IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Evaluation Of Cultural Heritage – From The Epistemological Precautions To Pragmatic Approaches

  • Mihaela IACOB

    (Bucharest University of Economics, Faculty of Finance, Insurance, Banking and Stock Exchange)

  • Felicia ALEXANDRU

    (Bucharest University of Economics, Faculty of Finance, Insurance, Banking and Stock Exchange)

  • Meral KAGITCI

    (Bucharest University of Economics, Faculty of Finance, Insurance, Banking and Stock Exchange)

  • Georgiana Camelia CRETAN

    (Bucharest University of Economics, Faculty of Finance, Insurance, Banking and Stock Exchange)

  • Filip IORGULESCU

    (Bucharest University of Economics, Faculty of Finance, Insurance, Banking and Stock Exchange)

“Cultural heritage” defines something inherited from the past that has a certain cultural significance. The closeness between economists and heritage valuation experts is relatively recent and is due both to comprehending, by the last, that resources are limited and costly, and to economists contribution regarding evaluation means and methods that can be adapted to this field. The aim of this paper is to make a short journey into the conceptual framework of heritage notion, studying the different faces of “value” and the way in which it can be incorporated in public heritage decision-making process. The doctrinaire and methodological classifications are a necessary condition for the success of evaluation methods, including analysis of results. Thus, the objective of our study is to synthesize the theoretical and practical approaches of cultural heritage evaluation, considered crucial in management decisions with respect to this area.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://simpozion.management.ase.ro/articole/iacob.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania in its journal INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Modern Approaches in Organisational Management and Economy 2011.

Volume (Year): 5 (2011)
Issue (Month): 1 (November)
Pages: 218-223

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:rom:cmanag:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:218-223
Contact details of provider:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. repec:cup:cbooks:9780521528986 is not listed on IDEAS
  2. Mihaela Iacob & Georgiana Camelia Creţan, 2009. "Some Remarks On The „Evaluation Problem” In Cost-Benefit Analytics," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 12(12(541)(s), pages 154-160, December.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:cmanag:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:218-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dobrin Cosmin)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.