The Ethics and Economics of Kickbacks and Fee Splitting
This paper examines the welfare effects of fee splitting or kickbacks paid by one physician to another in return for patient referrals. This practice is regarded as unethical and illegal in most cases, but it is shown that in a principal-agent context it is possible for fee splitting to offer incentives which actually improve patient welfare. Fee splitting occurs when there is a divergence between price and the referral partner's marginal opportunity cost. A restructuring of fee levels to yield physicians equal net income per unit time would remove the incentive for fee splitting. In the absence of this reform it is shown that fee splitting may induce the first-contact physician to refer instead of performing a lower quality procedure himself, and can also be a tool for eroding specialist monopoly power.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 10 (1979)
Issue (Month): 1 (Spring)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.rje.org|
|Order Information:||Web: https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/rje_online.cgi|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:10:y:1979:i:spring:p:344-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.