IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v111y2025ics0149718925000655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fidelity to an early childhood home visitation program model’s prenatal physical activity curriculum modules: A convergent parallel mixed-methods investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Dyer, Angela M.
  • Daily, Shay M.
  • Davidov, Danielle M.
  • Giacobbi, Peter R.
  • Lilly, Christa
  • Sommerkorn, Ryan E.
  • Abildso, Christiaan G.

Abstract

Prenatal physical activity (PA) has been associated with health benefits with the potential to affect both mother and baby; however, a matter of conjecture remains regarding the fidelity with which different early childhood home visitation program models’ prenatal PA modules are delivered. Therefore, this mixed-methods study investigated the fidelity with which the Maternal Infant Health Outreach Worker program’s prenatal PA curriculum modules were delivered to clients. Data sources were: four focus groups ( n = 2, n = 3, n = 4, and n = 1) with community health workers, termed Outreach Workers (OWs); five interviews with Site Leaders; and existing client records for 109 clients (e.g., checklists of curriculum modules completed for clients). One key finding was that eight OWs discussed delivering the prenatal PA curriculum modules at multiple, most, or all of the home visits whereas the checklist data revealed that only 19.3 % of clients received two or more home visits where “prenatal PA” and/or “other” curriculum modules were delivered. Findings can be applied to enhance fidelity assessment and the fidelity with which the prenatal PA curriculum modules are delivered.

Suggested Citation

  • Dyer, Angela M. & Daily, Shay M. & Davidov, Danielle M. & Giacobbi, Peter R. & Lilly, Christa & Sommerkorn, Ryan E. & Abildso, Christiaan G., 2025. "Fidelity to an early childhood home visitation program model’s prenatal physical activity curriculum modules: A convergent parallel mixed-methods investigation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000655
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000655
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.