Evaluation of the results of scientific workers: the experience of New Zealand
Due to the growing importance of science for the economy and hard budget constraints in Russia the issue of increasing the efficiency of public funding of research activities is becoming increasingly urgent. The planned transition to a system of effective contracts in science requires regular assessment of the scientific staff's performance, resulting in the need for such an assessment methodology. As part of this article presents an analysis of the individual evaluation of researchers working in the OECD results on the example of New Zealand's experience of the countries and the ways to apply this experience in Russia in the development of methodology for assessing the performance of researchers.
Volume (Year): 1 (2016)
Issue (Month): (February)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 82, Vernadsky pr., 117571, Moscow|
Phone: +7 (499) 956 95 86
Fax: (095) 564-85-80
Web page: http://www.rane.ru/
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Гершман Михаил Анатольевич & Кузнецова Татьяна Евгеньевна, 2013. "Эффективный Контракт В Науке: Параметры Модели," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 7(3), pages 026-037.
- Pepi Mitica, 2013. "Evaluation of Knowledge-based Assets in the Modern EconomyAbstract:A great challenge of modern economy is the valuation of intangible assets and special knowledge asset. Emergence of the modern econom," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 667-672, May.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RANEPA maintainer)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.