Evaluation Of Cultural Heritage – From The Epistemological Precautions To Pragmatic Approaches
“Cultural heritage” defines something inherited from the past that has a certain cultural significance. The closeness between economists and heritage valuation experts is relatively recent and is due both to comprehending, by the last, that resources are limited and costly, and to economists contribution regarding evaluation means and methods that can be adapted to this field. The aim of this paper is to make a short journey into the conceptual framework of heritage notion, studying the different faces of “value” and the way in which it can be incorporated in public heritage decision-making process. The doctrinaire and methodological classifications are a necessary condition for the success of evaluation methods, including analysis of results. Thus, the objective of our study is to synthesize the theoretical and practical approaches of cultural heritage evaluation, considered crucial in management decisions with respect to this area.
Volume (Year): 5 (2011)
Issue (Month): 1 (November)
|Contact details of provider:|| |
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- repec:cup:cbooks:9780521528986 is not listed on IDEAS
- Mihaela Iacob & Georgiana Camelia Creţan, 2009. "Some Remarks On The „Evaluation Problem” In Cost-Benefit Analytics," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 12(12(541)(s), pages 154-160, December.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:cmanag:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:218-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dobrin Cosmin)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.