IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/compca/v14y2018i1p79-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Equality In The Romanian Educational System

Author

Listed:
  • Constantin Marius PROFIROIU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Corina Cristiana NASTACA

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

Inside the education system at all its levels, including higher education, a gender balance should be observed and discrimination concerning women access to positions with high power of decision in schools and universities should not exist. The present study focuses on the presence of three phenomena: vertical segregation, horizontal segregation and the ‘glass ceiling’ in higher education institutions from Romania. These phenomena are often manifested in the public sector so we could assume their presence in the education system, too. The methodology of research consists of an exploratory study conducted using 2003-2017 data. The study revealed that the Romanian educational system is a feminine field as from the total number of teachers from all levels, women represent over 70%. The horizontal segregation inside the education system is present from two perspectives. First of all, the highest percentage of female teachers is met in primary and secondary-lower education institutions, where women are over-represented (over 90% and 70% in 2017). In the academic area, we could observe that the number of female professors is lower as in the pre-university level, even if it registered an increase from 42% in 2003 to 51% in 2017. In the academic area, a certain gender equality has been reached as both genders are almost equally represented. Women are over-represented in relatively lower status positions whereas men are concentrated in better-paid, higher-status positions (in academia) that hold greater influence in policy and decision-making. Gender segregation could be observed inside the academic area too, where the number of women lowers as the academic rank is higher (women are represented better as Assistants and Lecturers). The study revealed that women in this professional category from higher education level did not manage to break the ‘glass-ceiling’, as in 2018, from 47 public universities from Romania only in four, women occupied the position of Rector. Concerning the position of Dean, women managed to hold around 30% of these positions. The results showed the presence of vertical discrimination among higher education system and a gender imbalance in leadership positions in academia. If in public administration of Romania, gender equality has been reached at the central level, we could not assume the same for the education system, which is a feminine sector where women are well-represented on inferior levels and where, with higher positions, lowers the feminine presence.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantin Marius PROFIROIU & Corina Cristiana NASTACA, 2018. "Gender Equality In The Romanian Educational System," Proceedings of Administration and Public Management International Conference, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 79-93, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:compca:v:14:y:2018:i:1:p:79-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://confcamp.ase.ro/2018/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/10-Profiroiu_Nastaca.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theo SPARREBOOM, 2014. "Gender equality, part-time work and segregation in Europe," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 153(2), pages 245-268, June.
    2. Barbara F. Reskin & Denise D. Bielby, 2005. "A Sociological Perspective on Gender and Career Outcomes," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(1), pages 71-86, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joanna Tyrowicz & Lucas van der Velde, 2017. "When the opportunity knocks: large structural shocks and gender wage gaps," GRAPE Working Papers 2, GRAPE Group for Research in Applied Economics.
    2. Jennifer Roberts & Karl Taylor, 2017. "Intra-household commuting choices and local labour markets," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 69(3), pages 734-757.
    3. Nghia Thi Thu Nguyen & Cheng-Tao Tang & Chun Yee Wong, 2021. "The Impacts of Social Enterprises on Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Patricia Palffy & Patrick Lehnert & Uschi Backes‐Gellner, 2023. "Social norms and gendered occupational choices of men and women: Time to turn the tide?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 380-410, October.
    5. Sabine Krueger & Christian Ebner & Daniela Rohrbach-Schmidt, 2024. "Gender Composition and the Symbolic Value of Occupations: New Evidence of a U-shaped Relationship between Gender and Occupational Prestige Based on German Microdata," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(1), pages 242-261, February.
    6. José-Ignacio Antón & Rafael Grande & Rafael Muñoz de Bustillo & Fernando Pinto, 2023. "Gender Gaps in Working Conditions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 53-83, February.
    7. Carolina Castagnetti & Luisa Rosti, 2012. "Unfair tournaments: gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates," DEM Working Papers Series 010, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    8. Leung, Ming D., 2017. "Taking a Pass: How Proportional Prejudice and Decisions Not to Hire Reproduce Sex Segregation," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt9f2420wj, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    9. Kreimer, Margareta & Mora, Ricardo, 2013. "Segregated integration : recent trends in the Austrian gender division of labor," UC3M Working papers. Economics we1317, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    10. Jasso, Guillermina & Kotz, Samuel, 2007. "Two Types of Inequality: Inequality Between Persons and Inequality Between Subgroups," IZA Discussion Papers 2749, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Fidan Ana Kurtulus & Donald Tomaskovic-Devey, 2012. "Do Female Top Managers Help Women to Advance? A Panel Study Using EEO-1 Records," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 639(1), pages 173-197, January.
    12. Marta Fana & Davide Villani & Martina Bisello, 2021. "Mind the task: evidence on persistent gender gaps at the workplace," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2021-03, Joint Research Centre.
    13. Coral del Río & Olga Alonso-Villar, 2018. "Social Welfare Losses Due to Occupational Segregation by Gender and Race/Ethnicity in the U.S.: Are There Differences across Regions?," Working Papers 1802, Universidade de Vigo, Departamento de Economía Aplicada.
    14. Eduardo Bericat & Eva Sánchez Bermejo, 2016. "Structural Gender Equality in Europe and Its Evolution Over the First Decade of the Twentyfirst Century," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 55-81, May.
    15. David Anderson & Margrét V. Bjarnadóttir & Cristian L. Dezső & David Gaddis Ross, 2019. "On a Firm’s Optimal Response to Pressure for Gender Pay Equity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 214-231, February.
    16. George Wilson, 2012. "Women’s Mobility into Upper-Tier Occupations," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 639(1), pages 131-148, January.
    17. Francine Blau & Peter Brummund & Albert Liu, 2013. "Trends in Occupational Segregation by Gender 1970–2009: Adjusting for the Impact of Changes in the Occupational Coding System," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(2), pages 471-492, April.
    18. Jennifer Merluzzi, 2017. "Gender and Negative Network Ties: Exploring Difficult Work Relationships Within and Across Gender," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 636-652, August.
    19. Inmaculada García-Mainar & Víctor M Montuenga & Guillermo García-Martín, 2018. "Occupational Prestige and Gender-Occupational Segregation," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 32(2), pages 348-367, April.
    20. Coral Río & Olga Alonso-Villar, 2018. "Segregation and Social Welfare: A Methodological Proposal with an Application to the U.S," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 257-280, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:compca:v:14:y:2018:i:1:p:79-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Popescu Irina Ruxandra (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.