song, Jiahe & Ker, Cappi W., 2014. "Deploying lean in healthcare: Evaluating information technology effectiveness in U.S. hospital pharmacies," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 556-560.
    15. Zucchelli, E & Jones, A.M & Rice, N, 2010. "The evaluation of health policies through microsimulation methods," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 10/03, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    16. Christiaan G. Abildso & Cynthia K. Perry & Lauren Jacobs & M. Renée Umstattd Meyer & Megan McClendon & Michael B. Edwards & James N. Roemmich & Zachary Ramsey & Margaret Stout, 2021. "What Sets Physically Active Rural Communities Apart from Less Active Ones? A Comparative Case Study of Three US Counties," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Miaomiao Tian & Da Feng & Xi Chen & Yingchun Chen & Xi Sun & Yuanxi Xiang & Fang Yuan & Zhanchun Feng, 2013. "China's Rural Public Health System Performance: A Cross-Sectional Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    evaluation; efficiency; healthcare services.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:econmn:v:13:y:2010:i:2:p:457-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.