IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep1602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the results of scientific workers: the experience of New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Fokina, Tatiana

    () (Lomonosov Moscow State University)

Abstract

Due to the growing importance of science for the economy and hard budget constraints in Russia the issue of increasing the efficiency of public funding of research activities is becoming increasingly urgent. The planned transition to a system of effective contracts in science requires regular assessment of the scientific staff's performance, resulting in the need for such an assessment methodology. As part of this article presents an analysis of the individual evaluation of researchers working in the OECD results on the example of New Zealand's experience of the countries and the ways to apply this experience in Russia in the development of methodology for assessing the performance of researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Fokina, Tatiana, 2016. "Evaluation of the results of scientific workers: the experience of New Zealand," Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 143-156, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://w82.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1602.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David L. Anderson & John Tressler, 2013. "The New Zealand performance-based research fund and its impact on publication activity in economics," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Гершман Михаил Анатольевич & Кузнецова Татьяна Евгеньевна, 2013. "Эффективный Контракт В Науке: Параметры Модели," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 7(3), pages 026-037.
    3. Damien Sauze & Hélène Sultan-Taïeb, 2010. "Interim Report for France”, Health at Work project European Commission - 7ème PCRDT « An Inquiry into the Health and Safety at Work: a European Union Perspective," Post-Print halshs-01232496, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    scientist; research activities; public financing of R & D; effective contract; an individual assessment of research quality;

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    • H59 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Other
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RANEPA maintainer). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.